On 11/08/2011 06:18 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 16:10 -0800, Joshua Lock wrote:
All,
Here's a series of patches I developed whilst trying to play around with some
Clutter based software.
The interesting pieces may be:
Clutter 1.8 series recipes - do we want/need to keep
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 11:03 -0800, Saul Wold wrote:
On 11/08/2011 06:18 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 16:10 -0800, Joshua Lock wrote:
All,
Here's a series of patches I developed whilst trying to play around with
some
Clutter based software.
The interesting
On 15/11/11 13:38, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 11:03 -0800, Saul Wold wrote:
On 11/08/2011 06:18 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 16:10 -0800, Joshua Lock wrote:
All,
Here's a series of patches I developed whilst trying to play around with
some
Clutter based
On 11/08/2011 06:18 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 16:10 -0800, Joshua Lock wrote:
All,
Here's a series of patches I developed whilst trying to play around with some
Clutter based software.
The interesting pieces may be:
Clutter 1.8 series recipes - do we want/need to keep
On 11/07/2011 04:10 PM, Joshua Lock wrote:
All,
Here's a series of patches I developed whilst trying to play around with some
Clutter based software.
Did you look at the clutter_git versions at all? I thought I recently
saw a problem with clutter_git also with COGL.
Sau!
The interesting
On 08/11/11 09:36, Saul Wold wrote:
On 11/07/2011 04:10 PM, Joshua Lock wrote:
All,
Here's a series of patches I developed whilst trying to play around
with some
Clutter based software.
Did you look at the clutter_git versions at all? I thought I recently
saw a problem with clutter_git
All,
Here's a series of patches I developed whilst trying to play around with some
Clutter based software.
The interesting pieces may be:
Clutter 1.8 series recipes - do we want/need to keep clutter 1.6 around?
Are we OK with continuing to namespace the clutter recipes by clutter
version?
Gconf
