Pathology requirements UNITS

2003-10-27 Thread Sam Heard

Thomas

It is more that units match Force/Length^2 for pressure and it is an
expression that the property of pressure is the property of Force per
property of area - this does allow a very wide range of units to be used
if that is the requirement.

I am starting to see that things do get complicated out there in Unitsville.

Cheers, Sam

  Can we not work on a UNITS module where a test can be attached
 to a number
  of units where the conversion is not available. A clinician
 does not want to
  have to relearn the unit for the convenience of the application.
 

 I wonder if units should be considered part of a localsation profile?
 Currently you can specify units in an archetype in two ways:

 a) as the actual units you want to allow, e.g. units matches
 {mm[Hg]}, units
 matches {km, mi}

 b) property matches {pressure}, property matches {length}

 A nice alternative that Sam has thought of is:

 c) property matches {FORCE/LENGTH^2} -- same as pressure
 property matches {LENGTH/TIME}

 We are currentl working on including this in ADL.

 - thomas

 -
 If you have any questions about using this list,
 please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org


-
If you have any questions about using this list,
please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org



Pathology requirements UNITS

2003-10-24 Thread Sam Heard
Bhupinder

This is an interesting idea...but it raises issues as you have to have
normal ranges for each of these. I do not see why the results could not be
duplicated in multiple units is required - at present we do not have the
ability to add multiple values to a single element apart from as reference
ranges.

What do others think? I think Labs will probably push back on this one.

Sam

 -Original Message-
 From: owner-openehr-technical at openehr.org
 [mailto:owner-openehr-technical at openehr.org]On Behalf Of Bhupinder Singh
 Sent: Thursday, 23 October 2003 1:30 PM
 To: Sam Heard; Openehr-Technical
 Subject: Re: Pathology requirements UNITS


 Can we not work on a UNITS module where a test can be attached to a number
 of units where the conversion is not available. A clinician does
 not want to
 have to relearn the unit for the convenience of the application.

 Bhupinder



 - Original Message -
 From: Sam Heard sam.heard at bigpond.com
 To: Openehr-Technical openehr-technical at openehr.org
 Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 4:02 PM
 Subject: Pathology requirements UNITS


  UNITS
 
  There are a lot of units out there - it has been our idea to build a
  constraint model on units based on the property being measured. A good
  example is frequency can be '/{time unit}' (e.g. /min, /hr, /s) or 'Hz'.
 It
  is hoped that we can translate from one to the other as much as possible
 on
  this basis.
 
  It has come to my attention just how many units are out there and that
 some
  units are not translatable to another unit even when the property is the
  same without further information. The best known example is gm percent -
  which is the same as gm/100ml or gm/dl. This is a concentration
 but it is
  not possible to know the amount of substance (moles) without knowing the
  molecular weight of the substance. This means we will have to have units
  available in a property that are not translatable. We could
 separate these
  to MASS CONCENTRATION and CONCENTRATION as some have done - but I think
  clinicians will want to choose from as small as list as possible.
 
  We need some work done in this area and there are a number of documents
  available to get this as tidy as we can.
 
  Cheers, Sam
  
  Dr Sam Heard
  Ocean Informatics, openEHR
  Co-Chair, EHR-SIG, HL7
  Chair EHR IT-14-9-2, Standards Australia
  Hon. Senior Research Fellow, UCL, London
 
  105 Rapid Creek Rd
  Rapid Creek NT 0810
 
  Ph: +61 417 838 808
 
  sam.heard at bigpond.com
 
  www.openEHR.org
  www.HL7.org
  __
 
  -
  If you have any questions about using this list,
  please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org
 

 -
 If you have any questions about using this list,
 please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org


-
If you have any questions about using this list,
please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org



Pathology requirements UNITS

2003-10-24 Thread Vincent McCauley
Sam et al,
At least in the Australian context there are regulatory requirements
to report in Standard units only. So reporting the same
result in multiple different units is not possible.
What the standard units are, will vary across different realms

Regards
Vince

Dr Vincent McCauley

- Original Message - 
From: Sam Heard sam.he...@bigpond.com
To: Bhupinder Singh bobdog at sancharnet.in; Openehr-Technical
openehr-technical at openehr.org
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 11:35
Subject: RE: Pathology requirements UNITS


 Bhupinder

 This is an interesting idea...but it raises issues as you have to have
 normal ranges for each of these. I do not see why the results could not be
 duplicated in multiple units is required - at present we do not have the
 ability to add multiple values to a single element apart from as reference
 ranges.

 What do others think? I think Labs will probably push back on this one.

 Sam

  -Original Message-
  From: owner-openehr-technical at openehr.org
  [mailto:owner-openehr-technical at openehr.org]On Behalf Of Bhupinder Singh
  Sent: Thursday, 23 October 2003 1:30 PM
  To: Sam Heard; Openehr-Technical
  Subject: Re: Pathology requirements UNITS
 
 
  Can we not work on a UNITS module where a test can be attached to a
number
  of units where the conversion is not available. A clinician does
  not want to
  have to relearn the unit for the convenience of the application.
 
  Bhupinder
 
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Sam Heard sam.heard at bigpond.com
  To: Openehr-Technical openehr-technical at openehr.org
  Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 4:02 PM
  Subject: Pathology requirements UNITS
 
 
   UNITS
  
   There are a lot of units out there - it has been our idea to build a
   constraint model on units based on the property being measured. A good
   example is frequency can be '/{time unit}' (e.g. /min, /hr, /s) or 'Hz
'.
  It
   is hoped that we can translate from one to the other as much as
possible
  on
   this basis.
  
   It has come to my attention just how many units are out there and that
  some
   units are not translatable to another unit even when the property is
the
   same without further information. The best known example is gm
percent -
   which is the same as gm/100ml or gm/dl. This is a concentration
  but it is
   not possible to know the amount of substance (moles) without knowing
the
   molecular weight of the substance. This means we will have to have
units
   available in a property that are not translatable. We could
  separate these
   to MASS CONCENTRATION and CONCENTRATION as some have done - but I
think
   clinicians will want to choose from as small as list as possible.
  
   We need some work done in this area and there are a number of
documents
   available to get this as tidy as we can.
  
   Cheers, Sam
   
   Dr Sam Heard
   Ocean Informatics, openEHR
   Co-Chair, EHR-SIG, HL7
   Chair EHR IT-14-9-2, Standards Australia
   Hon. Senior Research Fellow, UCL, London
  
   105 Rapid Creek Rd
   Rapid Creek NT 0810
  
   Ph: +61 417 838 808
  
   sam.heard at bigpond.com
  
   www.openEHR.org
   www.HL7.org
   __
  
   -
   If you have any questions about using this list,
   please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org
  
 
  -
  If you have any questions about using this list,
  please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org
 

 -
 If you have any questions about using this list,
 please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org




-
If you have any questions about using this list,
please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org



Pathology requirements UNITS

2003-10-24 Thread Thomas Beale
Bhupinder Singh bobdog at sancharnet.in wrote:

 Can we not work on a UNITS module where a test can be attached to a number
 of units where the conversion is not available. A clinician does not want to
 have to relearn the unit for the convenience of the application.
 

I wonder if units should be considered part of a localsation profile?
Currently you can specify units in an archetype in two ways:

a) as the actual units you want to allow, e.g. units matches {mm[Hg]}, units
matches {km, mi}

b) property matches {pressure}, property matches {length}

A nice alternative that Sam has thought of is:

c) property matches {FORCE/LENGTH^2} -- same as pressure
property matches {LENGTH/TIME}

We are currentl working on including this in ADL.

- thomas

-
If you have any questions about using this list,
please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org



Pathology requirements UNITS

2003-10-22 Thread Bhupinder Singh
Can we not work on a UNITS module where a test can be attached to a number
of units where the conversion is not available. A clinician does not want to
have to relearn the unit for the convenience of the application.

Bhupinder



- Original Message - 
From: Sam Heard sam.he...@bigpond.com
To: Openehr-Technical openehr-technical at openehr.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 4:02 PM
Subject: Pathology requirements UNITS


 UNITS

 There are a lot of units out there - it has been our idea to build a
 constraint model on units based on the property being measured. A good
 example is frequency can be '/{time unit}' (e.g. /min, /hr, /s) or 'Hz'.
It
 is hoped that we can translate from one to the other as much as possible
on
 this basis.

 It has come to my attention just how many units are out there and that
some
 units are not translatable to another unit even when the property is the
 same without further information. The best known example is gm percent -
 which is the same as gm/100ml or gm/dl. This is a concentration but it is
 not possible to know the amount of substance (moles) without knowing the
 molecular weight of the substance. This means we will have to have units
 available in a property that are not translatable. We could separate these
 to MASS CONCENTRATION and CONCENTRATION as some have done - but I think
 clinicians will want to choose from as small as list as possible.

 We need some work done in this area and there are a number of documents
 available to get this as tidy as we can.

 Cheers, Sam
 
 Dr Sam Heard
 Ocean Informatics, openEHR
 Co-Chair, EHR-SIG, HL7
 Chair EHR IT-14-9-2, Standards Australia
 Hon. Senior Research Fellow, UCL, London

 105 Rapid Creek Rd
 Rapid Creek NT 0810

 Ph: +61 417 838 808

 sam.heard at bigpond.com

 www.openEHR.org
 www.HL7.org
 __

 -
 If you have any questions about using this list,
 please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org


-
If you have any questions about using this list,
please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org