From: Kang Kai kai.k...@windriver.com
Build ghostscript-native fails on a i686 machine because it can't get
the source objarch.h and soobjarch.h, and .h files are not needed for
native package, so update the SRC_URI to fix it.
Signed-off-by: Kang Kai kai.k...@windriver.com
---
Just for testing whether I can post to this mailing list.
--
Thanks
Robert
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Op 10 jun 2011, om 02:57 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven:
ONLINE_PACKAGE_MANAGEMENT does not exist on oe-core
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
---
meta/recipes-extended/sysklogd/sysklogd.inc |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
[YOCTO #1155]
I thought git-native could depend on perl-native-runtime and tests on
Ubuntu 9.04/10.10 and Fedora 13 show it could buid fine (looks these distros
install perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker by default).
However Joshua reported on Fedora 15 i686 host, git-native can't build unless
he manually
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 10:25 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
This can't be right. I guess that would be a good thing for
recipe-sanity to test for in fact.
... except that this wouldn't have helped because oe-core doesn't
currently have recipe_sanity at all. Heh. I'll send a patch for that
later,
From: Xiaofeng Yan xiaofeng@windriver.com
Hi Saul,
I submit this patch for adding library libQtopenGL* to lsb image. We make lsb
test on the following platform with default setting mesa-xlib so far.
emenlow, mpc8315e, qemux86,qemux86-64 ,jasperforest
Pull URL:
From: Xiaofeng Yan xiaofeng@windriver.com
Fix bug [#YOCTO 1020]
It is part of fixing bug [YOCTO #1020]. If another patch to add configuration
for compiling qtopengl to poky-lsb.conf is merged to poky, \
then this bug will be fixed. LSB Test Suite need library libQtOpenGL* in an
lsb image.
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 08:09 -0500, Mike Westerhof wrote:
I fear that the use of ccache is inherently risky with OE. Given the
(relatively common) case where the user blows away their TMPDIR in order
to get a full, clean rebuild after an update to the toolchain is make,
it is possible that
On 6/10/2011 8:09 AM, Mike Westerhof wrote:
On 6/10/2011 12:48 AM, Robert Yang wrote:
On 06/10/2011 11:26 AM, wenzong fan wrote:
Original Message
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 15:40 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
On 06/02/2011 08:11 PM, wenzong fan wrote:
Hi Folks,
Please help me to
Without this you get:
| libc/sysdeps/linux/common/epoll.c: In function '__libc_epoll_pwait':
| libc/sysdeps/linux/common/epoll.c:71:80: error: memory input 7 is not
directly addressable
| libc/sysdeps/linux/common/epoll.c:75:86: error: memory input 7 is not
directly addressable
| make: ***
Hi,
For people not keeping an eye on meta-gnome, it reached a milestone this week:
a usefull looking[1] GNOME 2.32 desktop. With the current bits in oe-core,
meta-oe and meta-gnome you can build an image with gdm, gnome-panel,
gnome-session, nautilus metacity and gnome-disk-utility. It's still
Since updating this morning, it seems that oe-core master now requires
bitbake 1.13.1 to be installed. (I don't recall any discussion of that
change or the reasons for it, but no doubt they are good ones.)
I couldn't find a 1.13.1 tag (or in fact any tags after 1.12.0) in the
bitbake repository
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 17:57 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
-RDEPENDS_${PN}_append = ${@base_conditional(ONLINE_PACKAGE_MANAGEMENT,
none, , update-rc.d, d)}
+RDEPENDS_${PN}_append = ${@oe.utils.contains(IMAGE_FEATURES,
package-management, update-rc.d, , d)}
This sort of thing shouldn't be
Op 10 jun 2011, om 16:09 heeft Phil Blundell het volgende geschreven:
Since updating this morning, it seems that oe-core master now requires
bitbake 1.13.1 to be installed. (I don't recall any discussion of that
change or the reasons for it, but no doubt they are good ones.)
I couldn't
Op 9 jun 2011, om 14:53 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven:
Fixes ip route get not producing any output (a regression in 2.6.35).
See http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdevm=129442470405398w=2 and
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdevm=130038222321440w=2 for a list of
other changes since
On 06/09/2011 01:08 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 09:04 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 09:55 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
On 06/02/2011 09:35 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 09:28 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
Even if we're using the sstate
cache
On 06/09/2011 01:04 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 09:55 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
On 06/02/2011 09:35 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 09:28 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
Even if we're using the sstate
cache from /foo/oecore/tmp over in /bar/oecore/tmp (and
This is a verbatim copy of the corresponding class from oe master.
Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell ph...@gnu.org
---
meta/classes/recipe_sanity.bbclass | 179
1 files changed, 179 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644
On 06/09/2011 07:54 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On 06/09/2011 04:51 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On 06/09/2011 03:40 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
On 06/02/2011 08:11 PM, wenzong fan wrote:
Hi Folks,
Please help me to review the design document for ccache-native, and
I also have two questions about it, any answers
On Friday 10 June 2011 15:19:00 Koen Kooi wrote:
When building I get this:
WARNING: the following files were installed but not shipped in any package:
WARNING: /lib/tc/m_xt.so
WARNING: /lib/tc/m_ipt.so
I don't know anything about iproute2, so I can't say if it's bad or good to
leave
On Thursday 09 June 2011 18:15:45 Mark Hatle wrote:
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/pseudo/pseudo_1.1.1.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/pseudo/pseudo_1.1.1.bb
@@ -1,9 +1,10 @@
require pseudo.inc
-PR = r0
+PR = r1
I may be mistaken, but it seems to me that every time we need to rebuild
On 6/10/11 9:28 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
This is a verbatim copy of the corresponding class from oe master.
Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell ph...@gnu.org
---
One of the new features we have in oe-core (likely not well publicized) is
SUMMARY information.
If this patch goes in, we likely should
On 6/10/11 10:02 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Thursday 09 June 2011 18:15:45 Mark Hatle wrote:
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/pseudo/pseudo_1.1.1.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/pseudo/pseudo_1.1.1.bb
@@ -1,9 +1,10 @@
require pseudo.inc
-PR = r0
+PR = r1
I may be mistaken, but it seems to
On 06/10/2011 07:01 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
This chunk of python code has been around for a while (witness the
comment about gcc 3.4.0) and predates the availability of
COMPATIBLE_HOST. Rewrite it using a more modern idiom.
Signed-off-by: Phil Blundellph...@gnu.org
Acked-by: Khem Raj
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 23:26 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
Kang Kai (1):
ghostscript: update SRC_URI
Nitin A Kamble (1):
gcc: rebase the patch to avoid patch rejection
This was a disaster. It breaks the build and is huge, thereby clogging
up the source control system web interface etc.
I
On 06/10/2011 09:33 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 23:26 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
Kang Kai (1):
ghostscript: update SRC_URI
Nitin A Kamble (1):
gcc: rebase the patch to avoid patch rejection
This was a disaster. It breaks the build and is huge, thereby clogging
up the
Op 10 jun 2011, om 18:33 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 23:26 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
Kang Kai (1):
ghostscript: update SRC_URI
Nitin A Kamble (1):
gcc: rebase the patch to avoid patch rejection
This was a disaster. It breaks the build and is
On 06/10/2011 02:25 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 23:26 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
+DEPENDS_libpci-staticdev = libpci-dev (= ${EXTENDPKGV})
This can't be right. I guess that would be a good thing for
recipe-sanity to test for in fact.
It's not, I did not catch the cut and
Signed-off-by: Anders Darander and...@chargestorm.se
---
meta/recipes-devtools/perl/perl-native_5.12.3.bb |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/perl/perl-native_5.12.3.bb
b/meta/recipes-devtools/perl/perl-native_5.12.3.bb
index
A follow-up with this.
For an RPM based system this should be fairly easy to implement. However, after
doing investigation on deb and opkg (related), I'm not sure this is going to
work.
From my investigation, deb formatted packages have no concept of directory
ownership. Directories just
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 11:36 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
+FILES_eglibc-dev_append += ${bindir}/rpcgen ${base_libdir}/*.o
${datadir}/aclocal
+FILES_eglibc-staticdev_append += ${libdir}/*.a ${base_libdir}/*.a
You need to make sure that libc_nonshared.a goes into -dev rather than
-staticdev
On (09/06/11 23:26), Saul Wold wrote:
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com
---
meta/recipes-bsp/pciutils/pciutils_3.1.7.bb|7 -
.../wireless-tools/wireless-tools_29.bb|9 +--
meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc-package.inc|8 --
OE-TSC minutes 26-May-2011
Attending: Tom, Khem, Koen, Richard, Mark
Apologies: Stefan
Sitting in on drums: Jefro
01) Meeting chair
Jefro
02) Ask for topics
RP - bitbake and override expansion
03) Action items from last week:
-- GNOME discussion to ml (all)
hasn't happened yet
-- release
OE-TSC minutes 02-Jun-2011
Attending: Koen, Khem, Richard, Tom, Mark (had to leave early)
Apologies: Stefan
Agenda:
01) Meeting chair
RP
02) Ask for topics
infrastructure SIG
mailinglist police
-- RP to send email to yocto folks
khem notes that oe-core ml does not enable patch attachments
Op 11 jun 2011, om 00:22 heeft Scott Garman het volgende geschreven:
On 06/09/2011 02:25 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 9 jun 2011, om 23:23 heeft Scott Garman het volgende geschreven:
On 06/09/2011 01:50 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 3 jun 2011, om 01:50 heeft Scott Garman het volgende geschreven:
On 06/10/2011 02:36 PM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 11:36 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
+FILES_eglibc-dev_append += ${bindir}/rpcgen ${base_libdir}/*.o
${datadir}/aclocal
+FILES_eglibc-staticdev_append += ${libdir}/*.a ${base_libdir}/*.a
You need to make sure that libc_nonshared.a
36 matches
Mail list logo
