Hi Tom
It is normal practice with CC to include clarifications and the whole
structure of the license is designed to do this.
Let's stay with the issue of how we stop someone copyrighting and charging
for a specialised archetype? Or a template that is fundamental to health
care (like an
Well that may be true but government agencies and companies will want to know
that no one has recourse to legal action if they use an archetype.
Cheers Sam
Sent from my phone
On 09/09/2011, at 8:21 AM, Timothy Cook timothywayne.cook at gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 16:54, Sam Heard
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20110909/fa73512b/attachment.html
On 09/09/2011 10:39, Seref Arikan wrote:
Hi Peter,
We may be able to replace Eiffel Vision with something else, but that
is the next step of experiments, and will take a long discussion
before we get started with it. Thanks for the explanation!
we can certainly do that - EiffelVision is only
bigger beasts...
- thomas
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20110909/73da1210/attachment.html
/20110909/1c02a302/attachment.html
There are already epSOS EN13606 archetypes
http://www.epsos.eu/uploads/tx_epsosfileshare/D3.5.2_Appendix_G_EN13606_Implementation.pdf
2011/9/9 Thomas Beale thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com:
On 09/09/2011 14:01, Stef Verlinden wrote:
Great initiative. Let's go for it. Even though I agree
Diego,
Are the archetypes online anywhere?
As an aside, it is an interesting document - 45 pages about archetypes,
including a lot of directly copied openEHR material, and no attribution
at all to openEHR! Lucky it is not an academic paper
- thomas
On 09/09/2011 15:28, Diego Bosc? wrote:
Hi Diego,
Yes. I saw David Moner's presentation on these at the MIE conference
in Oslo, and he and Gerard Freriks gave a very powerful account of the
power of archetype development in messaging production.
However, these archetypes also point to a somewhat different approach
(at least for now)
What part do you said is copied? ._.
Here the archetypes in ADL
http://en13606.webs.upv.es/web13606/index.php/activities/ceniso-13606-workshop-mie2011-oslo
2011/9/9 Thomas Beale thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com:
Diego,
Are the archetypes online anywhere?
As an aside, it is an interesting
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20110909/9c69212d/attachment.html
Thanks Diego,
My mistake - that wasn't clear at David's demonstration or from the
epSOS appendix.
Are the ENTRY level component archetypes available, and are they
designed to be for epSos use only or do they support a much broader
context of use e.g a full hospital or GP medication use?
It
de Valencia (UPV)
Camino de Vera, s/n, Edificio G-8, Acceso B, 3? planta
Valencia ? 46022 (Espa?a)
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20110909/fa75f391
On 09/09/2011 19:04, David Moner wrote:
Thomas,
Could you please clarify this sentence?
I'm the main author of that document. As you said, it is a 45 pages
document of which only two and a half are a summary description of ADL
to understand the proposed archetypes. And only there we can
Vera, s/n, Edificio G-8, Acceso B, 3? planta
Valencia ? 46022 (Espa?a)
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20110909/f8c1b5f3/attachment.html
://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20110909/13689bc0/attachment.html
16 matches
Mail list logo
