Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - getting close

2015-06-11 Thread Seref Arikan
You're probably right. It is hard to find the acceptable level of strategic voting :) On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:54 PM, David Moner wrote: > I would not do so. This is not an automatic process, this first phase is > just a way of filtering proposals. For sure the people in StackExchange > will ev

Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - getting close

2015-06-11 Thread David Moner
I would not do so. This is not an automatic process, this first phase is just a way of filtering proposals. For sure the people in StackExchange will evaluate each proposal in detail, and if they find that votes and questions are clearly addressed or governed the proposal won't be accepted. 2015-0

Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - getting close

2015-06-11 Thread Seref Arikan
Thanks, can someone write a comment (shamelessly in capitals..) under the highest voted (16 the moment) question asking visitors to NOT to vote for questions with > 10 votes? My user can't do it for some reason. There are ~19 wasted points that could have been used on other questions a.t.m and pe

RE: openEHR @ StackExchange - getting close

2015-06-11 Thread Cavero Barca, Carlos
Done! 90 followers :) Regards. Carlos. -Original Message- From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Arild Faxvaag Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 3:46 PM To: For openEHR technical discussions Subject: Re: openEHR @ Sta

Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - getting close

2015-06-11 Thread Arild Faxvaag
done signing up and upvoting. ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org

Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - getting close

2015-06-11 Thread Jan-Marc Verlinden
How would we get more than the five provided votes per person? Would love to vote more..:-). == Regards, Jan-Marc Mobile 06 53785650 *MEDvision360 BV* www.MedVision360.com www.MedRecord.nl House of Vision Rouwkooplaan 5 te Voorschoten 2015-06-11 15:04 GMT+02:00 Ian McNicoll : > Thanks Shinj

Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - getting close

2015-06-11 Thread Ian McNicoll
Thanks Shinji, We are now up to 85 followers and only need 14 more of the current questions to be upvoted by 10 or more people and we are there. If you still have votes please use them and be tactical :) Ian Dr Ian McNicoll mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 office +44 (0)1536 414994 skype: ianmcnicoll

Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - getting close

2015-06-11 Thread Shinji KOBAYASHI
I sent support request to openehr-jp mailing list. Shinji 2015-06-11 7:56 GMT+09:00 Thomas Beale : > > We are getting closer to the next step. We have 76 followers. > > We still need 17 questions with 10 votes. We have the requisite number of > questions, it's just a case of people using their vo

Re: openEHR @ StackExchange - getting close

2015-06-11 Thread Seref Arikan
Just tweeted for help. Feel free to do the same or RT On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Thomas Beale < thomas.be...@oceaninformatics.com> wrote: > > We are getting closer > to the next > step. We have 76 followers. > > We still need 17 ques

Re: VERSION.lifecycle_state options

2015-06-11 Thread Sebastian Iancu
Hi, I can rephrase my question: "How can I indicate that a version should not be changed under any circumstances? How have other openEHR implementations handling this issue (if ever occurred)?" The use case I have is in mental-care in NL is that care providers are setting up a care plan (whi