GPIC

2005-07-26 Thread Bert Verhees
s, but also work from early adapters like me. >> >> I understand that it is better to change half way than to proceed in >> error. But if such an important change takes place, one will want to >> know how it is possible that such an erroneous large part (400 pages, >> 2

GPIC

2005-07-23 Thread Thomas Beale
Bert Verhees wrote: > > > So no problem at all, in the end, one could say. > > The holy grail is a more generic approach which allows archetypes > written as simple scripts which can use an information-system flexible > and even allows ad-hoc creations of archetypes. > Creating a ne

GPIC

2005-07-22 Thread Bert Verhees
Thomas Beale wrote: > > Bert Verhees wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Thomas Beale asked me to write more to this mailinglist, and I have >> an important issue to discuss. >> >> Last thursday, I had a meeting wherein Thomas was present, in fact, >> it was education about EN13606. After a whole day of talki

GPIC

2005-07-21 Thread Thomas Beale
lically. Something serious must be wrong somewhere. > > It may be interesting to get a better idea of who are the users of GPICs - I don't know the answer to that, but I think it might be a relevant question for you and other implementors of them. >What also seems very strange t

GPIC

2005-07-17 Thread Bert Verhees (ROSA Software)
me, I discussed a GPIC SubjectOfInvestigation with Edward Glueck and Tom Marley on 25 may 2005, I discussed GPICs with Gerard Freriks on 4 jun 2005. No mention about the fact that GPICs are obsoleet, or will be obsoleet in a few weeks from then. Then on 14 july 2005 I hear that GPICs do not p