Sent: Tuesday, 23 June 2009 4:02 PM
To: For openEHR technical discussions
Subject: Re: Concept Overload Caution
Hi Heath,
I complety agree with you. Let's all do what we're best at. What I
would like to add to your proposal is some feedback (both ways) so
doctors and technicians can
Subject: Concept Overload Caution
Hi All,
The past 3 or 4 subjects on this list takes me back to conversations
that we had before (maybe several years ago?) when we were discussing
slots and links. Maybe they were here maybe they were on the ARB
list.
I do not recall now.
But my feeling
Hi Heath and Peter
Peter Gummer wrote:
Heath Frankel wrote:
I strongly believe that we need to have a
technical review process of archetypes before they are published. ...
Please understand that I not trying to re-empower the technician, I am
simply looking for good quality knowledge
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20090623/bf0d5aee/attachment.html
Hi Tim et al,
Interesting comments. Certainly it is very common for newcomers to openEHR
to model end-point datasets e.g. 'Diabetes consultation' as a single
archetype, rather than as a set of archetypes , aggregated into a template.
Sometimes this is due to a misunderstanding of the openEHR
Hi All,
The past 3 or 4 subjects on this list takes me back to conversations
that we had before (maybe several years ago?) when we were discussing
slots and links. Maybe they were here maybe they were on the ARB list.
I do not recall now.
But my feeling in both of these areas are that there
6 matches
Mail list logo
