Tim
This is definately a mistake - amny disorders have a date of onset that is
fuzzy from a month point of view but is worthwhile - last Pap smear, last
attendance at Ophthalmologist etc. The point about a fuzzy date is that it
is helpful for human interpretation - a month that a spouse died will
Henry
Thanks for the 'dumb' contribution. I hope that you can see that openEHR has
approached the problem in a way that will allow the sort of scenarion that
you have painted as well as a more complex scenario with a distributed
record - or even the big brother one record for each patient held
Hi,
After analysis done by the Smartcard people in the Netherlands they came to
the conclusion that Smartcards with significant medical information on it
need special safety procedures and back-up facilities.
These extra's necessitate a full back-up centrally and create
synchronisation
On 2002-06-12 03:34, Thomas Beale thomas at deepthought.com.au wrote:
Li, Henry wrote:
This is the process
A patient visits a care provider and presents his e-card as a proof of
consent to treatment
The health care provider loads up the health record into the browser and
download
Tony Grivell wrote:
One attractive option that goes some way to satisfy the above ideals
is to have any particular data exist in only one primary location
(backed up, of course), and therefore the total record scattered
potentially around the world. The patient-held e-card (also backed
5 matches
Mail list logo
