Hi Greg,
Rong has indicated there is a paper about archetype query language. Thanks
Rong. That paper introduced basic query syntax. It was written at the
beginning of this year. The query syntax has been enriched recently in order
to support more complicated queries. I've already started to write
Hi Greg,
The Archetype Query Language (AQL, formerly known as EHR Query language or
EQL) was developed by Ocean Informatics and a specification is being
prepared to be offered to the openEHR foundation as a candidate openEHR
specification. For now the paper referred to by Rong is the main
I appreciate the information. Writing new queries wouldn't be too
hard, it is parsing the queries and then executing the corresponding
queries or service calls against the implemented system that is the
tricky part.
Is Ocean Informatics planning to provide a open source java (or
similar
Greg Caulton wrote:
Thanks Rong,
Just the thought for someone but it would be handy to have the XPath
(such as o/data[at0001]/events[at0006]/data[at0003]/items[at0004]/value/value)
for a data value somewhere accessible in the editor or in the html
generated content such as
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 06:18 -0500, Greg Caulton wrote:
Of course that would break if a new data element was added in a
position (fabricated)
data[at0001]/events[at0099]/data[at00100]/items[at0004]/value but the
simplicity is tempting.
This is of course why you should (IMHO) change your focus
One reason for the question was that it wasn't clear whether the
at uniquely identifies a concept within the ADL. I think it still
does, but it can have different context depending on where it occurs.
Implementing a hierarchy of information (information model) using
entity relationships
-technical at openehr.org
http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20071105/5145b2c3/attachment.html
-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20071105/3f4ea615/attachment.html
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 19:25 +0100, Gerard Freriks wrote:
Why?
(Not that I intend to do that)
On Nov 5, 2007, at 1:20 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
(please do NOT use MySQL for healthcare
information)
I will assume that your WHY? question was in response to this
statement I made?
In
Tim Cook schreef:
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 19:25 +0100, Gerard Freriks wrote:
Why?
(Not that I intend to do that)
On Nov 5, 2007, at 1:20 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
(please do NOT use MySQL for healthcare
information)
I will assume that your WHY? question was in
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20071105/18b7507e/attachment.html
mailing listopenEHR-technical at
openehr.orghttp://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
__ NOD32 2639 (20071105) Information __
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.http://www.eset.com
12 matches
Mail list logo
