Re: name of language to define OPTs ?
As I understand it is XML Regards On Sat 12 Oct, 2019, 9:44 PM Georg Fette, wrote: > Hello, > What is the language name in which templates (OPT and OPT2) are defined ? > Greetings > Georg > > -- > - > Dipl.-Inf. Georg Fette Raum: B001 > Universität WürzburgTel.: +49-(0)931-31-85516 > Am Hubland Fax.: +49-(0)931-31-86732 > 97074 Würzburg mail: georg.fe...@uni-wuerzburg.de > - > > > ___ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org > > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org > ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
Re: difference in expressability for archetype and template definitions
In ADL2 yes El sáb., 12 oct. 2019 17:17, Georg Fette escribió: > so, ADL2 is used to define both archetypes as well as templates ? > > -- > - > Dipl.-Inf. Georg Fette Raum: B001 > Universität WürzburgTel.: +49-(0)931-31-85516 > Am Hubland Fax.: +49-(0)931-31-86732 > 97074 Würzburg mail: georg.fe...@uni-wuerzburg.de > - > > > ___ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org > > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org > ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
Re: difference in expressability for archetype and template definitions
so, ADL2 is used to define both archetypes as well as templates ? -- - Dipl.-Inf. Georg Fette Raum: B001 Universität WürzburgTel.: +49-(0)931-31-85516 Am Hubland Fax.: +49-(0)931-31-86732 97074 Würzburg mail: georg.fe...@uni-wuerzburg.de - ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
Re: difference in expressability for archetype and template definitions
Originally they were thought as two different artifacts to live in different parts of the system. But as you point this is not the case. That's why in ADL2 both archetypes and templates are describe by the sane artifacts In case of ADL1.4, templates que usually describe in OPT, which has different expressability El sáb., 12 oct. 2019 17:03, Georg Fette escribió: > Hello, > In what extends does the specification language for defining archetypes > and the language for defining templates differ ? > Both take existing data models (RM types and archetypes) and constrain > them as needed. > It is often said, that archetypes are used to recombine RM types and > templates are used to recombine archetypes. But the slot mechanism > within the archetype definition does as well allow archetypes > recombination within archetypes. And the constraining that is done > within templates could as well be done using the constraining mechanisms > of archetype design. > Why are two specification languages needed ? And if one has elements > that the other is missing, why can't those elements simply be included > in the other, to reduce the amount of specification languages ? > Greetings > Georg > > -- > - > Dipl.-Inf. Georg Fette Raum: B001 > Universität WürzburgTel.: +49-(0)931-31-85516 > Am Hubland Fax.: +49-(0)931-31-86732 > 97074 Würzburg mail: georg.fe...@uni-wuerzburg.de > - > > > ___ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org > > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org > ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
name of language to define OPTs ?
Hello, What is the language name in which templates (OPT and OPT2) are defined ? Greetings Georg -- - Dipl.-Inf. Georg Fette Raum: B001 Universität WürzburgTel.: +49-(0)931-31-85516 Am Hubland Fax.: +49-(0)931-31-86732 97074 Würzburg mail: georg.fe...@uni-wuerzburg.de - ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
difference in expressability for archetype and template definitions
Hello, In what extends does the specification language for defining archetypes and the language for defining templates differ ? Both take existing data models (RM types and archetypes) and constrain them as needed. It is often said, that archetypes are used to recombine RM types and templates are used to recombine archetypes. But the slot mechanism within the archetype definition does as well allow archetypes recombination within archetypes. And the constraining that is done within templates could as well be done using the constraining mechanisms of archetype design. Why are two specification languages needed ? And if one has elements that the other is missing, why can't those elements simply be included in the other, to reduce the amount of specification languages ? Greetings Georg -- - Dipl.-Inf. Georg Fette Raum: B001 Universität WürzburgTel.: +49-(0)931-31-85516 Am Hubland Fax.: +49-(0)931-31-86732 97074 Würzburg mail: georg.fe...@uni-wuerzburg.de - ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org