Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] connman: enable connman client

2013-02-23 Thread Ross Burton
Hi Cristian, On Friday, 22 February 2013 at 20:10, Cristian Iorga wrote: - --disable-client \ I'd prefer to see an explicit --enable-client here to make it clear what we're turning on and off. + install -m 0755 ${S}/client/connmanctl ${D}${bindir} ${S} (source) should be ${B} (build),

Re: [OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED PULL 00/41] Selected Updates and fixes

2013-02-23 Thread Mike Looijmans
On 02/22/2013 10:52 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: On 22 February 2013 07:11, Mike Looijmans mike.looijm...@topic.nl wrote: If there's anything I can do to help let me know. Is this now blocking the integration? I haven't found any issues with the dependencies, but I've only tested with the

Re: [OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED PULL 00/41] Selected Updates and fixes

2013-02-23 Thread Burton, Ross
On 23 February 2013 09:33, Mike Looijmans mike.looijm...@topic.nl wrote: This is what opkg reports on my running systems, with the libmount patch applied, looks fine to me, a few require libmount1, and none require util-linux itself. For example: Good, just local weirdness for me then. Ross

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] connman: enable connman client

2013-02-23 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Saturday 23 February 2013 09:02:07 Jack Mitchell wrote: On 02/23/13 08:34, Ross Burton wrote: Also the fact that you have to do this is depressing. I wonder why upstream doesn't want to install any of the tools? Connmanctl is a helper, even though I have connman in my image, I wouldn't

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] connman: enable connman client

2013-02-23 Thread Jack Mitchell
On 02/23/13 11:30, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Saturday 23 February 2013 09:02:07 Jack Mitchell wrote: On 02/23/13 08:34, Ross Burton wrote: Also the fact that you have to do this is depressing. I wonder why upstream doesn't want to install any of the tools? Connmanctl is a helper, even though I