://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120112/4674a530/attachment.html
Heath Frankel wrote:
I believe this unique name rule should be reviewed and revoked. It is not
formally defined, as indicated in [
http://www.openehr.org/issues/browse/SPECPR-54 ] its only stated in the
architecture overview in the context of paths which assumes name is the
unique within
--
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120112/737770cb/attachment.html
was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120112/dad61f89/attachment.html
Hi Miroslav,
This is a very interesting and attractive suggestion. I have looked at
the ISHEP 2011 content and there is certainly a degree of overlap of
interest, particular from national agencies, on which we can build.
Sharing resources and sponsor input would certainly make much more
sense
5 matches
Mail list logo