On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote:
Op 22 jun 2011, om 18:00 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 18:43 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
changes since V1
Separate out non gcc changes to a different pull request
Patches are not
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 01:40 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote:
Op 22 jun 2011, om 18:00 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 18:43 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
changes since V1
Separate out non
On 06/22/2011 09:00 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 18:43 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
changes since V1
Separate out non gcc changes to a different pull request
Patches are not attached inline due to sheer size of them
as they might choke patchwork. The are only on the branch
The
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 18:43 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
changes since V1
Separate out non gcc changes to a different pull request
Patches are not attached inline due to sheer size of them
as they might choke patchwork. The are only on the branch
The following changes since commit
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 17:00 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
I'm afraid I don't like having gcc 4.6 being so publicly visible. Its
fine for the recipe names but the PV itself really needs to be something
like 4.6.2+svn.
Well, er, gcc 4.6.1 hasn't even been released yet. I think 4.6.0
+svn (or
Op 22 jun 2011, om 18:00 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 18:43 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
changes since V1
Separate out non gcc changes to a different pull request
Patches are not attached inline due to sheer size of them
as they might choke patchwork. The
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 17:05 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 17:00 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
I'm afraid I don't like having gcc 4.6 being so publicly visible. Its
fine for the recipe names but the PV itself really needs to be something
like 4.6.2+svn.
Well, er, gcc
