think?
--
Kind regards,
Eng. Pablo Pazos Guti?rrez
http://cabolabs.com
From: heath.fran...@oceaninformatics.com
To: openehr-technical at lists.openehr.org
Subject: RE: Small question about commits and AUDIT_DETAILS.system_id
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2014 23:25:43 +
Hi Pablo,
No I don't
that is used by multiple
instances of 5 applications at 100 diff healthcare facilities managed by gov't
and non gov't organisations. There is only one system id for the repository.
Heath
Original Message
Subject: RE: Small question about commits
To: openehr-technical at lists.openehr.org
Subject: RE: Small question about commits and AUDIT_DETAILS.system_id
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2014 23:25:43 +
Hi Pablo,
No I don't agree. The point I tried to explain was that the system is the EHR
repository, not an application. So if there is one or more
Subject: RE: Small question about commits and AUDIT_DETAILS.system_id
From: pablo pazos pazospablo at hotmail.commailto:pazospa...@hotmail.com
To: openeh technical openehr-technical at
lists.openehr.orgmailto:openehr-technical at lists.openehr.org
CC:
Hi! Thanks for your answers
-technical at lists.openehr.org
Subject: Re: Small question about commits and AUDIT_DETAILS.system_id
Heath,
this is correct, you were not wrong for 10 y ;-)
We don't record the name or type or id of the application, and I
am not sure even
Subject: Re: Small question about commits and AUDIT_DETAILS.system_id
Heath,
this is correct, you were not wrong for 10 y ;-)
We don't record the name or type or id of the application, and I am
not sure even now if that would be of any use. I can't see that it
would be. The system_id
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 09:47:35 +0100
From: thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com
To: openehr-technical at lists.openehr.org
Subject: Re: Small question about commits and AUDIT_DETAILS.system_id
Heath,
this is correct, you were not wrong for 10 y ;-)
We don't record the name or type or id
Sep 2014 18:30:02 +0100
From: thomas.be...@oceaninformatics.com
To: openehr-technical at lists.openehr.org
Subject: Re: Small question about commits and AUDIT_DETAILS.system_id
Pablo,
you may have already done this, but please make sure
On 05/09/2014 18:39, pablo pazos wrote:
I found an issue mentioning the system_id but I don't know if it's
related with this thread (don't understand 100% the change
description), also it says that is closed:
http://www.openehr.org/issues/browse/SPEC-165
Pablo,
I would suggest just to
at lists.openehr.org
Subject: Re: Small question about commits and AUDIT_DETAILS.system_id
Hi Pablo,
the original idea is that it is an id more like emr1.my_domain.uy - i.e. an
actual host domain, so if the data are copied or moved elsewhere, the receiver
knows the original EMR system that the data were created
Heath,
this is correct, you were not wrong for 10 y ;-)
We don't record the name or type or id of the application, and I am not
sure even now if that would be of any use. I can't see that it would be.
The system_id is for exactly the purpose that Heath as explained here.
- thomas
On
Hi Pablo,
the original idea is that it is an id more like emr1.my_domain.uy -
i.e. an actual host domain, so if the data are copied or moved
elsewhere, the receiver knows the original EMR system that the data were
created on.
- thomas
On 20/08/2014 17:25, pablo pazos wrote:
Hi,
I'm
12 matches
Mail list logo
