Rong Chen wrote:
On 12/10/06, *Thomas Beale* Thomas.Beale at oceaninformatics.biz
mailto:Thomas.Beale at oceaninformatics.biz wrote:
Mattias Forss wrote:
It would be great if the archetypes could be updated soon. Could
I get
a listing of the changes so I can
On 12/10/06, Thomas Beale Thomas.Beale at oceaninformatics.biz wrote:
Mattias Forss wrote:
It would be great if the archetypes could be updated soon. Could I get
a listing of the changes so I can update the Java archetype editor
accordingly?
Thanks mattias,
I think we should upload a
Sam Heard wrote:
Yes, and replaced with Proportion which is a more general concept. Sam
Surely a proportion has to be constrained to lie between 0.0 and 1.0?
How can that be used to express quantities without units which are
greater than one (without the added complication of a multiplier). A
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20061211/b594f834/attachment.html
-- next part --
___
openEHR-technical mailing list
Hello,
The semantic debate, if I understood door well on the way to represent an
exploitable data by a computer. The topic is the numeration formulates red
chalk.
it exists an unit well to know the number of globules counted on the one hand by
reference to an unit of volume and a percentage in
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20061210/991d7f80/attachment.html
-- next part --
___
openEHR-technical mailing list
Sam Heard wrote:
Yes, and replaced with Proportion which is a more general concept. Sam
well, to be correct, we should wait for the ARB judgement on this.
- thomas
___
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical at openehr.org
Mattias Forss wrote:
It would be great if the archetypes could be updated soon. Could I get
a listing of the changes so I can update the Java archetype editor
accordingly?
Thanks mattias,
I think we should upload a set that have many/most of the improvements
your work has introduced, I
2006/12/8, Thomas Beale Thomas.Beale at oceaninformatics.biz:
Mattias Forss wrote:
Does this mean that the ratio constraint could as of now be removed from
the archetype editors? Will the DV_RATIO class be removed from the
specifications as well? If not, should the editors change the
Mattias Forss wrote:
Another issue not at all related to the above:
The Ocean editor writes other_contributors = in the description
part when there are no other contributors, but since the attribute is
not mandatory, garbage like this should be removed from the
archetypes. If the
2006/11/30, Sam Heard sam.heard at oceaninformatics.biz:
Dear All
We have been working on the data types as we have known that there is a
need to deal with fractions, ratios and percentages when the idea is of
proportion - ie there is no units. Since the DV_QUANTITY_RATIO points to
11 matches
Mail list logo
