Re: Strange behavior in Template designer 2.8.94 Beta

nical@lists.openehr.org" Subject: Re: Strange behavior in Template designer 2.8.94 Beta The new tool is AOM 2.x inside, but I have to admit I have not investigated how this particular problem is resolved in it. - thomas On 20/08/2018 11:42, Peter Gummer wrote: Hi Hildi, On 20 Aug 2018, at 19:13,

Re: Strange behavior in Template designer 2.8.94 Beta

nical@lists.openehr.org" Subject: Re: Strange behavior in Template designer 2.8.94 Beta The new tool is AOM 2.x inside, but I have to admit I have not investigated how this particular problem is resolved in it. - thomas On 20/08/2018 11:42, Peter Gummer wrote: Hi Hildi, On 20 Aug 2018

Re: Strange behavior in Template designer 2.8.94 Beta

Okay, interesting! It would have made things easier for us 5 or 10 years ago to have had a looser interpretation of the ‘unique path rule’. Perhaps it was a case of erring on the side of caution, since it's always easier to relax a rule that turns out to have been too strict rather than

Re: Strange behavior in Template designer 2.8.94 Beta

The new tool is AOM 2.x inside, but I have to admit I have not investigated how this particular problem is resolved in it. - thomas On 20/08/2018 11:42, Peter Gummer wrote: Hi Hildi, On 20 Aug 2018, at 19:13, Hildegard McNicoll > wrote: Incidentally, the new web

Re: Strange behavior in Template designer 2.8.94 Beta

Hi Peter It's probably best to defer the exact answer to others, but my understanding is that the 'unique path rule' was interpreted too tightly in Template Designer, rather than this being a strict limitation in ADL 1.4. Certainly there is no need to migrate to ADL 2.0 with ADL Designer, it

Re: Strange behavior in Template designer 2.8.94 Beta

Hi Hildi, > On 20 Aug 2018, at 19:13, Hildegard McNicoll wrote: > > Incidentally, the new web based ADL Designer tool developed by Marand doesn't > have this problem anymore. As far as I know it is very close to being > released now. I’m curious — from a purely academic perspective, now,

Re: Strange behavior in Template designer 2.8.94 Beta

Hi Dileep In your particular example I would leave the archetype unchanged, but instead rename the Issue name to say 'complaint description'. That way you can keep the multiple recurrence of the archetype, but have your preferred name in the data as the left hand side of the name/value pair. You

Re: Strange behavior in Template designer 2.8.94 Beta

Hi Dileep, Right-click the node and select the Clone option. Then rename the duplicate of the node. Regards, Peter > On 20 Aug 2018, at 15:03, Dileep V S wrote: > > Dear Peter, > > Thanks for your reply. However I am not sure I fully understand the logic of > this. > > OpenEHR has a

Re: Strange behavior in Template designer 2.8.94 Beta

Dear Peter, Thanks for your reply. However I am not sure I fully understand the logic of this. OpenEHR has a way to represent multi occurrence nodes (by appending 0, 1 etc to the path) such that the paths will remain unique. This should work even when the mode is constrained with a name as well.

Re: Strange behavior in Template designer 2.8.94 Beta

Hi Dileep, Yes, this is expected. The behaviour was first noticed about 10 years ago, and initially it was reported as a bug. After some thought we realised that it’s the correct behaviour. I found it incredibly annoying too! My memory of the exact reasoning is poor, after all of these years;