7, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli
giuseppe.condore...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Steve,
thanks for the reply.
The problem is that I need to force a patch application (like patch --force
option) at my own risk.
Do you see any solution?
Giuseppe
2014-08-07 16:43 GMT+02:00 Stephen
Hi All,
please can I know if is it possible, using the do_patch routine,
to force the application of a given patch?
I mean, like the patch --force command.
Please let me know, I tried w/o good result.
Best Regards,
Giuseppe
--
___
Openembedded-core
you want to
do). I guess I would ask why? and if it were me I'd just reroll the
patch and fix it. But I don't know what the real problem is, so...
Steve
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli
giuseppe.condore...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
please can I know
for the support,
Cheers.
Giuseppe
2013/7/24 Stanacar, StefanX stefanx.stana...@intel.com
On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 11:43 +0200, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
Hi Paul,
I saw it early this morning (reading the previous thread)
but I've not put it in the right attention I think.
Now I've installed
Hi All,
given that the make v. 3.82 is broken, as the sanity check highlights,
which is the best solution
to allow Fedora users (as I am) to go ahead with the build?
I don't like to avoid sanity checks or to use an older version of
sanity.bbclass.
Please let me know, currently this issue is
, 2013-07-24 at 09:33 +0200, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
Hi All,
given that the make v. 3.82 is broken, as the sanity check highlights,
which is the best solution
to allow Fedora users (as I am) to go ahead with the build?
I don't like to avoid sanity checks or to use an older version
?
Many thanks,
Cheers.
Giuseppe
2013/7/24 Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk
On 24 July 2013 09:47, Giuseppe Condorelli
giuseppe.condore...@gmail.com wrote:
Many thanks for the quick reply Stefan,
For completion, I'm working on FC16.
Indeed (before sending the mail) I tried downloading
Hi All,
I'm working with the best so far master openembedded-core repository plus
the bitbake version 1.19.1
Using the external toolchain csl I'm in trouble because it seems the latest
modification in the csl-versions.inc
breaks the csl_get_version routine. I mean, it is not able to find the gcc
/bitbake/commit/?id=6acd444a557bba977ae1772371fdadf5f510e3b6,
which indicates the new 1.19.1 version.
Thanks,
Giuseppe
2013/6/25 Giuseppe Condorelli giuseppe.condore...@gmail.com
Hi All,
I'm working with the best so far master openembedded-core repository plus
the bitbake version 1.19.1
Using
tried to install iproute2, previously packaged
as rpm.
Best Regards,
Giuseppe
From: Giuseppe Condorelli [mailto:giuseppe.condore...@gmail.com]
Sent: mercoledì 27 marzo 2013 10:14
To: Giuseppe CONDORELLI
Subject: Fwd: [OE-core] [PATCH] iproute2: add bash runtime dependence
[mailto:cristian.io...@intel.com]
Sent: mercoledì 27 marzo 2013 15:25
To: Giuseppe CONDORELLI; openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org;
p...@pbcl.net; raj.k...@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [OE-core] [PATCH] iproute2: add bash runtime dependence
Hello,
Are the three bash scripts related to iproute base
Add bash runtime dependence, required at package install time.
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Condorelli giuseppe.condore...@st.com
---
meta/recipes-connectivity/iproute2/iproute2.inc|1 +
.../iproute2/iproute2_3.8.0.bb |2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1
.
Cheers,
Giuseppe
Sau!
On 02/14/2013 08:44 AM, Giuseppe CONDORELLI wrote:
Hi,
due to local company restrictions, I cannot clone external git repository.
During prelink-native fetch I catch the warning about that (given that the
SRC_URI point to git) but then,
trying other mirrors, system
Hi,
due to local company restrictions, I cannot clone external git repository.
During prelink-native fetch I catch the warning about that (given that the
SRC_URI point to git) but then,
trying other mirrors, system is able to download a tar.gz of the prelink.
The strange thing is that however
Hi All,
Today I pulled changes in local from OE-Core master repository.
Running a build I'm failing because bitbake 1.71.1 is requested and I've the
1.17.0 instead.
The tar file is not yet available looking at the openemebedded site.
Do I have to clone also bitbake to have the bsf sources?
However, what about the resultant libraries as well as libsotruss?
Do we have to also to remove them from file inclusion to avoid warnings?
Cheers,
Giuseppe
-Original Message-
From: Giuseppe Condorelli [mailto:giuseppe.condore...@st.com]
Sent: venerdì 25 gennaio 2013 15:32
To: 'Marcin
Well done Marcin,
I've just met this issue working with my local external-toolchain and I had
to
locally patch the same .inc for checking. :)
Thanks for having highlighted that in the mailing list.
Regards,
Giuseppe
-Original Message-
From:
To: Giuseppe CONDORELLI
Cc: 'Giuseppe Condorelli'; openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] eglibc: fix as and ld check in libc dir
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 05:59:00PM +0100, Giuseppe CONDORELLI wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Martin Jansa [mailto:martin.ja
From: Martin Jansa [mailto:martin.ja...@gmail.com]
Sent: venerdì 18 gennaio 2013 09:55
To: Giuseppe CONDORELLI
Cc: Giuseppe Condorelli; Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] eglibc: fix as and ld check in libc dir
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:32
Hi Martin,
Do you mean applying the patch you highlighted in libc/configure?
Cheers,
Giuseppe
-Original Message-
From: Martin Jansa [mailto:martin.ja...@gmail.com]
Sent: giovedì 17 gennaio 2013 13:42
To: Giuseppe Condorelli
Cc: Giuseppe CONDORELLI; openembedded-core
Fix routine to check as and ld version check in the configure, to allow system
to correctly check for version 2.1x.
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Condorelli giuseppe.condore...@st.com
---
.../eglibc-2.16_fix_as_ld_ver_check.patch | 23
meta/recipes-core/eglibc
2013/1/16 Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 03:14:07PM +0100, Giuseppe CONDORELLI wrote:
Fix routine to check as and ld version check in the configure, to allow
system
to correctly check for version 2.1x.
Does it build with gold now?
http://lists.linuxtogo.org
Fix routine to check as and ld version check in the configure, to allow system
to correctly check for version 2.1x.
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Condorelli giuseppe.condore...@st.com
---
.../eglibc-2.16_fix_as_ld_ver_check.patch | 23
meta/recipes-core/eglibc
toolchain (containing the cross-compiler),
able to be installed and used by third part to build
their own target applications.
For sure conceptually I'm missing something.
Best Regards,
Giuseppe
2013/1/8 Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 16:12 +0100, Giuseppe
Set LINK_SIZE in BUILD_CFLAGS given that the autotools bbclass use it to set
CFLAG_FOR_BUILD, required for the libpcre build.
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Condorelli giuseppe.condore...@st.com
---
meta/recipes-support/libpcre/libpcre_8.32.bb |5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions
Set LINK_SIZE in BUILD_CFLAGS given that the autotools bbclass use it to set
CFLAGS_FOR_BUILD, required for the libpcre build.
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Condorelli giuseppe.condore...@st.com
---
meta/recipes-support/libpcre/libpcre_8.32.bb |5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2
in the SRC_URI list.
Cheers,
Giuseppe
2012/12/19 Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com
On Monday 17 December 2012 14:51:59 Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
2012/12/14 Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca
On Fri, 14 Dec 2012, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
2012/12/14 Robert P. J. Day rpj
extrapaths.
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Condorelli giuseppe.condore...@st.com
---
meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.7.inc |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.7.inc
b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.7.inc
index 2cfbf99..378caf0 100644
2012/12/14 Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca
On Fri, 14 Dec 2012, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
2012/12/14 Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca
On Fri, 14 Dec 2012, Marko Katić wrote:
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 17:41 +0100, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
Hi All
2012/12/14 Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca
On Fri, 14 Dec 2012, Marko Katić wrote:
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 17:41 +0100, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
Hi All,
I've seen that, in the given .inc file, the FILESPATH is statically
set to
FILESPATH = ${FILE_DIRNAME}/gcc-4.7
,
Giuseppe
2012/11/7 Giuseppe Condorelli giuseppe.condore...@gmail.com
Hi All,
building for mips32, uclibc build failed with
libc/sysdeps/linux/common/getppid.c:14:1: error: expected expression
before '=' token
Has someone met the same issue?
Please let me know.
Cheers,
Giuseppe
Hi All,
building for mips32, uclibc build failed with
libc/sysdeps/linux/common/getppid.c:14:1: error: expected expression before
'=' token
Has someone met the same issue?
Please let me know.
Cheers,
Giuseppe
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
a build system also
running uclibc
On Friday, October 26, 2012, Giuseppe Condorelli
giuseppe.condore...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I need to build sdk using uclibc.
I'm failing on nativesdk-libc-for-gcc dependence because
system always finds nativesdk-eglibc as the correct one.
I've set
Hi All,
I need to build sdk using uclibc.
I'm failing on nativesdk-libc-for-gcc dependence because
system always finds nativesdk-eglibc as the correct one.
I've set TCLIBC to uclibc and in fact (builind with -DDD) I can
say the default nativesdk is the uclibc, although the eglibc part
will be
Fixed error in do_install_basefilesissue, printf is now replaced by echo.
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Condorelli giuseppe.condore...@st.com
---
meta/recipes-core/base-files/base-files_3.0.14.bb |8
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/base
behavior of two new lines while using 'echo \n', 'printf \n\n' is
used.
[YOCTO #3138]
with very weak explanation why..
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Condorelli giuseppe.condore...@st.com
---
meta/recipes-core/base-files/base-files_3.0.14.bb |8
1 files changed, 4
-23 at 08:45 +0200, Giuseppe CONDORELLI wrote:
Fixed error in do_install_basefilesissue, printf is now replaced by echo.
What kind of error?
Doesn't this change have issues about how newlines are handled?
Cheers,
Richard
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Condorelli giuseppe.condore...@st.com
][PATCH] base-files:
do_install_basefilesissue error
To: Giuseppe CONDORELLI mailto:giuseppe.condore...@st.com
giuseppe.condore...@st.com
Cc: mailto:openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Giuseppe CONDORELLI
Well, many thanks Phil for your fast reply.
Cheers,
Giuseppe
2012/10/23 Phil Blundell ph...@gnu.org
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 17:22 +0200, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
I need to enable init applet in the current version of busybox.
Do I have to create my own defconfig to pass via .bbappend file
Fixed error in do_install_basefilesissue, printf is now replaced by echo.
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Condorelli giuseppe.condore...@st.com
---
meta/recipes-core/base-files/base-files_3.0.14.bb |8
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/base
This is a forward of the mail erroneously sent only to Khem.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Giuseppe Condorelli giuseppe.condore...@gmail.com
Date: 2012/9/7
Subject: Re: [OE-core] Cannot find -lssp during uclibc package build
To: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
Hi Khem,
many thanks
Hi Khem, All
I'm building an uclibc image using gcc 4.6.3 instead of the 4.7 version
oe-core provides.
I'm falling in the following linker error during uClibc package build:
Cannot find -lssp
Now, ssp support is enabled in the uClibc package and disabled in the
gcc-cross-initial package, so
ld
Many thanks Paul for the clarification.
Cheers,
Giuseppe
2012/8/27 Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com
On Monday 27 August 2012 10:05:15 Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
Is there a way to append (in private layer) the .inc files other than the
.bb (bbappend)?
You can't - you can only
2012/8/21 Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com
On Tuesday 21 August 2012 15:52:17 Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
[]$ bitbake core-image-minimal
Pseudo is not present but is required, building this first before the
main
build
NOTE: Error expanding variable
2012/8/21 Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com
On Tuesday 21 August 2012 15:15:42 Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
Hi,
Hi Paul,
many thanks for your quick reply.
today I restarted to work on my own OE meta layer and, after having
pulled
last two months changes is OE-Core, I
Hi All,
although the recipe of the package in subject selects npth for uclibc
systems, the configure script searchs always for
pth. I've created a personal patch to avoid this and to move to npth but
now I can see there are many sources that include pth.h
How can I build gnupg using npth?
,
Giuseppe
2012/6/12 Mark Hatle mark.ha...@windriver.com
On 6/12/12 8:57 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli
giuseppe.condore...@gmail.com** wrote:
OSError: [Errno 1] Operation not permitted:
'/oelinux/condorg/**openembedded-core/stlinux-3.0-**
build/tmp
Hi Mark,
many thanks for the explanation.
Cheers,
Giuseppe
2012/6/12 Mark Hatle mark.ha...@windriver.com
On 6/12/12 2:21 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
Hi Mark,
this can be interesting for me. Please can you explain with an example
what
really this patch does?
The resolver database
Sorry guys, I forgot to reply that I'm using the bitbake 1.15.2.
Have I to update it? Since now I was based on the best so far archive file
for bitbake.
2012/6/12 Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli
giuseppe.condore...@gmail.com wrote:
OSError
/13 Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:02 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli
giuseppe.condore...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Khem, Mark,
I've not changed the location of the local repository since it was
created
months ago.
This problem appeared yesterday and I cannot find a why.
can
Hi Mark,
this can be interesting for me. Please can you explain with an example what
really this patch does?
Many thanks,
Giuseppe
2012/6/11 Mark Hatle mark.ha...@windriver.com
Add functionality to RPM to directly query the packageorigin (path) from
the resolver database, instead of having to
Hi All,
I'm wondering about sdk packaging and installation process.
My question is: is the sdk image installed as for core images?
I mean, core images are installed (as rpm, ipk) and then a tar file is also
provided.
Is sdk process the same?
Please let me know, I'm asking this before
know.
Best Regards,
Giuseppe
2012/6/1 Giuseppe Condorelli giuseppe.condore...@gmail.com
Hi Khem,
2012/6/1 Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli
giuseppe.condore...@gmail.com wrote:
Many thanks Khem,
I've applied your patches to my local repository
...@gmail.com
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 1:33 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli
giuseppe.condore...@gmail.com wrote:
Solved,
I missed to set TARGET_OS = eglibc leaving it to uclibc, my previous
build...
thats wrong. If you are using OE-Core then the variable to set it TCLIBC
and TARGET_OS is usually
Solved,
I missed to set TARGET_OS = eglibc leaving it to uclibc, my previous
build...
Cheers,
Giuseppe
2012/6/4 Giuseppe Condorelli giuseppe.condore...@gmail.com
Hi All,
I'm falling in a circular dependency error between libiconv and gettext
during eglibc build.
libiconv (as set in tclibc
/6/1 Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli
giuseppe.condore...@gmail.com wrote:
Have new suggestions?
I found a bit of time and fixed rpm compilation on uclibc. Its only
compiling though I don't know if it will run on target. Try it out.
The patch
Hi Khem,
2012/6/1 Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli
giuseppe.condore...@gmail.com wrote:
Many thanks Khem,
I've applied your patches to my local repository.
Unfortunately the uclibc setup I'm using doesn't provide support for
mcheck,
so
Hi Khem,
2012/5/30 Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli
giuseppe.condore...@gmail.com wrote:
It fails on undefined reference to xmalloc, xcalloc, etc... that however
are
internally defined and used as wrapper for real malloc, etc...
Please
2012/5/31 Giuseppe Condorelli giuseppe.condore...@gmail.com
Hi Khem,
2012/5/30 Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli
giuseppe.condore...@gmail.com wrote:
It fails on undefined reference to xmalloc, xcalloc, etc... that
however are
internally
Thanks for the reply,
unfortunately I depend from rpm, I need just rpm packages.
So can you confirm the target rpm for uclibc is not building?
Thanks again,
Giuseppe
2012/5/31 Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli
giuseppe.condore...@gmail.com wrote
, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
Thanks for the reply,
unfortunately I depend from rpm, I need just rpm packages.
Why do you need RPM?
So can you confirm the target rpm for uclibc is not building?
Thanks again,
Giuseppe
2012/5/31 Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com mailto:raj.k...@gmail.com
via oe
system.
How can it help me if I query installed packages from host?
Cheers,
Giuseppe
2012/5/29 Giuseppe Condorelli giuseppe.condore...@gmail.com
2012/5/29 Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com
On Tuesday 29 May 2012 15:20:14 Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
What I'm not understanding
Hi All,
I'm falling in error building rpm-5.4.0 for target.
It fails on undefined reference to xmalloc, xcalloc, etc... that however
are internally defined and used as wrapper for real malloc, etc...
Please, can somebody try to build this package for me?
NOTE: the rpm build inclusion is dued by
2012/5/28 Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com
On Monday 28 May 2012 17:30:34 Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
Well, I added ROOTFS_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND += list_installed_packages ;
in
the image recipe I want to build.
Build went right but I don't know where to find the output
Hi All,
building the default core-image-minimal image I obtain no error and all
seems to end right.
But if I look at the generated .../tmp/log.do_rootfs file I can see an
error that souds strange to me.
---
Building feeds for
[stlinux]..
./
./lib/
./lib/librt-0.9.32.so
2012/5/29 Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com
On Tuesday 29 May 2012 15:20:14 Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
What I'm not understanding is how I can invoke my shell function. Do you
mean I have to invoke it as append function of populate_rootfs one?
If you aren't including packaging
Hi All,
I need to query, via rpm command, the packages installed building an own
image recipe.
I know the populate_rootfs step for images uses rpm to install the packages
(if we set PACKAGE_CLASSES).
To do this it sets a dbpath and a root path for installing the packages.
I need to know how to
Hi Paul,
first of all many thanks for your quick reply. :)
2012/5/28 Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com
On Monday 28 May 2012 15:14:32 Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
I need to query, via rpm command, the packages installed building an own
image recipe.
I know the populate_rootfs
Hi All,
can I have an help about rpms installation, once they were built by oc-core?
I produced both .tgz and rpms, I'm wondering how to install them (maybe
using chroot, but I'm newbe
about it).
Please, have you suggestions?
Thanks,
Giuseppe
___
...@gmail.com
On Wednesday, May 16, 2012, Giuseppe Condorelli
giuseppe.condore...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I'm catching an error during my personal core-image build at do_package
stage of libgcc.
The libgcc version (4.6.3) I'm using comes from an own layer as well as
the compiler
Hi All,
I'm catching an error during my personal core-image build at do_package
stage of libgcc.
The libgcc version (4.6.3) I'm using comes from an own layer as well as the
compiler.
In past days I was able to successfully complete the personal core-image
build working against stable oe-core tar
71 matches
Mail list logo
