Improving Translation_details and other_contributors ?

://windowslive.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=802246 -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20090624/950b95a7/attachment.html

Concept Overload Caution

Hi everyone There are a lot of technical people who have volunteered as reviewers on CKM and we have had major input from a number of them. There will be more issues that arise when we have the first set of archetypes for publication to ensure consistency. There is no doubt that we all benefit

distributed development, governance and artefact identification for openEHR

Hi Tom, This is a good document - thanks. I have posted this to the clinical list as well. http://www.openehr.org/svn/specification/TRUNK/publishing/architecture/am/di st_dev_model.pdf My comments: Page 11: Current text: Archetypes based on different classes from the same information model to

distributed development, governance and artefact identification for openEHR

Hi Tom Another very thoughtful document. I have been involved to some degree in the discussion of this area over the years as have many others prior to this draft release. http://www.openehr.org/svn/specification/TRUNK/publishing/architecture/am/di st_dev_model.pdf This document suggests

distributed development, governance and artefact identification for openEHR

Sam Heard wrote: 1. Primacy of openEHR: I would propose that we need a hierarchy of authority. Although openEHR artefacts are presently managed within the Foundation it is possible that the governance will move to a more authoritative organisation in the near future. That said, I believe that

Improving Translation_details and other_contributors ?

-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20090624/bc636f41/attachment.html

Out of office

I will be out of the office until July 13, 2009 with limited access to voice-mail and e-mail. If you have an urgent IT issue, please contact Darin Ivie at 208-819-4626.