On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 5:49 AM Niko Mauno wrote:
>
> On 20.10.2023 19.34, Khem Raj wrote:
> > it seems you are quite sensitive to size, I wonder if opkg backend is
> > better suited for your usecase than rpm.
>
> Hi Khem, thanks for the idea. We used opkg a few years ago, however
> certain
On 20.10.2023 19.34, Khem Raj wrote:
> it seems you are quite sensitive to size, I wonder if opkg backend is
> better suited for your usecase than rpm.
Hi Khem, thanks for the idea. We used opkg a few years ago, however
certain technical reasons were in favor of rpm which we have used since.
On 10/20/23 16:00, Richard Purdie wrote:
As far as I could tell when we looked at this, the rpm world was moving
over to zstd so adding in conditional xz support for a limited use case
probably just creates a maintenance headache going forward as it isn't
something we test or plan to test?
I
On 10/20/23 6:42 AM, Niko Mauno via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
On 20.10.2023 16.00, Richard Purdie wrote:
Is it common for people to need to manipulate rpms on target without
rpm being present using busybox? Do you know if busybox plans to add
zstd support?
As far as I could tell when we
On 20.10.2023 16.00, Richard Purdie wrote:
Is it common for people to need to manipulate rpms on target without
rpm being present using busybox? Do you know if busybox plans to add
zstd support?
As far as I could tell when we looked at this, the rpm world was moving
over to zstd so adding in
On Fri, 2023-10-20 at 12:44 +, Niko Mauno via
lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> From: Niko Mauno
>
> Commit 4a4d5f78a6962dda5f63e9891825c80a8a87bf66 ("package_rpm: use zstd
> instead of xz") changed the rpm package compressor from 'xz' to 'zstd'
> which results in decompression failure with
From: Niko Mauno
Commit 4a4d5f78a6962dda5f63e9891825c80a8a87bf66 ("package_rpm: use zstd
instead of xz") changed the rpm package compressor from 'xz' to 'zstd'
which results in decompression failure with BusyBox-provided 'rpm2cpio'
applet and 'rpm' applet when given the '-i' (Install package)
