Bert Verhees wrote:
Williamtfgoossen at cs.com schreef:
In een bericht met de datum 18-12-2006 18:00:54 West-Europa
(standaardtijd), schrijft mattias.forss at gmail.com:
Maybe you're right, the definitions could be added as comments, but
for proprietary terminology like SNOMED CT this
Just to say thank you to Tim C and others for the clear and helpful recent
posts concerning SNOMED-CT and openEHR. I am in frequent contact with Prof
Martin Severs, Chairman of the NHS Clinical Data Standards Board, here in
England. Martin is very busy with the international negotiations towards
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20061219/b572aa58/attachment.html
-- next part --
___
openEHR-technical mailing list
In een bericht met de datum 18-12-2006 18:00:54 West-Europa (standaardtijd),
schrijft mattias.forss at gmail.com:
Maybe you're right, the definitions could be added as comments, but for
proprietary terminology like SNOMED CT this will mean that these kind of
archetypes can only be
In een bericht met de datum 18-12-2006 20:44:14 West-Europa (standaardtijd),
schrijft Thomas.Beale at OceanInformatics.biz:
This is not an unreasonable request - it would not be particularly
difficult to implement in the specs or the tools, if we know what to
implement. We have to be
In een bericht met de datum 18-12-2006 17:28:53 West-Europa (standaardtijd),
schrijft ian at gpacc.co.uk:
Hi Mattias,
I do appreciate these difficulties but if the definition of the binding
changes the binding itself may be obsolete. I agree the comment idea is less
than
2006/12/19, Williamtfgoossen at cs.com Williamtfgoossen at cs.com:
In een bericht met de datum 18-12-2006 18:00:54 West-Europa
(standaardtijd), schrijft mattias.forss at gmail.com:
Maybe you're right, the definitions could be added as comments, but for
proprietary terminology like SNOMED CT
In een bericht met de datum 19-12-2006 10:52:14 West-Europa (standaardtijd),
schrijft bert.verhees at rosa.nl:
You mean, for free? Paid by the resp. governments?
That, I did not know.
Bert
Yes, that is what I mean, and Denmark and the Netherlands have agreed to
participate. So anyone
In een bericht met de datum 19-12-2006 11:28:56 West-Europa (standaardtijd),
schrijft mattias.forss at gmail.com:
We'll see about that. Read about the issues with SNOMED and LOINC here
A
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20061219/acac5d38/attachment.html
-- next part --
___
openEHR-technical mailing list
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20061218/707c2271/attachment.html
-- next part --
___
openEHR-technical mailing list
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20061218/548fab4a/attachment.html
-- next part --
___
openEHR-technical mailing list
documentation.
Ian
From: Sam Heard [mailto:sam.he...@oceaninformatics.biz]
Sent: 18 December 2006 00:22
To: For openEHR technical discussions
Subject: Re: Suggestions re Term binding in Archetype Editor
Version 1 candidate does this and will be out soon Ian - it does not include
the SNOMED text
From: Sam Heard [mailto:sam.heard at oceaninformatics.biz]
Sent: 18 December 2006 00:22
To: For openEHR technical discussions
Subject: Re: Suggestions re Term binding in Archetype Editor
Version 1 candidate does this and will be out soon Ian - it does not
include
the SNOMED text
discussions
Subject: Re: Suggestions re Term binding in Archetype Editor
Hi Ian,
Archetypes are designed to be loosely coupled with terminology so that they
can be used when there are no terminology resources available.
If we have comments of the bindings, we get another problem because
2006/12/18, Ian McNicoll ian at gpacc.co.uk:
Hi Mattias,
I do appreciate these difficulties but if the definition of the binding
changes the binding itself may be obsolete.
If the binding changes so much in the terminology that it may be obsolete in
the archetype it would probably lead to
Hi,
I am currently working my way slowly through the Scottish Cardiac dataset,
converting it to archetypes as proof-of-concept, using the OE editor.
Term binding (to SNOMED) will be a crucial aspect from our perspective,
especially binding local (interface) terms to SNOMED concepts.
This
In een bericht met de datum 15-12-2006 14:40:59 West-Europa (standaardtijd),
schrijft ian at mcmi.co.uk:
Hi,
I am currently working my way slowly through the Scottish Cardiac dataset,
converting it to archetypes as proof-of-concept, using the OE editor.
Term binding (to SNOMED) will be
::121457]
From: Williamtfgoossen at cs.com [mailto:williamtfgoos...@cs.com]
Sent: 15 December 2006 14:30
To: openehr-technical at openehr.org
Subject: Antw: Suggestions re Term binding in Archetype Editor
In een bericht met
19 matches
Mail list logo
