Just for the record, which medical requirement makes measuring
micro-seconds necessary?
By the way, ISO allows one or more digits to represent a decimal
fraction of a second.
I don't have the original standard at hand, but Wikipedia says:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601
There is no
On 02-02-16 11:07, Koray Atalag wrote:
Hi Bert, I was saying ISO8601 do support this – it is openEHR that
constrains to milliseconds.
You are right, you do say that. I don't know if your code supports this,
because the ISO-time-string will be converted to a Time-class and must
have the
Cheers,
-koray
From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On
Behalf Of Bert Verhees
Sent: Tuesday, 2 February 2016 11:18 p.m.
To: For openEHR technical discussions
Subject: [FORGED] Re: [FORGED] Re: Representing microseconds in DateTime
On 02-02-16 11:07, Koray Atalag
February 2016 10:59 p.m.
To: openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org
Subject: [FORGED] Re: Representing microseconds in DateTime
Just for the record, which medical requirement makes measuring micro-seconds
necessary?
By the way, ISO allows one or more digits to represent a decimal fraction of a
second
I don't think there is any assumption that [,sss] means there are no
microseconds. The field is just called 'fractional_second' and it's a
Real (i.e. a float). We just used 'sss' as an arbitrary indicator of
fractional seconds (how many 's' do you want ;-)
- thomas
On 02/02/2016 09:51,
day, 3 February 2016 12:21 a.m.
To: openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org
Subject: Re: Representing microseconds in DateTime
I don't think there is any assumption that [,sss] means there are no
microseconds. The field is just called 'fractional_second' and it's a Real
(i.e. a float). We just used 's
Well, we can change the spec if people find it confusing, but as far as
I can see, it doesn't say anything about milliseconds or limiting
fractional seconds to 3 places.
But if you want to propose a wording change, feel free to raise a PR, we
can address it in the next minor release.
-
Of Bert Verhees
Sent: Tuesday, 2 February 2016 11:18 p.m.
To: For openEHR technical discussions
Subject: [FORGED] Re: [FORGED] Re: Representing microseconds in DateTime
On 02-02-16 11:07, Koray Atalag wrote:
Hi Bert, I was saying ISO8601 do support this - it is openEHR that constrains
to milliseconds
8 matches
Mail list logo
