Re: [OE-core] [poky][zeus][PATCH] bzip2: Fix CVE-2019-12900

2020-01-15 Thread Saloni Jain
Hello Khem Raj, We have tested the applicability for this patch on master as well and as per analysis it is applicable. I've sent the same patch for master branch as well in a separate mail. Thanks & Regards, Saloni From: Khem Raj Sent: Wednesday, January 15,

[OE-core] [PATCH] webkitgtk: Disable gold for all mips

2020-01-15 Thread Khem Raj
If gnu hash is enabled for mips then we can not use gold linker since gnu hash handling is only supported with good old BFD linker alone Fixes .gnu.hash is incompatible with the MIPS ABI See gold/mips.cc in binutils for reference Signed-off-by: Khem Raj ---

[OE-core] [PATCH] gettext: Fix overloadable error with clang

2020-01-15 Thread Khem Raj
Clang detects that getcwd is being re-declared and signatures don't match, simple solution is to let clang use overloadable attribute Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- .../gettext/gettext-0.20.1/overloadable.patch | 22 +++ meta/recipes-core/gettext/gettext_0.20.1.bb | 1 + 2 files

Re: [OE-core] Question about the behavior and intent of recrdeptask

2020-01-15 Thread Masahiro Yamada
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 5:45 PM Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 12:14 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > So, the concept of "recursive dependency" sounds > > somewhat odd to me. > > > > I guess I am missing important use-cases. > > I'd like to know the reason why we need

Re: [OE-core] Looking for a way to build latest tagged releases in recipes

2020-01-15 Thread chris.laplante--- via Openembedded-core
> I've gone back and forth and re-implemented the code to do so a half dozen > times. Chronologically, these are the fundamental > strategies I've attempted: > > 1. Simply in terms of buildhistory-collect-srcrevs. > Pros: dead simple > Cons: requires that you actually build stuff

[OE-core] [PATCH] vim: update from 8.1.1518 to 8.2

2020-01-15 Thread Oleg Polyakov
vim-tiny: update from 8.1.1518 to 8.2 The date in the license was updated to 2020 and a trailing space was removed from one line. Signed-off-by: Oleg Polyakov --- .../vim/{vim-tiny_8.1.1518.bb => vim-tiny_8.2.bb} | 0 meta/recipes-support/vim/vim.inc | 4

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/3] Make kernel-yocto bbclass usable without linux-yocto.inc

2020-01-15 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 1:36 PM Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > I already have an entire queue in development for this. > > So hold onto this series. I'll publish my branch later this week, or early > next. Actually, I'll see how it stacks on top of my changes and send a unified branch to try out.

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/3] Make kernel-yocto bbclass usable without linux-yocto.inc

2020-01-15 Thread Bruce Ashfield
I already have an entire queue in development for this. So hold onto this series. I'll publish my branch later this week, or early next. Bruce On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 1:08 PM Paul Barker wrote: > > Patch 1 allows the kernel-yocto bbclass to be inherited directly in a recipe > without needing

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 05/28] python3: update to 3.8.1

2020-01-15 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 19:37, Richard Purdie < richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > The autobuilder failed with this again, I went in and the first bit of > debugging I added was to say which file its failing on. Answer was: > > WARNING: python3-3.8.1-r0 do_package: >

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] kernel-yocto: Move defaults and tasks from linux-yocto.inc into bbclass

2020-01-15 Thread Paul Barker
This allows the kernel-yocto bbclass to be inherited in a recipe without needing to include linux-yocto.inc. The bbclass should stand on its own and linux-yocto.inc does a few things which may not be desired in other kernel recipes (such as modifying KERNEL_FEATURES). The LINUX_VERSION_EXTENSION

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] kernel-yocto: Drop setting of unused variables in do_kernel_metadata

2020-01-15 Thread Paul Barker
The machine_branch and machine_srcrev variables were set but not used in do_kernel_metadata. Signed-off-by: Paul Barker --- meta/classes/kernel-yocto.bbclass | 7 --- 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel-yocto.bbclass b/meta/classes/kernel-yocto.bbclass index

[OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] kernel-yocto: Only override CONFIG_LOCALVERSION if LINUX_VERSION_EXTENSION is set

2020-01-15 Thread Paul Barker
CONFIG_LOCALVERSION may already be set in a defconfig or config fragment and this should not be unconditionally overridden. Signed-off-by: Paul Barker --- meta/classes/kernel-yocto.bbclass | 6 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/3] Make kernel-yocto bbclass usable without linux-yocto.inc

2020-01-15 Thread Paul Barker
Patch 1 allows the kernel-yocto bbclass to be inherited directly in a recipe without needing to use linux-yocto.inc. I can then use kconfig fragments in my kernel recipe without pulling in the whole of linux-yocto.inc (which includes some things I don't want like KERNEL_FEATURES changes and the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] vim: update from 8.1.1518 to 8.2.0

2020-01-15 Thread Alexander Kanavin
Thanks, we are almost there :) Please set the version in the filename to 8.2 (not 8.2.0) so that 'devtool latest-version vim' prints a matching result, and 'devtool check-upgrade-status vim' prints nothing. Alex On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 at 18:59, Oleg Polyakov wrote: > vim-tiny: update from

[OE-core] [PATCH] vim: update from 8.1.1518 to 8.2.0

2020-01-15 Thread Oleg Polyakov
vim-tiny: update from 8.1.1518 to 8.2.0 The date in the license was updated to 2020 and a trailing space was removed from one line. Signed-off-by: Oleg Polyakov --- .../vim/{vim-tiny_8.1.1518.bb => vim-tiny_8.2.0.bb} | 0 meta/recipes-support/vim/vim.inc |

[OE-core] [PATCH] newlib: Upgrade newlib and libgloss to the yearly release 3.2.0

2020-01-15 Thread Alejandro Enedino Hernandez Samaniego
A new yearly snapshot was taken on January 2nd of 2020, this bumps newlib to 3.2.0. - Mentor Graphics added tcl license (amdgcn-* targets) - BSD-Clause-2 was added as well by Dinux (pru-* targets) Signed-off-by: Alejandro Enedino Hernandez Samaniego --- .../newlib/{libgloss_3.1.0.bb =>

Re: [OE-core] [poky][zeus][PATCH] bzip2: Fix CVE-2019-12900

2020-01-15 Thread Khem Raj
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 7:51 AM Saloni Jain wrote: > > From: Sana Kazi > > Added patch for CVE-2019-12900 as backport from upstream. > Fixes out of bound access discovered while fuzzying karchive. > is this fix already present in the bzip2 version we have in master ? > Tested by:

Re: [OE-core] [poky][master][PATCH] bzip2: Fix CVE-2019-12900

2020-01-15 Thread Ross Burton
On 15/01/2020 15:47, Saloni Jain wrote: From: Sana Kazi Added patch for CVE-2019-12900 as backport from upstream. Fixes out of bound access discovered while fuzzying karchive. Tested by: sana.k...@kpit.com Signed-off-by: Saloni Jain Need a S-o-b in the patch itself alongside a CVE tag,

[OE-core] [PATCH] libubootenv: fix multilib build

2020-01-15 Thread Stefano Babic
In case of multilib, the do_package fails with: ERROR: libubootenv-0.2-r0 do_package: QA Issue: libubootenv: Files/directories were installed but not shipped in any package: /usr/lib/libubootenv.so /usr/lib/libubootenv.so.0.2 Issue is fixed in libubootenv repo - this patch updates SRCREV to

[OE-core] ✗ patchtest: failure for bzip2: Fix CVE-2019-12900 (rev6)

2020-01-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: bzip2: Fix CVE-2019-12900 (rev6) Revision: 6 URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/18434/ State : failure == Summary == Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is an automated response. Several tests have been executed on

[OE-core] ✗ patchtest: failure for bzip2: Fix CVE-2019-12900 (rev5)

2020-01-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: bzip2: Fix CVE-2019-12900 (rev5) Revision: 5 URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/18434/ State : failure == Summary == Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is an automated response. Several tests have been executed on

[OE-core] ✗ patchtest: failure for bzip2: Fix CVE-2019-12900 (rev4)

2020-01-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: bzip2: Fix CVE-2019-12900 (rev4) Revision: 4 URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/18434/ State : failure == Summary == Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is an automated response. Several tests have been executed on

[OE-core] [poky][zeus][PATCH] bzip2: Fix CVE-2019-12900

2020-01-15 Thread Saloni Jain
From: Sana Kazi Added patch for CVE-2019-12900 as backport from upstream. Fixes out of bound access discovered while fuzzying karchive. Tested by: sana.k...@kpit.com Signed-off-by: Saloni Jain --- .../bzip2/bzip2-1.0.6/CVE-2019-12900.patch | 34 ++ 1 file changed,

[OE-core] [poky][sumo][PATCH] bzip2: Fix CVE-2019-12900

2020-01-15 Thread Saloni Jain
From: Sana Kazi Added patch for CVE-2019-12900 as backport from upstream. Fixes out of bound access discovered while fuzzying karchive. Tested by: sana.k...@kpit.com Signed-off-by: Saloni Jain --- .../bzip2/bzip2-1.0.6/CVE-2019-12900.patch | 34 ++

[OE-core] [poky][master][PATCH] bzip2: Fix CVE-2019-12900

2020-01-15 Thread Saloni Jain
From: Sana Kazi Added patch for CVE-2019-12900 as backport from upstream. Fixes out of bound access discovered while fuzzying karchive. Tested by: sana.k...@kpit.com Signed-off-by: Saloni Jain --- .../bzip2/bzip2-1.0.6/CVE-2019-12900.patch | 34 ++ 1 file changed,

[OE-core] [PATCH] xf86-video-intel: bump to latest SRCREV

2020-01-15 Thread Ross Burton
Drop the i686 build fix, this is integrated upstream now. Signed-off-by: Ross Burton --- .../01_Fix-build-on-i686.patch| 55 --- .../xorg-driver/xf86-video-intel_git.bb | 7 +-- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-) delete mode 100644

Re: [OE-core] Best practices: Multiple images on one partition.

2020-01-15 Thread Paul Barker
On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 at 13:05, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: > > Hello > > I am trying to figure out the best way to achieve this. I have a > system with a host and a target. The target netboots form the host and > have a different package architecture. > > Usually I was solving this with one

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 04/20] python3: update to 3.8.1

2020-01-15 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2020-01-14 at 14:59 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > Drop backports, rebase other patches. > > 0001-main.c-if-OEPYTHON3HOME-is-set-use-instead-of-PYTHON.patch > is removed as the use case (allowing python 2 and 3 to coexist > in SDKs) is no longer relevant with Python 2.x reaching end of

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] meta: gdk-pixbuf: add man packageconfig

2020-01-15 Thread Ross Burton
On 15/01/2020 01:25, Maxime Roussin-Bélanger wrote: I have modified the recipe to use manpages, but it is impossible to run a build from master, because of my python3 pyenv setup. I had to add +DEPENDS = "python3-native" to ca-certificates, without it was impossible to go through the

[OE-core] Best practices: Multiple images on one partition.

2020-01-15 Thread Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
Hello I am trying to figure out the best way to achieve this. I have a system with a host and a target. The target netboots form the host and have a different package architecture. Usually I was solving this with one partition per image/machine, combined using a .wks file like: part /export

Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv5 3/8] kernel-artifact-names.bbclass: use PR instead of PKGR in KERNEL_ARTIFACT_NAME

2020-01-15 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2020-01-14 at 10:12 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > * otherwise PKGR seen in do_install, do_deploy and do_deploy_links > will > have different value in each of them (PRSERV will return different > value of EXTENDPRAUTO because TASKHASH is different for each of > these > tasks and also

Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv5 0/6] YOCTO #12937 - Consistent naming scheme for deployed artifacts

2020-01-15 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2020-01-14 at 10:12 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > The following changes since commit > b6d4150f9c74f25a4022a3fa0bd489a8e85deb77: > > gettext: fix typo in Upstream-Status (2020-01-13 13:07:32 +) > > are available in the Git repository at: > >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] meta: gdk-pixbuf: add man packageconfig

2020-01-15 Thread Alexander Kanavin
I don't know: I am not seeing the issue locally, and it doesn't happen on the autobuilder, so it's difficult to give a useful answer. Alex On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 at 02:26, Maxime Roussin-Bélanger < maxime.roussinbelan...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have modified the recipe to use manpages, but it is

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] vim: update from 8.1.1518 to 8.2.0110

2020-01-15 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 23:37, Randy MacLeod wrote: > That's also what 'devtool latest-version vim' should currently report and > 'devtool upgrade' upgrade to: I purposely cut off the point releases and > left only the major.minor part there. > > Right. This will also give Oleg an excuse to try