Basic EHR functionality

Ignacio Valdes wrote: > At the VA, a note is still deletable until it is electronically > signed. You can save it and not sign it and still be able to delete > it. I do not know the algorithm of signature but it involves a > pin-like password that is different from your login. I bet the VistA

Data Security was: Basic EHR functionality

Gavin Brelstaff wrote: > Thomas Beale wrote: > >>> >> A well known study in Harvard medical school (I think) showed that >> putting the message "Do not inappropriately access patient data - all >> your accesses are being logged" on clinician screens a few times a >> day resulted in a drop to ne

Data Security was: Basic EHR functionality

asc > > Key fingerprint = 8C22 BF76 33BA B3B5 1D5B EB37 7891 46A9 EAF9 93D0 > > > > > > -- Tim C PGP/GnuPG Key 1024D/EAF993D0 available from keyservers everywhere or at http://members.optushome.com.au/tchur/pubkey.asc Key fingerprint = 8C22 BF76 33BA B3B5 1D5B EB37 7891 46A9 EAF9 93D0 -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20040310/d83ca847/attachment.asc>

Data Security was: Basic EHR functionality

d.lloyd at openehr.org -- Tim C PGP/GnuPG Key 1024D/EAF993D0 available from keyservers everywhere or at http://members.optushome.com.au/tchur/pubkey.asc Key fingerprint = 8C22 BF76 33BA B3B5 1D5B EB37 7891 46A9 EAF9 93D0 -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20040310/89eea19d/attachment.asc>

Propositions?

Matias Klein wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > Before replying I wanted to give this issue some serious thought. > Ultimately I believe this problem comes down to rendering. Since I > feel that proper rendering of archetypes is central to lossless > interchange, IMHO this is going to have a major i

Propositions?

gfrer wrote: XFORMS perhaps? > http://www.w3.org/TR/xforms/ > > Gerard What about Relaxatron? http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2004/02/11/relaxtron.html Unlike W3C schema it makes it simplifies the process of defining constraints on structured documents. The RelaxNG bit does the rules about documen

Data Security was: Basic EHR functionality

Hi Tim, One I failed to include is: RFC 3586 - IP Security Policy (IPSP) Requirements http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3586.html Some of the included links support searches, e.g., The CMU link returned over 2200 hits on a search for 'security policy'. Lots of policy-related information that is appr

Propositions?

hnical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20040310/f7e82abb/attachment.bin>

Data Security was: Basic EHR functionality

Hi Tim, Security policies are included as are implementation approaches. Regards! -Thomas Clark Tim Churches wrote: >On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 19:10, Thomas Clark wrote: > > >>Hi Tim, >> >>Might want to add: >> >>Computer Security Basics >>http://www.oreilly.de/catalog/csb/toc.html >> >>IEEE; Co

Data Security was: Basic EHR functionality

scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20040310/5e3db997/attachment.asc>

Data Security was: Basic EHR functionality

Hi Tim, Might want to add: Computer Security Basics http://www.oreilly.de/catalog/csb/toc.html IEEE; Compartmented Mode Workstation: Prototype Highlights http://csdl.computer.org/comp/trans/ts/1990/06/e0608abs.htm CMU; Trusted Operating Systems http://www.sei.cmu.edu/str/descriptions/trusted_bo