Re: RM in OWL

I uploaded my ontologies to a Git repository, you can download here https://bitbucket.org/uhospital/openehr-rm. Yes, my approach to handle generics was to create a specialized version for every possible T type. For example, to create a DV_INTERVAL locked to DV_QUANTITY I would subclass

Re: RM in OWL

Hi Matheus, I'd be interested to hear about your problems. I'd also be curious to learn how you handled generics/parameterized types. Unless one defines a meta layer in owl with semantics for generics, I guess the only option is to materialize every possible type parameter T to its own type. All

Re: RM in OWL

Hi Seref, You can ask Jesualdo Fernández-Breis, they have developed model transformations based on ontologies. They used to have their demo system running, but it is not working now: http://sele.inf.um.es:9080/PoseacleConverter/ Yo can find his contact information here: http://webs.um.es/jfernand

Re: Shouldn't INSTRUCTION_DETAILS.wf_details be archetypable?

Hello Pablo, For these kinds of use cases I'd really recommend you to try LinkEHR. You should be able to define anything valid in the openEHR schema. We went to the extent to add an 'export' option to ensure that the output ADL could be read by Archetype Editor and Template Designer, so you don't

Re: Specs about ACTIVITY.timing still unclear

On 26/06/2016 22:23, pablo pazos wrote: Thanks for your message Ian, IMO avoiding the implementation of ACTIVITY.timing raises the question of why that was introduced in the model and if we should keep it or not. it was included on the assumption that timing would be represented as a

RE: Shouldn't INSTRUCTION_DETAILS.wf_details be archetypable?

Thanks Heath, I was under the impression that this was an AE constraint. I know the tool has it's restrictions and I would love to contribute, but I'm not very good with the technology stack on which the AE was created. I hope others can jump in and fill the blanks :) Thanks! -- Kind

RE: Specs about ACTIVITY.timing still unclear

We have more recently used iCAL for Instruction timing not associated with Medication orders such as service requests. It has served us well so far. Although FHIR has its own Appointment resource, they actually suggest the use of iCal instead of using this resource. I am not sure if iCal could