Hi Tom, On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 12:28 +0000, Thomas Beale wrote: > The current design of ADL 1.5 is that template ids will be declared in > the data (since they are just like archetype ids) - see > http://www.openehr.org/svn/specification/TRUNK/publishing/architecture/am/knowledge_id_system.pdf > > So it is really about the mechanisms for sharing archetypes and > templates. If specific templates are made available for sharing, then > they will be used, just like archetypes. If locally produced > specialised archetypes are made available for sharing, the same for > them; otherwise the receiver system has to revert back to whatever > archetypes and templates it can access.
... > Archetypes contain slots; templates fill them and remove unwanted > archetype data points (generally most of them in any given template). > It is a matter for discussion whether templates should ever be allowed > to add new data points the way an archetype can. Thanks for these clarifications. They are *very* important points to consider. IMHO, if templates are permitted to add to the constraints published by an archetype then it changes the basic design paradigm. Something to consider very seriously. Regards, Tim -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20101205/b3aefd7c/attachment.asc>
