On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 14:45 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
We could do with clearly documenting this in the bitbake manual. I
suspect users would expect the highest version to win and we probably
should change the behaviour but I'm open to other opinions.
The original intent with
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:52 AM, Phil Blundell ph...@gnu.org wrote:
Actually, to some extent I consider it a bit of a misfeature that the
layer priority is specified by the layer rather than by the user in
bblayers.conf, since this makes it harder to vary the stack-up order
without local
