Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V3 2/2] bluez4: conflicts with/replaces bluez5 - upgrade real-life tests

2013-03-26 Thread Iorga, Cristian
Hello all, Initial status: QEmu machine core-image-sato. Follow the /update/upgrade/install path as below: Fact: bluez5, at this point, is not an upgrade path for bluez4. Logical conclusion would be that bluez 5 and bluez4 should be provided only with RCONFLICTS (case 2), so that doing an:

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V3 2/2] bluez4: conflicts with/replaces bluez5 - upgrade real-life tests

2013-03-26 Thread Martin Jansa
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 04:42:07PM +, Iorga, Cristian wrote: Hello all, Initial status: QEmu machine core-image-sato. Follow the /update/upgrade/install path as below: Fact: bluez5, at this point, is not an upgrade path for bluez4. Logical conclusion would be that bluez 5 and

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V3 2/2] bluez4: conflicts with/replaces bluez5 - upgrade real-life tests

2013-03-26 Thread Iorga, Cristian
Hi Martin, For Case 1, I have not tested how happy were connman, ofono, and others after the upgrade. :-) I guess they were not happy at all, at least at runtime. Also, given your thoughts/observation, please advise on how we should proceed on this one. An option to postpone this upgrade until