information with the medical
information. Should you be able to do it with AQL?
--
Alessandro Torrisi
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20150115/145996b2/attachment.html
this?
/items[at0008,1]/value/value = Mark
/items[at0009,2]/value/value = Rutte
regards
Bert Verhees
Alessandro Torrisi schreef op 19-11-2013 20:19:
i would say
/items[at0008,1]/value/value = Mark
/items[at0008,2]/value/value = Rutte
Alessandro
On 19 November 2013 13:57, Diego
://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
___
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
--
Alessandro Torrisi
if it will be better to give the DV_TEXT
datatype the possibility to put over there rich text. If we also add the
parameter formalism to it, there is no really need any more for a DV_
PARSABLE.
--
Alessandro Torrisi
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http
-technical_lists.openehr.org
--
Alessandro Torrisi
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120425/b37b83bb/attachment.html
?teborg, Sweden
email: olof.torgersson at chalmers.se
phone: +46 31 772 54 06
___
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical at openehr.org
http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
--
Alessandro Torrisi
upper1/upper
lower1/lower
/occurrences
node_idat0011/node_id
...
where lower occurences number is 1 and not 0! Maybe is the XML
serialization
wrong!?
leo
Alessandro Torrisi-3 wrote:
Leo,
perhaps you can look to this :
http://www.openehr.org/svn
/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
--
Alessandro Torrisi
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20100715/d9a3132c/attachment.html
and
disadvantages:
Advantage: The simpler it gets, the better it is. Removing the ?concept?
makes it more simpler.
Disadvantage: All parsers should be reviewed and probably need to be
updated.
Overall we think it is a good proposal to remove the ?concept? out of the
Archetype.
Alessandro Torrisi
9 matches
Mail list logo