,
Eng. Pablo Pazos Gutiérrez
http://cabolabs.com
From: heath.fran...@oceaninformatics.com
To: openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org; openehr-clini...@lists.openehr.org;
s...@lists.openehr.org
Subject: RE: Shouldn't INSTRUCTION_DETAILS.wf_details be archetypable?
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 00:15:09 +
Pablo Pazos Gutiérrez
> http://cabolabs.com
>
>
> From: pazospa...@hotmail.com
> To: openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org; openehr-clini...@lists.openehr.org;
> s...@lists.openehr.org
> Subject: Shouldn't INSTRUCTION_DETAILS.wf_details be ar
penehr.org] On
Behalf Of pablo pazos
Sent: Tuesday, 12 July 2016 2:36 PM
To: openeh technical <openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org>; openehr clinical
<openehr-clini...@lists.openehr.org>; s...@lists.openehr.org
Subject: Shouldn't INSTRUCTION_DETAILS.wf_details be archetypable?
Looking at the model, INSTRUCTION_DETAILS.wf_details is an ITEM_STRUCTURE, and
that lead me to think that should be archetypable.
Playing around with the archetype editor, it doesn't allow to archetype
anything inside INSTRUCTION.instruction_details.
Is this a problem of the AE or that structure
4 matches
Mail list logo
