Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 5/7] pixman: updat to 0.24.4

2012-03-01 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 1 mrt. 2012, om 08:26 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven: Signed-off-by: Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com --- .../{pixman_0.24.2.bb = pixman_0.24.4.bb} |7 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) rename meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/{pixman_0.24.2.bb =

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/4] self-hosted: Fix multiple libx11 error

2012-03-01 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 1 mrt. 2012, om 08:46 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven: From: Zhai Edwin edwin.z...@intel.com Self-hosted needs package libx11-dev, which is ambiguous as virtual/libx11 is provided by libx11 or libx11-trim. This patch explictly set the perferred one, libx11-trim-dev, to avoid

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/4] self-hosted-image: Create a VMDK image with correct SYSLINUX_* settings

2012-03-01 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 1 mrt. 2012, om 08:46 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven: Signed-off-by: Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com --- meta/recipes-core/images/self-hosted-image.bb | 16 ++-- 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/4] self-hosted-image: Create a VMDK image with correct SYSLINUX_* settings

2012-03-01 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 09:15 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 1 mrt. 2012, om 08:46 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven: Signed-off-by: Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com --- meta/recipes-core/images/self-hosted-image.bb | 16 ++-- 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/6] insane.bbclass: fix elf.arch not matching

2012-03-01 Thread Jegan Chandru
Hi, I am trying to built a x86_64 bit target filesystem on a 64 bit host(Ubuntu-11.10) using yocto poky framework. I encountered the same problem while compiling the kernel for my target. *WARNING: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) on

Re: [OE-core] [oe-core][PATCHv2 2/5] bitbake.conf: remove TARGET_ARCH from in SDKPATH

2012-03-01 Thread Khem Raj
On 02/25/2012 11:49 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: +SDK_NAME_PREFIX = oecore should this be weak assignment ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Re: [OE-core] [oe-core][PATCHv2 2/5] bitbake.conf: remove TARGET_ARCH from in SDKPATH

2012-03-01 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 01:23:29AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote: On 02/25/2012 11:49 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: +SDK_NAME_PREFIX = oecore should this be weak assignment Yeah, probably could be (I'm not overwritting this from my distro conf so I haven't tried), but SDK_NAME assignment also wasn't weak

[OE-core] [PATCH] site.conf.sample: Fix broken SOCKS proxy setup and configuration

2012-03-01 Thread Richard Purdie
From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez inaky.perez-gonza...@intel.com SOCKS proxy specification with git was using conflicting methods and thus was failing when mixed SOCKS needs were in place (requiring no proxy for some hosts and proxy for the rest) - GIT_PROXY_COMMAND is an environment variable GIT uses

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: Pick up ${NM} from the environment.

2012-03-01 Thread Khem Raj
On 02/27/2012 11:36 PM, James Limbouris wrote: Signed-off-by: James Limbouris ja...@digitalmatter.com.au --- .../gdk-pixbuf-2.24.0/configure_nm.patch | 19 +++ meta/recipes-gnome/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf_2.24.0.bb |3 ++- 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/6] insane.bbclass: fix elf.arch not matching

2012-03-01 Thread Khem Raj
On 03/01/2012 01:04 AM, Jegan Chandru wrote: Hi, I am trying to built a x86_64 bit target filesystem on a 64 bit host(Ubuntu-11.10) using yocto poky framework. I encountered the same problem while compiling the kernel for my target. /WARNING: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to

Re: [OE-core] psuedo-native strangeness on 64 bit build machine

2012-03-01 Thread Khem Raj
On 02/29/2012 07:12 AM, Steve Sakoman wrote: On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Steve Sakoman sako...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Petr Štetiar yn...@true.cz wrote: Now it's impossible to finish the build, the most noticeable failure is gcc, which fails for me in patching

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] libx11-1.4.4: Add patch makekeys_crosscompile.patch

2012-03-01 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Donnerstag, den 01.03.2012, 14:14 +0800 schrieb Xiaofeng Yan: On 2012年02月09日 17:06, Paul Menzel wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 09.02.2012, 16:05 +0800 schrieb Xiaofeng Yan: From: Xiaofeng Yanxiaofeng@windriver.com LSB 4.1 complain a host contamination error from libx11 because of

[OE-core] [PATCH] libx11-trim/diet: Add RPROVIDES for libx11-dev

2012-03-01 Thread Richard Purdie
We have things that depend on libx11-dev, this patch ensures the -trim and -diet versions provide it. This resolves some multiple providers warnings. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org --- Koen/Saul: This is how I think we should be fixing the libx11 issues...

[OE-core] [PATCH] libx11-trim: Drop obsolete 1.3.4 version

2012-03-01 Thread Richard Purdie
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org --- diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-trim-1.3.4/include_fix.patch b/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-trim-1.3.4/include_fix.patch deleted file mode 100644 index eeb4175..000 ---

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libx11-trim/diet: Add RPROVIDES for libx11-dev

2012-03-01 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 11:55:16AM +, Richard Purdie wrote: We have things that depend on libx11-dev, this patch ensures the -trim and -diet versions provide it. This resolves some multiple providers warnings. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org It's

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libx11-trim/diet: Add RPROVIDES for libx11-dev

2012-03-01 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 1 mrt. 2012, om 12:55 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: We have things that depend on libx11-dev, this patch ensures the -trim and -diet versions provide it. This resolves some multiple providers warnings. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org ---

[OE-core] multiple kernel builds

2012-03-01 Thread Sergey Lapin
Hi, all! How could I achieve multiple kernel packages builds in single build? I need multiple kernel configurations for single hardware (which will live in single build and booted on request). So I need to put 2 uImages on one ubifs partition or different mtd partitions, which is ok. But I need

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libx11-trim/diet: Add RPROVIDES for libx11-dev

2012-03-01 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 13:11 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 1 mrt. 2012, om 12:55 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: We have things that depend on libx11-dev, this patch ensures the -trim and -diet versions provide it. This resolves some multiple providers warnings.

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libx11-trim/diet: Add RPROVIDES for libx11-dev

2012-03-01 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 1 mrt. 2012, om 13:50 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 13:11 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 1 mrt. 2012, om 12:55 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: We have things that depend on libx11-dev, this patch ensures the -trim and -diet versions

Re: [OE-core] multiple kernel builds

2012-03-01 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 1 mrt. 2012, om 13:50 heeft Sergey Lapin het volgende geschreven: Hi, all! How could I achieve multiple kernel packages builds in single build? I need multiple kernel configurations for single hardware (which will live in single build and booted on request). So I need to put 2

Re: [OE-core] RFC: Porting KDE Plasma Active (WIP)

2012-03-01 Thread Samuel Stirtzel
Just to let you know that I'm still working on this. The git repository (at [1]) shows what was currently done, since kdelibs builds now it could be possible to port other programs that depend on it. The good and the bad news: Good: * Most things will compile and install * Workarounds should

Re: [OE-core] RFC: Porting KDE Plasma Active (WIP)

2012-03-01 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 1 mrt. 2012, om 14:24 heeft Samuel Stirtzel het volgende geschreven: Just to let you know that I'm still working on this. The git repository (at [1]) shows what was currently done, since kdelibs builds now it could be possible to port other programs that depend on it. The good and

Re: [OE-core] RFC: Porting KDE Plasma Active (WIP)

2012-03-01 Thread Samuel Stirtzel
2012/3/1 Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net: * The user has to install kdelibsX-dev (X is either version 4 or 5) since KDE (like Koen already stated) needs to execute KDE/Qt programs that depend on the whole KDE stack again in a native flavor. Can we just build them natively and put them in

Re: [OE-core] psuedo-native strangeness on 64 bit build machine

2012-03-01 Thread Steve Sakoman
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 2:33 AM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote: On 02/29/2012 07:12 AM, Steve Sakoman wrote: On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Steve Sakoman sako...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Petr Štetiar yn...@true.cz wrote: Now it's impossible to finish the build,

Re: [OE-core] RFC: Porting KDE Plasma Active (WIP)

2012-03-01 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Thursday 01 March 2012 15:15:11 Samuel Stirtzel wrote: For the packages kconfig_compiler (needs libkdecore) and makekdewidgets (needs libkdecore and libkdeui) it might work, as long as the programs got their libraries. Since building kdelibs native in OpenEmbedded would need a full

Re: [OE-core] [oe] Buildhistory, was Re: do rootfs does not create log files

2012-03-01 Thread Andreas Müller
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com wrote: On Thursday 01 March 2012 13:38:04 Andreas Müller wrote: Would it be big effort to have the package scripts (pre-/postinst, postrm) handled by buildhistory? Do you mean you would like the contents of the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] initscripts: Properly handle new timestamp format

2012-03-01 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 07:43 -0700, Gary Thomas wrote: Recent changes have attempted to make consistant use of /etc/timestamp In particular 5aab665 initscripts: Make /etc/timestamp consistent again. 173a48f image.bbclass: Ensure timestamp matches format used in initscripts after recent

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] initscripts: Properly handle new timestamp format

2012-03-01 Thread Gary Thomas
On 2012-03-01 07:59, Richard Purdie wrote: On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 07:43 -0700, Gary Thomas wrote: Recent changes have attempted to make consistant use of /etc/timestamp In particular 5aab665 initscripts: Make /etc/timestamp consistent again. 173a48f image.bbclass: Ensure timestamp matches

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] initscripts: Properly handle new timestamp format

2012-03-01 Thread Gary Thomas
On 2012-03-01 08:11, Gary Thomas wrote: On 2012-03-01 07:59, Richard Purdie wrote: On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 07:43 -0700, Gary Thomas wrote: Recent changes have attempted to make consistant use of /etc/timestamp In particular 5aab665 initscripts: Make /etc/timestamp consistent again. 173a48f

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] image_types.bbclass: fix link creation failure if the target already exists

2012-03-01 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 21:33 +0100, Petr Štetiar wrote: | ln: failed to create symbolic link `beagleboard/systemd-image-beagleboard.tar.bz2': File exists NOTE: package systemd-image-1.0-r0: task do_rootfs: Failed Signed-off-by: Petr Štetiar yn...@true.cz ---

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] initscripts: Properly handle new timestamp format

2012-03-01 Thread Gary Thomas
On 2012-03-01 08:44, Richard Purdie wrote: On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 08:27 -0700, Gary Thomas wrote: On 2012-03-01 08:11, Gary Thomas wrote: On 2012-03-01 07:59, Richard Purdie wrote: On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 07:43 -0700, Gary Thomas wrote: Recent changes have attempted to make consistant use of

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] initscripts: Properly handle new timestamp format

2012-03-01 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 12:27, Gary Thomas g...@mlbassoc.com wrote: I think the best thing would be to turn CONFIG_FEATURE_DATE_COMPAT back on along with my reformatting change. I can make an updated patch if you agree. This is indeed the better solution. Please send an updated patch in

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] initscripts: Properly handle new timestamp format

2012-03-01 Thread Gary Thomas
On 2012-03-01 09:04, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 12:52, Gary Thomasg...@mlbassoc.com wrote: On 2012-03-01 08:44, Richard Purdie wrote: Is this going to cause us a problem in real world usage? I'd hope in the general case we use standard formatting? I have to admit I'm

[OE-core] [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix /etc/timestamp handling

2012-03-01 Thread Gary Thomas
Recent changes have attempted to make consistant use of /etc/timestamp In particular 5aab665 initscripts: Make /etc/timestamp consistent again. 173a48f image.bbclass: Ensure timestamp matches format used in initscripts after recent changes e32e236 busybox: Enable 64 bit shell tests, and

[OE-core] [PATCH v2 1/2] initscripts: Properly format date when set from timestamp

2012-03-01 Thread Gary Thomas
Reformat date, as stored in /etc/timestamp, to match CLI format. Signed-off-by: Gary Thomas g...@mlbassoc.com Signed-off-by: Gary Thomas g...@mlbassoc.com --- .../initscripts/initscripts-1.0/bootmisc.sh|2 +- meta/recipes-core/initscripts/initscripts_1.0.bb |2 +- 2 files

[OE-core] [PATCH v2 2/2] busybox: Restore 'date' compatability

2012-03-01 Thread Gary Thomas
Restore CONFIG_FEATURE_DATE_COMPAT so that all versions of 'date', whether from busybox or coreutils, agree on the format when setting the date from the command line. Signed-off-by: Gary Thomas g...@mlbassoc.com --- meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox-1.19.3/defconfig |2 +-

Re: [OE-core] [oe-core][PATCHv2 2/5] bitbake.conf: remove TARGET_ARCH from in SDKPATH

2012-03-01 Thread Martin Jansa
in oecore-i686-arm-toolchain-gmae-20120229.tar.bz2 and for armv4t with similar name (I was lucky that it took more then day to build) oecore-i686-arm-toolchain-gmae-20120301.tar.bz2 Cheers, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [OE-core] [oe-core][PATCHv2 2/5] bitbake.conf: remove TARGET_ARCH from in SDKPATH

2012-03-01 Thread Richard Purdie
to PACKAGE_ARCH or TUNE_PKGARCH because meta-toolchain-gmae for armv7a ends in oecore-i686-arm-toolchain-gmae-20120229.tar.bz2 and for armv4t with similar name (I was lucky that it took more then day to build) oecore-i686-arm-toolchain-gmae-20120301.tar.bz2 Agreed... Cheers, Richard

[OE-core] [PATCH] image_types: add IMAGE_ROOTFS_ALIGNMENT

2012-03-01 Thread Ken Werner
Introduce a new variable called IMAGE_ROOTFS_ALIGNMENT that allows to control the aligment of the size of the rootfs. Its default value is set to 1KiB so that the existing behaviour is not changed. In case the SD card emulation of a QEMU system emulator gets used you may set the alignment to 2MiB.

[OE-core] [PATCH] scripts/oe-git-proxy-socks-command: Improve error fallback/handling

2012-03-01 Thread Richard Purdie
If oe-git-proxy-socks isn't available, try and create it. If that fails, tell the user there is a problem, don't just fail to find the command. [YOCTO #2007] Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org --- diff --git a/scripts/oe-git-proxy-socks-command

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix /etc/timestamp handling

2012-03-01 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 10:41 -0700, Gary Thomas wrote: Recent changes have attempted to make consistant use of /etc/timestamp In particular 5aab665 initscripts: Make /etc/timestamp consistent again. 173a48f image.bbclass: Ensure timestamp matches format used in initscripts after recent

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libproxy: Fix build errors due to missing prototypes

2012-03-01 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 10:08 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: g++ really does not like the missing prototypes here we were missing close() and read() so include unistd.h to get them Signed-off-by: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com --- .../libproxy/libproxy/g++-namepace.patch | 22

[OE-core] [PATCH] scripts/oe-git-proxy-socks-command: Add fallback to use nc

2012-03-01 Thread Richard Purdie
If our own proxy command isn't available for some reason and nc is available, fall back to use it. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org --- diff --git a/scripts/oe-git-proxy-socks-command b/scripts/oe-git-proxy-socks-command index 39e0acb..8acffb5 100755 ---

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] image_types: add IMAGE_ROOTFS_ALIGNMENT

2012-03-01 Thread Saul Wold
On 03/01/2012 12:55 PM, Ken Werner wrote: Introduce a new variable called IMAGE_ROOTFS_ALIGNMENT that allows to control the aligment of the size of the rootfs. Its default value is set to 1KiB so that the existing behaviour is not changed. In case the SD card emulation of a QEMU system emulator

[OE-core] Image generation change

2012-03-01 Thread Gary Thomas
I'm having a problem after the recent change commit eacedb4f2afa98dbd2f5ea7a9f52e6ea952a72d2 Author: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org Date: Wed Feb 29 16:24:26 2012 + image_types: Correctness fixes * Add a newline to improve the output formatting * Use

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: Pick up ${NM} from the environment.

2012-03-01 Thread James Limbouris
-Original Message- From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of Khem Raj Sent: Thursday, 1 March 2012 6:06 PM To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: Pick

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: Pick up ${NM} from the environment.

2012-03-01 Thread Khem Raj
On (02/03/12 03:07), James Limbouris wrote: -Original Message- From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of Khem Raj Sent: Thursday, 1 March 2012 6:06 PM To:

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: Pick up ${NM} from the environment.

2012-03-01 Thread James Limbouris
-Original Message- From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of Khem Raj Sent: Friday, 2 March 2012 1:24 PM To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf:

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] initscripts: Properly handle new timestamp format

2012-03-01 Thread Lauri Hintsala
On 03/01/2012 06:06 PM, Gary Thomas wrote: As far as I can recall (which is a really long time), 'date' has always wanted the format MMDDHHmm[], so I think that's what we should expect. That format doesn't compare easily which is why the timestamp was changed (not by me) to a more ISO

[OE-core] multilib build failure with shadow-sysroot:do_populate_sysroot_setscene

2012-03-01 Thread Zhai, Edwin
RP, I have image-sato multilib build failure with following error: ERROR: Task do_package_setscene depends upon nonexistant task /distro/edwin-working/poky/meta/recipes-extended/shadow/shadow-sysroot_4.1.4.3.bb:do_populate_sysroot_setscene Summary: There was 1 ERROR message shown, returning a

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] Fix libpam's chmod

2012-03-01 Thread Robert Yang
The libpam's has an error when generating the rootfs: chmod: cannot access `/usr/sbin/unix_chkpwd': No such file or directory This is because the following code in libpam_1.1.5.bb: pkg_postinst_pam-plugin-unix () { # below is necessary to allow unix_chkpwd get user info from shadow file

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: Pick up ${NM} from the environment.

2012-03-01 Thread Khem Raj
It is more than set in the environment - the configure script spits out two messages about it before hitting this macro. So, I think the check is entirely extraneous. if you can point that there is another check which makes this one redundant thats a different issue and then your patch is