Commit 992cec44 (coreutils: Move stdbuf into an own package
coreutils-stdbuf) breaks package-qa when the single-binary
PACKAGECONFIG is used:
ERROR: coreutils-8.32-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: /usr/bin/stdbuf contained in
package coreutils-stdbuf requires /usr/bin/coreutils, but no providers found
On 04/07/2020 23.10, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 11:48:36AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> ...
>> I hadn't realised there was already the reverse dependency. I think we
>> need to let the package exist in both cases so the two dependencies
>> need to reverse direction depending on
On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 11:48:36AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
>...
> I hadn't realised there was already the reverse dependency. I think we
> need to let the package exist in both cases so the two dependencies
> need to reverse direction depending on whether single-binary is set.
>...
What about
On 03/07/2020 12.48, Richard Purdie wrote:
>>> Whilst I realise there is a problem here is the correct fix not:
>>>
>>> RDEPENDS_coreutils-stdbuf_class-target +=
>>> "${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG', 'single-binary', '', 'coreutils',
>>> d)}"
>>>
>>> ?
>>
>> [Well, the coreutils should be i
On Fri, 2020-07-03 at 11:29 +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 03/07/2020 11.19, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Fri, 2020-07-03 at 09:36 +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > > Commit 992cec44 (coreutils: Move stdbuf into an own package
> > > coreutils-stdbuf) breaks package-qa when the single-binary
>
On 03/07/2020 11.19, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-07-03 at 09:36 +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>> Commit 992cec44 (coreutils: Move stdbuf into an own package
>> coreutils-stdbuf) breaks package-qa when the single-binary
>> PACKAGECONFIG is used:
>>
>> ERROR: coreutils-8.31-r0 do_package_qa
On Fri, 2020-07-03 at 09:36 +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> Commit 992cec44 (coreutils: Move stdbuf into an own package
> coreutils-stdbuf) breaks package-qa when the single-binary
> PACKAGECONFIG is used:
>
> ERROR: coreutils-8.31-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: /usr/bin/stdbuf
> contained in packag
Then this needs to be submitted for master first, we have a strict policy
for that.
Alex
On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 at 09:36, Rasmus Villemoes
wrote:
> Commit 992cec44 (coreutils: Move stdbuf into an own package
> coreutils-stdbuf) breaks package-qa when the single-binary
> PACKAGECONFIG is used:
>
> E
Commit 992cec44 (coreutils: Move stdbuf into an own package
coreutils-stdbuf) breaks package-qa when the single-binary
PACKAGECONFIG is used:
ERROR: coreutils-8.31-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: /usr/bin/stdbuf contained in
package coreutils-stdbuf requires /usr/bin/coreutils, but no providers found
