On Fri, 2024-02-23 at 11:02 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> As someone completely out of this, I want to ask: should genericarm64
> definition go to a mixin layer until it meets the criteria? Could it
> even be backported to LTS proper when it does? It's a machine
> definition, and so won't affec
As someone completely out of this, I want to ask: should genericarm64
definition go to a mixin layer until it meets the criteria? Could it
even be backported to LTS proper when it does? It's a machine
definition, and so won't affect users not using the machine.
I also object to the notion that thi
I'm now in a pretty horrible position.
We've now passed feature freeze. This freeze is pretty critical since
it concerns the LTS so if things miss this, they're out for the next
two years. The deadline shouldn't be a surprise to anyone.
I'd "committed" to genericarm64 being a feature for this rel
