[OE-core] [for-denzil 1/3] bitbake: command: add error to return of runCommand

2013-01-11 Thread Matthew McClintock
From: Christopher Larson chris_lar...@mentor.com Currently, command.py can return an error message from runCommand, due to being unable to run the command, yet few of our UIs (just hob) can handle it today. This can result in seeing a TypeError with traceback in certain rare circumstances. To

Re: [OE-core] split mtd-utils

2013-01-11 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
Along the lines of the oe classic patch I propose to split as follows: mtd-utils-jffs2 package containing jffs2dump jffs2reader mkfs.jffs2 mtd-utils-ubifs package containing: mkfs.ubifs ubiattach ubicrc32 ubidetach ubiformat ubimkvol ubinfo ubinize ubirename ubirmvol ubirsvol ubiupdatevol

Re: [OE-core] split mtd-utils

2013-01-11 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
2013/1/11 Eric Bénard e...@eukrea.com Hi Frans, [...] IIRC sumtol is used for jffs2 images (to create the erase block summary) so that may better fit into mtd-utils-jffs2 Also, nftl* rfd* doc* ftl* serve_image may go into a separate packate (mtd-utils-misc ?) as I believe those tools are

Re: [OE-core] split mtd-utils

2013-01-11 Thread Eric Bénard
Hi Frans, Le Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:40:43 +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks fransmeulenbro...@gmail.com a écrit : Along the lines of the oe classic patch I propose to split as follows: mtd-utils-jffs2 package containing jffs2dump jffs2reader mkfs.jffs2 mtd-utils-ubifs package containing:

Re: [OE-core] glib2.0 and dbus dependency

2013-01-11 Thread ChenQi
On 01/11/2013 02:31 AM, Yi Qingliang wrote: when compiling using 4 threads, I got following error. the glib2.0-native want find dbus header file. If I compiled dbus/dbus-natigve, and then compile glib2.0 OK. when grep glib2.0 bb files, I can't find dbus in dependency, why? Hi, What's the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V2] connman: upgrade to 1.10

2013-01-11 Thread Burton, Ross
On 10 January 2013 23:59, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: Please don't use qemu, use something like qemuall or allqemu since I have some thoughts about how this might interact with the qemu class, most involving the word badly ;-). That was my fault, I thought it was

Re: [OE-core] [oe-commits] Otavio Salvador : libnl: Update to 3.2.18

2013-01-11 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:52:29PM +, g...@git.openembedded.org wrote: Module: openembedded-core.git Branch: master Commit: 5de138939c42b0a6d80732130b2617fd60a7d545 URL: http://git.openembedded.org/?p=openembedded-core.gita=commit;h=5de138939c42b0a6d80732130b2617fd60a7d545 Author:

[OE-core] [PATCH V3 2/2] connman-conf: configures connman in qemu machines

2013-01-11 Thread Cristian Iorga
For qemu machines, connman should not configure virtual wired interfaces. Wired interfaces (eth0) are assigned static IP addresses by the virtual machine manager (qemu). This packages places the eth0 interface in a list of blacklisted interfaces, forbiding connman administering wired interfaces

[OE-core] [PATCH V3 0/2] connman 1.10 upgrade and qemu networking fix

2013-01-11 Thread Cristian Iorga
This set of patches will: - update connman to 1.10 - solve the issue of lost connectivity with qemu machines connman will clear previous configuration for a network interface, rendering qemu machines eth0 unusable, because there is no DHCP server to be used, and the static

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V3 2/2] connman-conf: configures connman in qemu machines

2013-01-11 Thread Martin Jansa
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:53:38PM +0200, Cristian Iorga wrote: For qemu machines, connman should not configure virtual wired interfaces. Wired interfaces (eth0) are assigned static IP addresses by the virtual machine manager (qemu). This packages places the eth0 interface in a list of

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V3 2/2] connman-conf: configures connman in qemu machines

2013-01-11 Thread Iorga, Cristian
Yes, I think I missed that. Should I resend the patches? -Original Message- From: Martin Jansa [mailto:martin.ja...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 1:28 PM To: Iorga, Cristian Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V3 2/2] connman-conf:

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V3 2/2] connman-conf: configures connman in qemu machines

2013-01-11 Thread Enrico Scholz
Cristian Iorga cristian.iorga-ral2jqcrhueavxtiumw...@public.gmane.org writes: For qemu machines, connman should not configure virtual wired interfaces. This is not a qemu-only problem but affects all platforms with nfs rootfs, isn't it? Setup whether to disable configuration of interface

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V3 2/2] connman-conf: configures connman in qemu machines

2013-01-11 Thread Iorga, Cristian
Hello Enrico, see my answers below. Regards, Cristian -Original Message- From: Enrico Scholz [mailto:enrico.sch...@sigma-chemnitz.de] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 2:23 PM To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Cc: Cristian Iorga Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] connman-conf:

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] add meta-toolchain-qt

2013-01-11 Thread Eric Bénard
- this allows the creation of a SDK containing all the needed libraries to develop QT4 for X applications - the recipes were factorized to share as much code as possible - binaries generated using the toolchain were run tested on an ARMv7 target - both qt qte toolchains were build tested for

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] gitignore: only ignore meta- directories

2013-01-11 Thread Eric Bénard
else for example meta-toolchain-qte.bb is also ignored. Signed-off-by: Eric Bénard e...@eukrea.com --- .gitignore |4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index a2141f0..6ece6b8 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] lib/oe/path.py: Use shutil.rmtree if the path we wish to remove is a directory.

2013-01-11 Thread Chris Larson
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Martin Ertsaas marti...@gmail.com wrote: On 01/10/13 15:15, Chris Larson wrote: On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:50 AM, Martin Ertsaas marti...@gmail.comwrote: On mac, os.unlink can not be done to remove directories, and so we have to explicitly use

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 00/21][RFC v3] systemd Integration

2013-01-11 Thread Radu Moisan
On 01/10/2013 08:27 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com wrote: On 01/09/2013 07:14 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com wrote: As Ross suggested I've done the following changes to the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V2] connman: upgrade to 1.10

2013-01-11 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 23:59 +, Richard Purdie wrote: On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 20:26 +, Burton, Ross wrote: On 10 January 2013 18:42, Cristian Iorga cristian.io...@intel.com wrote: 0002-storage.c-If-there-is-no-d_type-support-use-fstatat.patch - adapted to the new version

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] gcc: enable multilib for target gcc

2013-01-11 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 11:00 +0200, Constantin Musca wrote: - add a task to setup multilib configuration for target gcc - this commit adapts Nitin Kamble's work to gcc 4.7 Tests: root@qemux86-64:~# gcc -m64 t.c -o t root@qemux86-64:~# file t t: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] gcc: enable multilib for target gcc

2013-01-11 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 15:20 +, Richard Purdie wrote: On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 11:00 +0200, Constantin Musca wrote: - add a task to setup multilib configuration for target gcc - this commit adapts Nitin Kamble's work to gcc 4.7 Tests: root@qemux86-64:~# gcc -m64 t.c -o t

[OE-core] bitbake hangs forever when PR serv is enabled

2013-01-11 Thread Martin Jansa
When building world which takes long time to finish I sometimes see bitbake hanging forever. It didn't happen until I've enabled PR Service. But maybe it's not caused by PR Service and it's just coincidence. I've to kill python processes manually and this traceback shown: Exception in thread

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V2] connman: upgrade to 1.10

2013-01-11 Thread Iorga, Cristian
Hello Richard, Saul, Which versions of connman upgrade patches were used? V2 or V3? Also, does the issue will be present with V3 also? Regards, Cristian -Original Message- From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org]

[OE-core] [PATCH] db: upgrade to 5.3.21

2013-01-11 Thread Cristian Iorga
License file changed the year, triggering a change in checksum Signed-off-by: Cristian Iorga cristian.io...@intel.com --- meta/recipes-support/db/{db_5.3.15.bb = db_5.3.21.bb} |8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) rename meta/recipes-support/db/{db_5.3.15.bb =

[OE-core] [PATCH] quota: upgrade to 4.01

2013-01-11 Thread Cristian Iorga
Signed-off-by: Cristian Iorga cristian.io...@intel.com --- meta/recipes-extended/quota/{quota_4.00.bb = quota_4.01.bb} |4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) rename meta/recipes-extended/quota/{quota_4.00.bb = quota_4.01.bb} (85%) diff --git

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] db: upgrade to 5.3.21

2013-01-11 Thread Mark Hatle
On 1/11/13 10:18 AM, Cristian Iorga wrote: License file changed the year, triggering a change in checksum Any change is BerkleyDB versions requires us to verify RPM and Smart functionality. I don't have any objections to the change -- just pointing that out. --Mark Signed-off-by:

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] db: upgrade to 5.3.21

2013-01-11 Thread Iorga, Cristian
Noted. Thanks, I will do that on Monday. Regards, Cristian -Original Message- From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of Mark Hatle Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 6:36 PM To:

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 00/21][RFC v3] systemd Integration

2013-01-11 Thread Saul Wold
On 01/11/2013 07:12 AM, Radu Moisan wrote: On 01/10/2013 08:27 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com wrote: On 01/09/2013 07:14 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com wrote: As Ross suggested

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V2] connman: upgrade to 1.10

2013-01-11 Thread Saul Wold
On 01/11/2013 07:35 AM, Iorga, Cristian wrote: Hello Richard, Saul, Which versions of connman upgrade patches were used? V2 or V3? I used the V2 version since that what I had available, I wanted to get a sanity run it for that and the gcc multilib changes (which also broke gcc-runtime).

[OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED PULL 00/28] Automake patches other fixes

2013-01-11 Thread Saul Wold
Richard, Another batch of automake related changes from Marko (Thanks Marko!) Along with some other fixes and patches, I have again included the cairo patch as I am not sure what your objection to it is. Sau! The following changes since commit 1e63a3b7b7915d40bb59976a02b9f53968997ed3:

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/5] lttng2-ust: rename to lttng-ust

2013-01-11 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-ust was removed by a previous patch, which also removed the naming conflict that caused the lttng-2.0 version of lttng-ust to be named lttng2-ust. lttng2-ust was the only lttng-2.0 recipe to be named in this way and since that

[OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] lttng: remove references to legacy lttng recipes

2013-01-11 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com 'legacy' lttng was removed, so we need to remove the references to the legacy lttng recipes, namely lttng-control and lttng-viewer. Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com --- meta-yocto/conf/distro/include/distro_alias.inc | 2 --

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/5] Remove legacy lttng

2013-01-11 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com This patchset removes legacy lttng, which hasn't been operational in Yocto for awhile now. lttng-2.0 is the current version, which was recently updated and now does work. With legacy lttng gone, lttng-2.0 can be renamed back to lttng, which this patchset

[OE-core] [PATCH 3/5] recipes-kernel/lttng-2.0: rename to recipes-kernel/lttng

2013-01-11 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com recipes-kernel/lttng was removed by a previous patch, which also removed the naming conflict that caused the lttng-2.0 version of lttng to be named recipes-kernel/lttng-2.0. Since the naming conflict has disappeared, we can go back to the simpler naming.

[OE-core] [PATCH 5/5] recipe_color.inc: add lttng recipes

2013-01-11 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com Add entries for the new lttng-2.0 recipes lttng-modules, lttng-tools, and babeltrace, to maintain consistency. Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com --- meta-yocto/conf/distro/include/recipe_color.inc | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] alsa-utils: add bash as a dependency of the alsa-utils-alsaconf rpm.

2013-01-11 Thread Andrei Gherzan
ack *Andrei Gherzan* mobile +40.744.478.414 fax +40.31.816.28.12 Email: and...@gherzan.ro Email: andrei.gher...@windriver.com Romania On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Florin Sarbu florin.sa...@windriver.comwrote: alsa-utils-alsaconf rpm contains the bash script alsaconf. In order to have

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/5] lttng2-ust: rename to lttng-ust

2013-01-11 Thread Saul Wold
On 01/11/2013 11:20 AM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote: From: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-ust was removed by a previous patch, which also removed the naming conflict that caused the lttng-2.0 version of lttng-ust to be named lttng2-ust. lttng2-ust was the only

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/5] Remove legacy lttng

2013-01-11 Thread Saul Wold
On 01/11/2013 11:20 AM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote: From: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com This patchset removes legacy lttng, which hasn't been operational in Yocto for awhile now. lttng-2.0 is the current version, which was recently updated and now does work. With legacy lttng gone,

[OE-core] [PATCH] xz: LICENSE field is wrong

2013-01-11 Thread Saul Wold
xz contains a GPLv3 m4 macro which is used at build time, this does not make the installed or runtime items GPLv3, which is what the LICESNE field pertains to, therefor remove it from the LICENSE field. Signed-off-by: Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com --- meta/recipes-extended/xz/xz_5.1.2alpha.bb |

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 00/21][RFC v3] systemd Integration

2013-01-11 Thread Saul Wold
On 01/08/2013 04:24 AM, Radu Moisan wrote: As Ross suggested I've done the following changes to the previous set: * added two patches (the first two) that address multiple init systems support,\ as in shifting from default hardcoded sysvinit to something more generic while the default values

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/3] Remove legacy lttng, v3

2013-01-11 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com This patchset removes legacy lttng, which hasn't been operational in Yocto for awhile now. lttng-2.0 is the current version, which was recently updated and now does work. With legacy lttng gone, lttng-2.0 can be renamed back to lttng, which this patchset

[OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] recipes-kernel/lttng-2.0: rename to recipes-kernel/lttng

2013-01-11 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com recipes-kernel/lttng was removed by a previous patch, which also removed the naming conflict that caused the lttng-2.0 version of lttng to be named recipes-kernel/lttng-2.0. Since the naming conflict has disappeared, we can go back to the simpler naming.

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] lttng: remove 'legacy' lttng

2013-01-11 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com This removes 'legacy' lttng - it hasn't actually worked for awhile now, and has been replaced by equivalent functionality in recipes-kernel/lttng-2.0 (which will be renamed to lttng in a follow-up patch). Fixes [YOCTO #3303]. Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] lttng2-ust: rename to lttng-ust

2013-01-11 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-ust was removed by a previous patch, which also removed the naming conflict that caused the lttng-2.0 version of lttng-ust to be named lttng2-ust. lttng2-ust was the only lttng-2.0 recipe to be named in this way and since that

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V6 6/6] core-image-sato: support read-only rootfs

2013-01-11 Thread Saul Wold
On 01/07/2013 06:22 PM, ChenQi wrote: On 01/07/2013 06:30 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:06 AM, ChenQi qi.c...@windriver.com wrote: On 01/07/2013 03:05 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 7:44 AM, qi.c...@windriver.com wrote: From: Chen Qi

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V6 2/6] image.bbclass: add two funtions to support readonly rootfs

2013-01-11 Thread Saul Wold
On 01/06/2013 01:44 AM, qi.c...@windriver.com wrote: From: Chen Qi qi.c...@windriver.com read_only_rootfs_hook: this funtion is invoked only if 'read-only-rootfs' is in IMAGE_FEATURES. It tweaks some basic files and makes populate- volatile.sh script run at rootfs time. choose_volatile_conf:

Re: [OE-core] glib2.0 and dbus dependency

2013-01-11 Thread Yi Qingliang
On Friday, January 11, 2013 05:30:55 PM ChenQi wrote: On 01/11/2013 02:31 AM, Yi Qingliang wrote: when compiling using 4 threads, I got following error. the glib2.0-native want find dbus header file. If I compiled dbus/dbus-natigve, and then compile glib2.0 OK. when grep glib2.0 bb