OCL (was: RE: Introducing myself + question)

Thanks for the response Pete, Pete Rivett wrote: >You should use "not(wife.oclIsUndefined())" as opposed to >"wife->notEmpty()". This avoids the problems you outline about treating >the value as a Set. > I still don't see how this would work: now there is an assumed method called oclIsUndefined

OCL (was: RE: Introducing myself + question)

> >Instead one is forced to write: > >context Person inv: > >wife->notEmpty() implies wife.gender = Gender::female > >which is not only counter-intuitive (Person.wife is not defined as a Set >of anything, it is defined as a Person), but seems wrong because there is >no formal connection between

OCL (was: RE: Introducing myself + question)

BH1 1HL, UK >Tel: +44 (0)1202 449419 Fax: +44 (0)1202 449448 >http://www.adaptive.com > > > > > > >>-Original Message- >>From: Thomas Beale [mailto:thomas at deepthought.com.au] >>Sent: 24 March 2003 20:42 >>To: Tom Culpepper >>Cc: dhlong

Introducing myself + question

; From: owner-openehr-technical at openehr.org > [mailto:owner-openehr-technical at openehr.org]On Behalf Of Thomas Beale > Sent: Sunday, 23 March 2003 11:24 PM > To: Rafal Szczesniak > Cc: openehr-technical at openehr.org > Subject: Re: Introducing myself + question > > >

OCL (was: RE: Introducing myself + question)

Hi Pete, Pete Rivett wrote: >Hi Thomas, >I appreciate the trouble you've taken to evaluate OCL, and think several >of the issues are worthy of consideration. >Just for your information, and for others on this list, the latest >version of the OCL 2.0 submission is 1.6 (as opposed to 1.0 you revie

Introducing myself + question

Tom Culpepper wrote: > I again would like to reiterate may opinion on this list concerning > the modeling of Healthcare. > > The business of Healthcare (both Clinical and Administrative) needs to > be modeled in a language, platform and operating system independent > manner. This will provide

Introducing myself + question

Hi Dave, David Forslund wrote: > IMHO, archetypes need to be specifiable independent of the platform > and language, including the querying. yes, we do too. We are working on a new (text) formalism for archetypes which we think will enable archetypes for openEHR, CEN and CDA to be interchang

Introducing myself + question

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Introducing myself + question

dhlong at vietkey.net wrote: >I thing C/C++ is the good choice, it's more popular, easy to embed in other >language, multi-platform. > Actually, people and projects implementing openEHR will make their own choices. There is no need to choose one thing. As the open source software pool grows, I

Introducing myself + question

At 11:42 AM 3/25/03 +1000, Thomas Beale wrote: >Tom Culpepper wrote: > >>I again would like to reiterate may opinion on this list concerning the >>modeling of Healthcare. >> >>The business of Healthcare (both Clinical and Administrative) needs to be >>modeled in a language, platform and operati

Introducing myself + question

I thing C/C++ is the good choice, it's more popular, easy to embed in other language, multi-platform. - Original Message - From: "Thomas Beale" To: "Rafal Szczesniak" Cc: Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 8:16 PM Subject: Re: Introducing myself + question >

Introducing myself + question

Rafal Szczesniak wrote: >On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 11:53:31PM +1000, Thomas Beale wrote: > > >>if you are thinking of specific querying language - I would agree - we >>can already see that the use of archetypes at runtime changes how >>queries are written and does require some new kind of lang

Introducing myself + question

t wrote: >I thing C/C++ is the good choice, it's more popular, easy to embed in other >language, multi-platform. > >- Original Message - >From: "Thomas Beale" >To: "Rafal Szczesniak" >Cc: >Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 8:16 PM >Subject: Re:

Introducing myself + question

Hello, > if you are thinking of specific querying language - I would agree - we > can already see that the use of archetypes at runtime changes how > queries are written and does require some new kind of language. We have > been experimenting on this, and are working on it... in our Framework, we

Introducing myself + question

Original Message - >From: "Thomas Beale" >To: "Rafal Szczesniak" >Cc: >Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 8:16 PM >Subject: Re: Introducing myself + question > > > > > > > > Rafal Szczesniak wrote: > > > > >On Sun, Mar 23, 2003

Introducing myself + question

if you are thinking of specific querying language - I would agree - we can already see that the use of archetypes at runtime changes how queries are written and does require some new kind of language. We have been experimenting on this, and are working on it... - thomas beale Rafal Szczesnia

Introducing myself + question

what languages openEHR components are released in depends heavily on who wants to build them, and the available resources, as well as what they are used for. In the current IT world, developers seem to want more Java and .Net based languages, and this probably also corresponds more to the avai

Introducing myself + question

Vincenzo Della Mea wrote: > Dear list members, > > my name is Vincenzo Della Mea, I'm researcher (Medical Informatics) > at the University of Udine, Italy, with interests until now directed > to telemedicine. > > I'm investigating now how to use OpenEHR as a teaching aid for a > Medical In

Introducing myself + question

Can you realease a C/C++ implementations? - Original Message - From: "Thomas Beale" To: "Vincenzo Della Mea" Cc: Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2003 12:47 PM Subject: Re: Introducing myself + question > > > Vincenzo Della Mea wrote: > > > Dear lis

Introducing myself + question

Dear list members, my name is Vincenzo Della Mea, I'm researcher (Medical Informatics) at the University of Udine, Italy, with interests until now directed to telemedicine. I'm investigating now how to use OpenEHR as a teaching aid for a Medical Informatics course: as a model, I think is ve