Hi Tom,
On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 12:28 +, Thomas Beale wrote:
The current design of ADL 1.5 is that template ids will be declared in
the data (since they are just like archetype ids) - see
http://www.openehr.org/svn/specification/TRUNK/publishing/architecture/am/knowledge_id_system.pdf
So it is really about the mechanisms for sharing archetypes and
templates. If specific templates are made available for sharing, then
they will be used, just like archetypes. If locally produced
specialised archetypes are made available for sharing, the same for
them; otherwise the receiver system has to revert back to whatever
archetypes and templates it can access.
...
Archetypes contain slots; templates fill them and remove unwanted
archetype data points (generally most of them in any given template).
It is a matter for discussion whether templates should ever be allowed
to add new data points the way an archetype can.
Thanks for these clarifications. They are *very* important points to
consider.
IMHO, if templates are permitted to add to the constraints published by
an archetype then it changes the basic design paradigm.
Something to consider very seriously.
Regards,
Tim
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20101205/b3aefd7c/attachment.asc
