Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] opkg-utils: Allow uppercase lettlers in package names

2011-05-20 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 20 mei 2011, om 20:35 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven: > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Andreas Oberritter > wrote: >> http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/2255/ should solve the problem. I >> was waiting for a second ack. >> >> Khem, if this fixes the problem for you, please send

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] distcc_2.18.3.bb: Fix compilation on uclibc

2011-05-20 Thread Phil Blundell
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 16:19 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > -DEPENDS = "avahi gtk+" > +DEPENDS = "avahi ${GTKDEP}" > +GTKDEP-libc-uclibc = "" > +GTKDEP = "gtk+" Does that really work? Surely it should be "GTKDEP_libc-uclibc". > -EXTRA_OECONF = " --with-gtk " > - > +EXTRA_OECONF_libc-glibc = " --with-gt

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] distcc_2.18.3.bb: Fix compilation on uclibc

2011-05-20 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 21 mei 2011, om 01:19 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven: > > do_install_append() { > install -d ${D}${sysconfdir}/init.d/ > install -d ${D}${sysconfdir}/default > install -m 0755 ${WORKDIR}/distcc ${D}${sysconfdir}/init.d/ > install -m 0755 ${WORKDIR}/default ${D}${sysconf

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] distcc_2.18.3.bb: Fix compilation on uclibc

2011-05-20 Thread Khem Raj
On (21/05/11 00:31), Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 16:19 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > We enable gtk/gnome in distcc that code uses loadavg() > > a function unimplemented in uclibc. Therefore for uclibc > > we disable gnome and gtk+ features in distcc > > > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] distcc_2.18.3.bb: Fix compilation on uclibc

2011-05-20 Thread Khem Raj
On (21/05/11 00:31), Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 16:19 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > We enable gtk/gnome in distcc that code uses loadavg() > > a function unimplemented in uclibc. Therefore for uclibc > > we disable gnome and gtk+ features in distcc > > > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] opkg_svn.bb: Install rcS.d into ${D} instead of ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}

2011-05-20 Thread Khem Raj
On (20/05/11 16:30), Saul Wold wrote: > On 05/20/2011 04:19 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > >Remove headerfix.patch, its already applied upstream > > > Minor nit, should be $D in the subject line also right? OK it should. I have amended the commit and refreshed pull branch > > Sau! > > >Signed-off-by: Kh

Re: [OE-core] [poky] [PATCH 0/1] switch to gcc 4.6.0 for x86 x86-64 & arm

2011-05-20 Thread Saul Wold
On 05/20/2011 04:52 PM, Darren Hart wrote: On 05/17/2011 11:07 AM, Nitin A Kamble wrote: From: Nitin A Kamble gcc 4.6.0 is good enough to switch for x86, x86-64& arm now. I could build core-sdk images and run them through the qemu machines when compiled with gcc 4.6.0. Has all of meta-int

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] switch to gcc 4.6.0 for x86 x86-64 & arm

2011-05-20 Thread Darren Hart
On 05/17/2011 11:07 AM, Nitin A Kamble wrote: > From: Nitin A Kamble > > gcc 4.6.0 is good enough to switch for x86, x86-64 & arm now. > > I could build core-sdk images and run them through the qemu machines > when compiled with gcc 4.6.0. Has all of meta-intel been built using 4.6.0? If not

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 00/12] 20-May-2011 Consolidated Pull

2011-05-20 Thread Saul Wold
On 05/20/2011 04:46 PM, Darren Hart wrote: On 05/20/2011 04:45 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 00:06 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: This is building green on x86 and ARM. This contains updated pull requests from Khem and Dexuan. I have some non-gplv3 fixes along with a fix to the u

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 00/12] 20-May-2011 Consolidated Pull

2011-05-20 Thread Darren Hart
On 05/20/2011 04:45 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 00:06 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: >> This is building green on x86 and ARM. >> >> This contains updated pull requests from Khem and Dexuan. I have some >> non-gplv3 fixes along with a fix to the u-boot patch due to a bad checksum.

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] distcc_2.18.3.bb: Fix compilation on uclibc

2011-05-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 16:19 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > We enable gtk/gnome in distcc that code uses loadavg() > a function unimplemented in uclibc. Therefore for uclibc > we disable gnome and gtk+ features in distcc > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj > --- > meta/recipes-devtools/distcc/distcc_2.18.3.bb

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] opkg_svn.bb: Install rcS.d into ${D} instead of ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}

2011-05-20 Thread Saul Wold
On 05/20/2011 04:19 PM, Khem Raj wrote: Remove headerfix.patch, its already applied upstream Minor nit, should be $D in the subject line also right? Sau! Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/headerfix.patch | 19 --- meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] distcc_2.18.3.bb: Fix compilation on uclibc

2011-05-20 Thread Khem Raj
We enable gtk/gnome in distcc that code uses loadavg() a function unimplemented in uclibc. Therefore for uclibc we disable gnome and gtk+ features in distcc Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- meta/recipes-devtools/distcc/distcc_2.18.3.bb | 17 - 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 de

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Opkg and distcc fix

2011-05-20 Thread Khem Raj
These are remaining patches which needed rework. The following changes since commit c26dadc799cd9c7df66c3bccfc9f21146c35625a: opkg_svn.bb: Install rcS.d into ${D} instead of ${IMAGE_ROOTFS} (2011-05-20 16:15:29 -0700) are available in the git repository at: g...@git.openembedded.org:openemb

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] opkg_svn.bb: Install rcS.d into ${D} instead of ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}

2011-05-20 Thread Khem Raj
Remove headerfix.patch, its already applied upstream Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/headerfix.patch | 19 --- meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_svn.bb |3 +-- 2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 meta/reci

Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv2 1/2] opkg_svn.bb: Install rcS.d into ${D} instead of ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}

2011-05-20 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 11:28 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Richard Purdie >> wrote: >> > >> > This needs to be $D, I didn't miss the brackets in my previous email :) >> > >> > >> >> but that wont be relative righ

Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv2 1/2] opkg_svn.bb: Install rcS.d into ${D} instead of ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}

2011-05-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 11:28 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > > > This needs to be $D, I didn't miss the brackets in my previous email :) > > > > > > but that wont be relative right ? it will encode current builddir into > sstate isnt it ? No,

Re: [OE-core] [oe] OE Changelog for 2011-4-8 to 2011-4-15

2011-05-20 Thread Jason Kridner
i'd be very interested in seeing this (weekly-only, without follow-ups, ie. in the bcc) on beaglebo...@googlegroups.com and would encourage linaro, yocto, ubuntu, debian, fedora, gentoo, libav, etc projects generating regular status reports relevant to ARM developers to do the same. On May 19, 201

Re: [OE-core] uclibc?

2011-05-20 Thread Khem Raj
On (16/05/11 21:11), Phil Blundell wrote: > On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 10:01 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: > > > I've just been trying to build a uclibc-based system from the current > > > head of oe-core but this doesn't seem to be something that work

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] image.bbclass: switch to OE's IMAGE_FEATURES

2011-05-20 Thread Chris Larson
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > Yes please :) > >> >> --- a/meta/classes/image.bbclass >> >> +++ b/meta/classes/image.bbclass >> >> @@ -11,8 +11,45 @@ INHIBIT_DEFAULT_DEPS = "1" >> >> >> >>  # "export IMAGE_BASENAME" not supported at this time >> >>  IMAGE_BASENAME[export

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] opkg-utils: Allow uppercase lettlers in package names

2011-05-20 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Andreas Oberritter wrote: > http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/2255/ should solve the problem. I > was waiting for a second ack. > > Khem, if this fixes the problem for you, please send an ack or push this > patch. > yes it does thanks. I meant to look for this

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] image.bbclass: switch to OE's IMAGE_FEATURES

2011-05-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 11:09 -0700, Chris Larson wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 14:06 -0700, Chris Larson wrote: > >> From: Chris Larson > >> > >> Currently, all image features are assumed to be package groups defined with > >> oe.packa

Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv2 1/2] opkg_svn.bb: Install rcS.d into ${D} instead of ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}

2011-05-20 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > This needs to be $D, I didn't miss the brackets in my previous email :) > > but that wont be relative right ? it will encode current builddir into sstate isnt it ? ___ Openembedded-core mailing

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] image.bbclass: switch to OE's IMAGE_FEATURES

2011-05-20 Thread Chris Larson
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 14:06 -0700, Chris Larson wrote: >> From: Chris Larson >> >> Currently, all image features are assumed to be package groups defined with >> oe.packagegroup (PACKAGE_GROUP_ = ""). >> >> Signed-off-by: Chris Larson >>

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] image.bbclass: switch to OE's IMAGE_FEATURES

2011-05-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 14:06 -0700, Chris Larson wrote: > From: Chris Larson > > Currently, all image features are assumed to be package groups defined with > oe.packagegroup (PACKAGE_GROUP_ = ""). > > Signed-off-by: Chris Larson > --- > meta/classes/core-image.bbclass | 112 > ++-

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] Add support for remote layering.

2011-05-20 Thread Jeremy Puhlman
> I think it's just about the placing of these defaults, I don't necessarily > object to having them in the first place. My main concerns are around the > defaults for variables like TMPDIR which may end up actually being used in > preference to what the user has set in local.conf. Obviously we

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] Add support for remote layering.

2011-05-20 Thread Paul Eggleton
Returning a discussion that has begun on the wiki to the mailing list: Jeremy Puhlman wrote: > Paul Eggleton wrote: >> A good start but naturally we want to avoid the bits that hard-code >> variable values. I wonder about situations where people want their own >> versions of layers or to share rem

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/5] Variable typing & reworked imports handling

2011-05-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 14:02 -0700, Chris Larson wrote: > From: Chris Larson > > Pull URL: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib > Branch: kergoth/oe-sync-base > Browse: > http://git.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=kergoth/oe-sync-base > > Thanks, >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] opkg-utils: Allow uppercase lettlers in package names

2011-05-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 18:05 +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote: > On 05/20/2011 05:01 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 07:45 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > >> On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 14:09 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > >>> Some packages have uppercase letters in their names e.g. > >>> efikam

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] opkg-utils: Allow uppercase lettlers in package names

2011-05-20 Thread Andreas Oberritter
On 05/20/2011 05:01 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 07:45 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: >> On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 14:09 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >>> Some packages have uppercase letters in their names e.g. >>> efikamx kernel. We allow uppercase character with >>> uppercase-letters.patch

Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv2 0/3] Fix recipes to build with uclibc

2011-05-20 Thread Saul Wold
On 05/19/2011 05:02 PM, Khem Raj wrote: This series addresses review from RP The following changes since commit bcf6445c5e77ab3563dc2dfa56d17ae811eb813d: opkg_svn.bb: Install rcS.d into ${D} instead of ${IMAGE_ROOTFS} (2011-05-19 16:56:45 -0700) are available in the git repository at: g

Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv2 0/2] opkg updates

2011-05-20 Thread Saul Wold
On 05/19/2011 04:52 PM, Khem Raj wrote: This incorporates the comments from RP The following changes since commit b0cbb0f5a98e9406a5007aa5ce5091c1be8e82db: opkg_svn.bb: Install rcS.d into ${D} instead of ${IMAGE_ROOTFS} (2011-05-19 16:45:03 -0700) are available in the git repository at:

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1][RFC][v3] package-index.bb: add support for rpm and deb.

2011-05-20 Thread Saul Wold
On 05/18/2011 06:10 AM, Dexuan Cui wrote: From: Dexuan Cui [YOCTO #1024] Currently package-index.bb only supports ipk. This commit adds the support for rpm and deb, too. -- How to generate and use repos: 1) run "bitbake package-index" after building some target, e.g

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] switch to gcc 4.6.0 for x86 x86-64 & arm

2011-05-20 Thread Saul Wold
On 05/17/2011 11:07 AM, Nitin A Kamble wrote: From: Nitin A Kamble gcc 4.6.0 is good enough to switch for x86, x86-64& arm now. I could build core-sdk images and run them through the qemu machines when compiled with gcc 4.6.0. mips& ppc are still not ready, mainly the kernel compilation issu

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] opkg-utils: Allow uppercase lettlers in package names

2011-05-20 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 20 mei 2011, om 17:01 heeft Phil Blundell het volgende geschreven: > On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 07:45 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: >> On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 14:09 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >>> Some packages have uppercase letters in their names e.g. >>> efikamx kernel. We allow uppercase character with

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] opkg-utils: Allow uppercase lettlers in package names

2011-05-20 Thread Phil Blundell
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 07:45 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 14:09 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > Some packages have uppercase letters in their names e.g. > > efikamx kernel. We allow uppercase character with > > uppercase-letters.patch > > This is not a good idea. Uppercase charac

Re: [OE-core] New fetcher failure for local files

2011-05-20 Thread Khem Raj
On 5/20/2011 12:25 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: Hi, Since a few days the fetcher is behaving strangely: NOTE: package linux-omap-psp-2.6.32-r99b+gitr5fc29e7b2a76a64a739f857858ef0b98294aa155: task do_fetch: Started ERROR: Function 'Fetcher failure for URL: 'file://defconfig'. Unable to fetch URL file

Re: [OE-core] [oe] OE Changelog for 2011-4-8 to 2011-4-15

2011-05-20 Thread Mark Hatle
I like this, the one suggest I have is at the TOP of the email, briefly note which repositories are covered in this. I didn't notice openembedded-core the first I looked at it, so I didn't think it was there. --Mark On 5/20/11 12:55 AM, Anders Darander wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 20:43, Cli

Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv2 2/3] distcc_2.18.3.bb: Fix compilation on uclibc

2011-05-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 17:02 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > We enable gtk/gnome in distcc that code uses loadavg() > a function unimplemented in uclibc. Therefore for uclibc > we disable gnome and gtk+ features in distcc > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj > --- > meta/recipes-devtools/distcc/distcc_2.18.3.bb

Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv2 1/2] opkg_svn.bb: Install rcS.d into ${D} instead of ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}

2011-05-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 16:52 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > Remove headerfix.patch, its already applied upstream > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj > --- > meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/headerfix.patch | 19 --- > meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_svn.bb |3 +-- > 2 files change

Re: [OE-core] Is BBCLASSEXTEND in .bbappend supposed to work?

2011-05-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 05:33 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 05/19/2011 04:53 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 21:47 +0200, Simon Busch wrote: > >> > >> I discoverd the same behaviour today. Is there already something fix to > >> get bitbake to evaluate the bbappend file after crea

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 00/12] 20-May-2011 Consolidated Pull

2011-05-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 00:06 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > This is building green on x86 and ARM. > > This contains updated pull requests from Khem and Dexuan. I have some > non-gplv3 fixes along with a fix to the u-boot patch due to a bad checksum. > > I have again included the gcc 4.6 enabler for x

Re: [OE-core] Is BBCLASSEXTEND in .bbappend supposed to work?

2011-05-20 Thread Gary Thomas
On 05/19/2011 04:53 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 21:47 +0200, Simon Busch wrote: On 18.04.2011 14:17, Gary Thomas wrote: On 04/18/2011 05:34 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 18 apr 2011, om 13:28 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 12:55 +0200, Koen

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH (v2,resend) 0/3] Rework the devshell

2011-05-20 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Friday 20 May 2011 01:02:58 Joshua Lock wrote: > Speaking of devshell, last I tried (and Paul E can correct me here) > Konsole doesn't wait when it's spawned so is currently pretty useless > for devshell (bitbake continues as if the devshell had finished and if a > patch hasn't applied). I

Re: [OE-core] New fetcher failure for local files

2011-05-20 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 20 mei 2011, om 09:25 heeft Koen Kooi het volgende geschreven: > Hi, > > Since a few days the fetcher is behaving strangely: > > NOTE: package > linux-omap-psp-2.6.32-r99b+gitr5fc29e7b2a76a64a739f857858ef0b98294aa155: task > do_fetch: Started > ERROR: Function 'Fetcher failure for URL: 'fi

[OE-core] New fetcher failure for local files

2011-05-20 Thread Koen Kooi
Hi, Since a few days the fetcher is behaving strangely: NOTE: package linux-omap-psp-2.6.32-r99b+gitr5fc29e7b2a76a64a739f857858ef0b98294aa155: task do_fetch: Started ERROR: Function 'Fetcher failure for URL: 'file://defconfig'. Unable to fetch URL file://defconfig from any source.' failed It

[OE-core] [PATCH 09/12] package-index.bb: add support for deb and rpm.

2011-05-20 Thread Saul Wold
From: Dexuan Cui [YOCTO #1024] Currently package-index.bb only supports ipk. This commit adds the support for rpm and deb, too. -- How to generate and use repos: 1) run "bitbake package-index" after building some target, e.g., core-image-sato-sdk; 2) export ${DEPLOY

[OE-core] [PATCH 12/12] u-boot: fix LIC_FILE_CHKSUM

2011-05-20 Thread Saul Wold
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold --- meta/recipes-bsp/uboot/u-boot_git.bb |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/uboot/u-boot_git.bb b/meta/recipes-bsp/uboot/u-boot_git.bb index 4c8f5df..bd619ed 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-bsp/uboot/u-boot_git.bb +++ b/m

[OE-core] [PATCH 01/12] tcmode-default: switch to gcc 4.6.0 for x86, x86-64 & arm

2011-05-20 Thread Saul Wold
From: Nitin A Kamble mips & ppc are not ready yet. Waiting for kernel issues to be fixed. Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble --- meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc |8 ++-- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc b

[OE-core] [PATCH 10/12] ed (GPLv2): remove --disable-silent-rules

2011-05-20 Thread Saul Wold
Older version of configure in ed does not like this option, so remove it from CONFIGUREOPTS Signed-off-by: Saul Wold --- meta/recipes-extended/ed/ed_0.5.bb |4 +++- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/ed/ed_0.5.bb b/meta/recipes-extended/ed/

[OE-core] [PATCH 06/12] distcc_2.18.3.bb: Fix compilation on uclibc

2011-05-20 Thread Saul Wold
From: Khem Raj We enable gtk/gnome in distcc that code uses loadavg() a function unimplemented in uclibc. Therefore for uclibc we disable gnome and gtk+ features in distcc Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- meta/recipes-devtools/distcc/distcc_2.18.3.bb | 15 ++- 1 files changed, 10 inse

[OE-core] [PATCH 11/12] gettext (gplv2): add virtual/gettext to PROVIDES list

2011-05-20 Thread Saul Wold
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold --- meta/recipes-core/gettext/gettext_0.16.1.bb |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/gettext/gettext_0.16.1.bb b/meta/recipes-core/gettext/gettext_0.16.1.bb index 754b0ad..73e5f55 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-core/get

[OE-core] [PATCH 08/12] opkg-utils: Synchronise with OE

2011-05-20 Thread Saul Wold
From: Khem Raj Import mtime-int.patch from OE commit c81990aecae3bdf70a7c924699776b248ab7a006 Pass LDFLAGS to linker to avoid missing GNU_HASH QA errors Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- .../opkg-utils/opkg-utils/mtime-int.patch | 29 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils

[OE-core] [PATCH 07/12] opkg_svn.bb: Install rcS.d into ${D} instead of ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}

2011-05-20 Thread Saul Wold
From: Khem Raj Remove headerfix.patch, its already applied upstream Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/headerfix.patch | 19 --- meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_svn.bb |3 +-- 2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) delete mode

[OE-core] [PATCH 03/12] conf: Create distro overridable IMAGE varibales

2011-05-20 Thread Saul Wold
From: Khem Raj With default-setup being pulled in via bitbake.conf and task-core-boot being pulled into all images in distros, we need to have some variables that distro's can override if need be This is a backport from angstrom/OE. It will help distros which e.g. would like to use busybox-mdev i

[OE-core] [PATCH 05/12] nfs-utils_1.2.3.bb: Fix compile failure on uclibc

2011-05-20 Thread Saul Wold
From: Khem Raj libio.h is not needed even in case of eglibc but still the patch is uclibc specific Refreshed nfs-utils-1.0.6-uclibc.patch against nfs-utils_1.2.3 no code change Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- .../nfs-utils/nfs-utils-1.0.6-uclibc.patch | 16 +++- .../nfs-utils/nf

[OE-core] [PATCH 00/12] 20-May-2011 Consolidated Pull

2011-05-20 Thread Saul Wold
Richard, This is building green on x86 and ARM. This contains updated pull requests from Khem and Dexuan. I have some non-gplv3 fixes along with a fix to the u-boot patch due to a bad checksum. I have again included the gcc 4.6 enabler for x86 and arm, the kernel updates are in place. Feel fre

[OE-core] [PATCH 04/12] uclibc/site_config/funcs: getloadavg is unimplemented

2011-05-20 Thread Saul Wold
From: Khem Raj Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- meta/recipes-core/uclibc/site_config/funcs |1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/uclibc/site_config/funcs b/meta/recipes-core/uclibc/site_config/funcs index ccc8539..79a3c19 100644 --- a/meta/recipe

[OE-core] [PATCH 02/12] modutils-cross: fix install issue

2011-05-20 Thread Saul Wold
[YOCTO #1055] Signed-off-by: Saul Wold --- .../modutils/modutils-cross_2.4.27.bb |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/modutils/modutils-cross_2.4.27.bb b/meta/recipes-kernel/modutils/modutils-cross_2.4.27.bb index d772516..

Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv2 2/3] distcc_2.18.3.bb: Fix compilation on uclibc

2011-05-20 Thread Phil Blundell
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 17:02 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > -DEPENDS = "avahi gtk+" > +DEPENDS = "avahi" > +DEPENDS_append-libc-glibc = " gtk+ " If uclibc is alone in not having this function then it would be better as: gtkdepends = "gtk+" gtkdepends_libc-uclibc = "" DEPENDS = "avahi ${gtkdepends}" or