David,
the AOM certainly doesn't care, you are right about that. Since we treat
that as the normative form, we should logically say it is the same as
UML, i.e. a guideline for readability. I think the ADL parsers do use
this convention at the moment to match class and attribute names more
While working with archetypes for different reference models we have faced a
problem regarding the uppercase/lowercase rules for naming archetype nodes
at ADL.
The ADL specifications imposes the following rule: A type name is any
identifier with an initial upper case letter, followed by any
2 matches
Mail list logo
