Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V2 1/9] busybox: remove the postinst part of the recipe

2013-06-18 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:37 PM, ChenQi qi.c...@windriver.com wrote: On 06/18/2013 01:52 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 2:49 AM, qi.c...@windriver.com wrote: From: Chen Qi qi.c...@windriver.com Remove the pkg_postinst_${PN} from this recipe, as it's redundant. It

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V2 1/9] busybox: remove the postinst part of the recipe

2013-06-17 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 2:49 AM, qi.c...@windriver.com wrote: From: Chen Qi qi.c...@windriver.com Remove the pkg_postinst_${PN} from this recipe, as it's redundant. It basically wants to do the same thing as the update-alternatives does. But it doesn't do it well. Signed-off-by: Chen Qi

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V2 1/9] busybox: remove the postinst part of the recipe

2013-06-17 Thread ChenQi
On 06/18/2013 01:52 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 2:49 AM, qi.c...@windriver.com wrote: From: Chen Qi qi.c...@windriver.com Remove the pkg_postinst_${PN} from this recipe, as it's redundant. It basically wants to do the same thing as the update-alternatives does. But it

[OE-core] [PATCH V2 1/9] busybox: remove the postinst part of the recipe

2013-06-16 Thread Qi.Chen
From: Chen Qi qi.c...@windriver.com Remove the pkg_postinst_${PN} from this recipe, as it's redundant. It basically wants to do the same thing as the update-alternatives does. But it doesn't do it well. Signed-off-by: Chen Qi qi.c...@windriver.com --- meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox.inc |