RE: SNOMEDCT - correct representation

Thanks Ian You are right. The correct ID is “SNOMED-CT” . Then the example will be as follows: Høyre øye SNOMED-CT 18944008

Re: SNOMEDCT - correct representation

But you probably need to define national extensions in constraint binding in templates. Templates are archetypes in the end 2017-04-25 11:47 GMT+02:00 Bert Verhees : > On 25-04-17 09:50, Diego Boscá wrote: > >> I think having this in a hardcoded terminology list is probably

Re: SNOMEDCT - correct representation

This should be used as the name at least then 2017-04-25 10:08 GMT+02:00 : > > There is a spec that tells you how to identify different editions and > versions of SNOMED CT - see http://snomed.org/uri > > In short, http://snomed.info/sct is the identifier for any version

Re: SNOMEDCT - correct representation

There is a spec that tells you how to identify different editions and versions of SNOMED CT - see http://snomed.org/uri In short, http://snomed.info/sct is the identifier for any version of SNOMED CT. for the Norway extension you need to know which module it is in (this is what will be used

Re: SNOMEDCT - correct representation

I think having this in a hardcoded terminology list is probably far from ideal (e.g. how do you put "snomed ct+norway national extension"? do we need an exhaustive listing of all possible extensions/versions?) 2017-04-25 8:03 GMT+02:00 Ian McNicoll : > SNOMED-CT is the

Re: SNOMEDCT - correct representation

SNOMED-CT is the official designator, based on the archetype editor terminology list. On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 at 06:36, Pablo Pazos wrote: > Congratulations about the new adoption! > > The IHTSDO recommends to use exactly "SNOMED CT" as the *name*, in our > specs we are