ISO 21090 data types too complex?

at openehr.org http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20101108

Why is OpenEHR adoption so slow?

/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20101108/8722e20e/attachment.html -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ocean_full_small.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 5828 bytes Desc: not available URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman

ISO 21090 data types too complex? - (longish)

Stef et al, In response to Stef's plea for others' opinions, I'd like to add my voice to Tom's concerns. I certainly believe that the whole ISO process with respect to health informatics standards is deeply flawed. As Grahame implies with the datatypes standard, the process is politically

ISO 21090 data types too complex?

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20101108/ee957113/attachment.html

ISO 21090 data types too complex? - (longish / CO challenge only)

: 32133713 -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20101108/3d0f3f12/attachment.html

ISO 21090 data types too complex? - (longish / CO challenge only)

William, I follow most of your posting, and I agree that much of the modelling of the concepts you describe can be done independently of an implementation context. [There is, of course, the question of tools that best help with this.] I think, in many instances, you are seeking agreement on

ISO 21090 data types too complex?

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20101108/ea79d47f/attachment.html

ISO 21090 data types too complex?

Andrew, I agree that there can be value in producing lower common denominator artefacts for short term implementation gains. I don't, however, see why we can't aim to gain agreement on more specifically defined artefacts as the basis for clinical models, and then, as you suggest, provide

ISO 21090 data types too complex?

I appreciate all of the remarks that have been make thus far. I am responding because I think we might have some shot at being better. I think many of you tak pot-shots at HL7, and that's OK. An elephant is easier to hit than an ant. In the early years, HL7 had only a few members who were very

ISO 21090 data types too complex?

: This is a digitally signed message part URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20101108/fe96cebf/attachment.asc

ISO 21090 data types too complex?

/attachments/20101108/614370e8/attachment.html

ISO 21090 data types too complex?

refuses to be an SDO. I didn't know that openEHR had refused... I didn't even know that it had been asked. - thomas -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20101108

ISO 21090 data types too complex?

-- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20101108/bc55f1f9/attachment.html

ISO 21090 data types too complex?

at results4care.nl telefoon +31 (0)654614458 fax +31 (0)33 2570169 Kamer van Koophandel nummer: 32133713 -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20101108/9da9514f

ISO 21090 data types too complex?

-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20101108/1f167442/attachment.html

ISO 21090 data types too complex?

Thanks. W. Ed Hammond, Ph.D. Director, Duke Center for Health Informatics Williamtfgoossen@ cs.com

ISO 21090 data types too complex?

with the people doing them; the formalism just doesn't support modelling them easily). - thomas -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20101108/1a65de94

ISO 21090 data types too complex?

. * - thomas -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20101108/600e36af/attachment.html

Why is OpenEHR adoption so slow?

/openehr-technical -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20101108/d81e60d6/attachment.html -- next part

Why is OpenEHR adoption so slow?

at www.abm.university-trust.wales.nhs.uk. -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20101108/d0589ce0/attachment.html

ISO 21090 data types too complex?

://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20101108/b6c481e3/attachment.html