discussions
Subject: Re: [Troll] Terminology bindings ... again
The killer move would be to do something I advocated for years unsuccessfully:
separate SNOMED technology from content and allow them to be independently
licensable and used. Here, technology means representation (RF2 for
" but in some cases, *it is missing concepts*"
Shouldn't we contribute?
Is the same as openEHR, there are missing archetypes and we need the
community, users, clinical modelers and engineers to contribute.
LOINC also misses concepts, and when I asked them how can I contribute,
they sent me the
The killer move would be to do something I advocated for years
unsuccessfully: *separate SNOMED technology from content *and allow them
to be independently licensable and used. Here, technology means
representation (RF2 for example), open source programming libraries for
working with ref-sets
3 matches
Mail list logo
