On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 14:25 +, Richard Purdie wrote:
> Thanks for reworking this, it does look a lot better and should stop
> some of the bbclass proliferation we're seeing.
>
> I assume all the code was functionally unchanged in the move?
Correct.
>
> On Sun, 2018-11-18 at 13:19 -0600,
Thanks for reworking this, it does look a lot better and should stop
some of the bbclass proliferation we're seeing.
I assume all the code was functionally unchanged in the move?
On Sun, 2018-11-18 at 13:19 -0600, Joshua Watt wrote:
> python () {
> -if