Differential display
the there is a gowing need to have a possibility to easily use archetypes together with HL7 CDA. As Stefan also pointed out, many national ehealth programs have opted to use this part of HL7v3! This is a chance for openEHR as it is way ahead of the HL7 template initiative with respect to clinician involvement, which is crucial. So maybe, we could discuss whether to create an CDA-compatibility SECTION archetype with a Level1 and a Level3 section. Cheers, Thilo ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical at openehr.org http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical -- *Thomas Beale Chief Technology Officer, Ocean Informatics http://www.oceaninformatics.com/* Chair Architectural Review Board, /open/EHR Foundation http://www.openehr.org/ Honorary Research Fellow, University College London http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/ * * ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical at openehr.org http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical at openehr.org http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical at openehr.org http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20080821/139065f6/attachment.html
Is there a UML class diagram for templates?
Adam Flinton wrote: Preferably in Eclipse UML2...? If so does it then include the archetypes class model as well? *The UML for the forthcoming openEHR template model is online in the latest AOM draft (some changes to AOM of ADL 1.4 vintage) and Templates draft, available at the page http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/spec/openEHR+Templates+and+Specialised+Archetypes However, if you are after UML for the current .oet file format, I don't think it is published, but I would imagine it already exists - publishing it should be no problem. Can you indicate which one you are after? - thomas beale *
Differential display
Andrew Patterson wrote: I agree that the narrative form wins but I think the HL7 people would be horrified by the thought that CDA structured content was generating textual content which could then be secondarily changed - it is a clearly broken use case and noone would design new software that way - but I understand that there are some legacy systems in Australia that do it this way and that Ocean needs to come up with solutions around this. But I am quite keen that solutions to this particular outlying use case don't impact on solutions to (b) and (c) unless we all understand the ramifications. well, Ocean is just one vendor that has products that have to interface with Medical Director, which is the most widely entrenched GP desktop package in Australia. I think the main thing is how the semantics of data in a package like MD translates to archetyped structures, which are independent of the vendor product trying to extract data from the GP dekstop. - thomas beale
