Re: ACTION performer?

Can I suggest that a PR is raised for this ? - thomas On 27/08/2015 21:40, Ian McNicoll wrote: Hi Silje, I agree that ACTION.performer would be a useful addition (optional) to the RM. For now, I model

Re: ACTION performer?

On 27/08/2015 10:18, Bakke, Silje Ljosland wrote: So it’s possible to specify the role of each participant? yep - the PARTICIPATION type has 'function' i.e. 'role' (this name was adopted from 13606 a long time ago - probably too late to change). - thomas

Re: ACTION performer?

Hi Silje, I agree that ACTION.performer would be a useful addition (optional) to the RM. For now, I model performer as a participation. ACTION.other_participations inherits ENTRY.other_participations http://www.openehr.org/releases/trunk/UML/#Diagrams___18_1_83e026d_1433173757197_893618_10673

Re: ACTION performer?

Normally you would use participations. Sent from my HTC - Reply message - From: Bakke, Silje Ljosland silje.ljosland.ba...@nasjonalikt.no To: openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org Subject: ACTION performer? Date: Thu, Aug 27, 2015 10:00 Hi all

RE: ACTION performer?

So it’s possible to specify the role of each participant? Regards, Silje From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of thomas.be...@oceaninformatics.com Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 11:09 AM To: Openehr-Technical Subject: Re: ACTION performer

ACTION performer?

Hi all, According to Norwegian law, the performer or main performer of a procedure has to be explicitly recorded. The main performer is not necessarily the same person who records the action, so the COMPOSITION.composer RM object may not be used for this. We can't seem to find any complete