[OE-core] [PATCH V2] ruby: Remove __has_include and __has_include_next from preprocessed header file

2020-01-23 Thread Khem Raj
define is redefined | /tmp/20200123-2021083-2c601q.h:13849:9: error: "__has_include" cannot be used as a macro name | 13849 | #define __has_include __has_include | | ^ | compilation terminated due to -Wfatal-errors. Since compiler already will take care of it int

[OE-core] [PATCH v3] logrotate.py: improve oeqa test implementation

2020-01-23 Thread Trevor Gamblin
From: Trevor Gamblin See bug https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13632 Autobuilder tests occasionally fail, reporting that a new logfile could not be created. While this failure did occur multiple times, it could not be manually reproduced. However, there are issues with the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] arm-trusted-firmware: add upstream version 2.2

2020-01-23 Thread akuster808
On 1/23/20 2:17 PM, Ross Burton wrote: > On 23/01/2020 21:43, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 4:00 PM Denys Dmytriyenko >> wrote: >>> >>> From: Denys Dmytriyenko >>> >>> Many BSPs require ARM Trusted Firmware (also known as Trusted >>> Firmware-A). >>> To avoid duplicating

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] arm-trusted-firmware: add upstream version 2.2

2020-01-23 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2020-01-23 at 22:17 +, Ross Burton wrote: > On 23/01/2020 21:43, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 4:00 PM Denys Dmytriyenko > > wrote: > > > From: Denys Dmytriyenko > > > > > > Many BSPs require ARM Trusted Firmware (also known as Trusted > > > Firmware-A). > > > To

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] arm-trusted-firmware: add upstream version 2.2

2020-01-23 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 02:39:52PM -0800, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 2:17 PM Ross Burton wrote: > > On 23/01/2020 21:43, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 4:00 PM Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > >> > > >> From: Denys Dmytriyenko > > >> > > >> Many BSPs require

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] arm-trusted-firmware: add upstream version 2.2

2020-01-23 Thread Andre McCurdy
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 2:17 PM Ross Burton wrote: > On 23/01/2020 21:43, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 4:00 PM Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > >> > >> From: Denys Dmytriyenko > >> > >> Many BSPs require ARM Trusted Firmware (also known as Trusted Firmware-A). > >> To avoid

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/5] meson: update 0.52.1 -> 0.53.0

2020-01-23 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 1:43 PM Alexander Kanavin wrote: > > I once more suggest we deal with all those special cases where linker > customization is desired later on. New meson isn’t going to work without this > change. > Perhaps I am missing something, what does new version gets us that we

[OE-core] [PATCH] module.bbclass: swap AR and LD order

2020-01-23 Thread Jason Wessel
The 5.x kernels seem to have made a change to the linker command line processing. When trying to build out of tree kernel modules, such as the virtualbox guest additions, the following error is printed: | make[1]: Entering directory

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] arm-trusted-firmware: add upstream version 2.2

2020-01-23 Thread Ross Burton
On 23/01/2020 21:43, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 4:00 PM Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: From: Denys Dmytriyenko Many BSPs require ARM Trusted Firmware (also known as Trusted Firmware-A). To avoid duplicating efforts of adding very similar recipes to BSP layers, add an upstream

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] arm-trusted-firmware: add upstream version 2.2

2020-01-23 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 04:10:33PM -0600, Joshua Watt wrote: > > On 1/23/20 4:05 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > >On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 04:43:23PM -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > >>On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 4:00 PM Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > >>>From: Denys Dmytriyenko > >>> > >>>Many BSPs require

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] arm-trusted-firmware: add upstream version 2.2

2020-01-23 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 5:05 PM Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 04:43:23PM -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 4:00 PM Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > > > > > From: Denys Dmytriyenko > > > > > > Many BSPs require ARM Trusted Firmware (also known as Trusted

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] arm-trusted-firmware: add upstream version 2.2

2020-01-23 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 5:10 PM Joshua Watt wrote: > > > On 1/23/20 4:05 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 04:43:23PM -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 4:00 PM Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > >>> From: Denys Dmytriyenko > >>> > >>> Many BSPs require ARM

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] packagegroup-base: only pull in dosfstools if licensing allows

2020-01-23 Thread Ross Burton
On 23/01/2020 19:49, Andre McCurdy wrote: Should this be using incompatible_license_contains() instead of bb.utils.contains()? Yes, it should. Thanks for reminding me of that function. Ross -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] arm-trusted-firmware: add upstream version 2.2

2020-01-23 Thread Joshua Watt
On 1/23/20 4:05 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 04:43:23PM -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 4:00 PM Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: From: Denys Dmytriyenko Many BSPs require ARM Trusted Firmware (also known as Trusted Firmware-A). To avoid duplicating

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] arm-trusted-firmware: add upstream version 2.2

2020-01-23 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 04:43:23PM -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 4:00 PM Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > > > From: Denys Dmytriyenko > > > > Many BSPs require ARM Trusted Firmware (also known as Trusted Firmware-A). > > To avoid duplicating efforts of adding very similar

[OE-core] ✗ patchtest: failure for "procps: enable optional system..." and 2 more (rev3)

2020-01-23 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: "procps: enable optional system..." and 2 more (rev3) Revision: 3 URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/22252/ State : failure == Summary == Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is an automated response. Several tests

[OE-core] ✗ patchtest: failure for "procps: enable optional system..." and 2 more (rev4)

2020-01-23 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: "procps: enable optional system..." and 2 more (rev4) Revision: 4 URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/22252/ State : failure == Summary == Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is an automated response. Several tests

[OE-core] ✗ patchtest: failure for "procps: enable optional system..." and 2 more (rev2)

2020-01-23 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: "procps: enable optional system..." and 2 more (rev2) Revision: 2 URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/22252/ State : failure == Summary == Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is an automated response. Several tests

[OE-core] [PATCH v2 3/3] buildhistory: Allow customising buildhistory tags

2020-01-23 Thread Dan McGregor
From: Daniel McGregor Allow setting custom buildhistory tag prefixes. This allows multiple build directories to share one buildhistory git repository with multiple worktrees. Signed-off-by: Daniel McGregor --- meta/classes/buildhistory.bbclass | 7 --- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3

[OE-core] [PATCH v2 2/3] cmake: prefer CMAKE_BUILD_PARALLEL_LEVEL

2020-01-23 Thread Dan McGregor
From: Daniel McGregor cmake 3.12 introduced this environment variable. Prefer it to passing PARALLEL_MAKE and PARALLEL_MAKEINST on the cmake command line, because it gets passed to second stage cmake invocations while command-line arguments do not (for example, multi-stage clang builds)

[OE-core] [PATCH v2 1/3] procps: enable optional systemd support

2020-01-23 Thread Dan McGregor
From: Daniel McGregor procps includes support for listing the owning unit of a process, but this support is disabled by default. Enable support using a PACKAGECONFIG that depends on the systemd DISTRO_FEATURE. Signed-off-by: Daniel McGregor --- meta/recipes-extended/procps/procps_3.3.15.bb |

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] arm-trusted-firmware: add upstream version 2.2

2020-01-23 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 4:00 PM Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > From: Denys Dmytriyenko > > Many BSPs require ARM Trusted Firmware (also known as Trusted Firmware-A). > To avoid duplicating efforts of adding very similar recipes to BSP layers, > add an upstream reference implementation to

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/5] meson: update 0.52.1 -> 0.53.0

2020-01-23 Thread Alexander Kanavin
I once more suggest we deal with all those special cases where linker customization is desired later on. New meson isn’t going to work without this change. Alex > On 23 Jan 2020, at 20.27, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 9:34 AM Alexander Kanavin > wrote: >> >> Signed-off-by:

[OE-core] [PATCH v2] arm-trusted-firmware: add upstream version 2.2

2020-01-23 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
From: Denys Dmytriyenko Many BSPs require ARM Trusted Firmware (also known as Trusted Firmware-A). To avoid duplicating efforts of adding very similar recipes to BSP layers, add an upstream reference implementation to openembedded-core, which can be customized by BSPs, if needed. Signed-off-by:

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/5] default-distrovars.inc: add vfat to DISTRO_FEATURES

2020-01-23 Thread Alexander Kanavin
Sorry but certainly no. It’s already hard enough to make ptests pass with just the one standard configuration tested by the autobuilder. I still have a handful of components with cryptic failures left to fix, so if you can help with valgrind, mdadm or lttng failures I’d appreciate that. If you

[OE-core] [PATCH] tune-cortexa72-cortexa53.inc: Adding missing TUNE_FEATURES

2020-01-23 Thread Jaewon Lee
Without the proper default tune in TUNE_FEATURES, certain variables won't expand correctly. MACHINEOVERRIDES won't add cortexa72-cortexa53: TUNE_CCARGS won't add -mtune=cortexa72.cortexa-53, generating the toolchain incorrectly. Adding missing 'cortexa72-cortexa53' to both

[OE-core] ✗ patchtest: failure for "procps: enable optional system..." and 2 more

2020-01-23 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: "procps: enable optional system..." and 2 more Revision: 1 URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/22252/ State : failure == Summary == Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is an automated response. Several tests have been

[OE-core] [PATCH] arm-trusted-firmware: add upstream version 2.2

2020-01-23 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
From: Denys Dmytriyenko Many BSPs require ARM Trusted Firmware (also known as Trusted Firmware-A). To avoid duplicating efforts of adding very similar recipes to BSP layers, add an upstream reference implementation to openembedded-core, which can be customized by BSPs, if needed. Signed-off-by:

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] cmake: prefer CMAKE_BUILD_PARALLEL_LEVEL

2020-01-23 Thread Dan McGregor
From: Daniel McGregor cmake 3.12 introduced this environment variable. Prefer it to passing PARALLEL_MAKE and PARALLEL_MAKEINST on the cmake command line, because it gets passed to second stage cmake invocations while command-line arguments do not (for example, multi-stage clang builds)

[OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] Allow customising buildhistory tags

2020-01-23 Thread Dan McGregor
From: Daniel McGregor Allow setting custom buildhistory tag prefixes. This allows multiple build directories to share one buildhistory git repository with multiple worktrees. Signed-off-by: Daniel McGregor --- meta/classes/buildhistory.bbclass | 7 --- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] procps: enable optional systemd support

2020-01-23 Thread Dan McGregor
From: Daniel McGregor procps includes support for listing the owning unit of a process, but this support is disabled by default. Enable support using a PACKAGECONFIG that depends on the systemd DISTRO_FEATURE. Signed-off-by: Daniel McGregor --- meta/recipes-extended/procps/procps_3.3.15.bb |

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/5] default-distrovars.inc: add vfat to DISTRO_FEATURES

2020-01-23 Thread André Draszik
Hi, On Thu, 2020-01-23 at 18:34 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > This is beneficial for parted ptests in particular, as > they expect vfat functionality to work. Could you also update the parted ptests to skip or delete those tests that depend on vfat, please? I.e. when the DISTRO_FEATURE is

[OE-core] [PATCH 3/4] nss: Pass NSS_USE_ARM_HW_CRYPTO as define in CFLAGS

2020-01-23 Thread Khem Raj
Use NSS_USE_ARM_HW_CRYPTO to detect USE_ARM_GCM, since there are dependent, without this we control the crypto code function inclusion in build but do not control the call sites, which can result in undefined symbols e.g. Linux_SINGLE_SHLIB/gcm.o: in function `gcmHash_InitContext':

[OE-core] [PATCH 4/4] libucontext: Add recipe

2020-01-23 Thread Khem Raj
Help musl based systems provide ucontext APIs Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- .../0001-pass-LDFLAGS-to-link-step.patch | 31 ++ meta/recipes-core/musl/libucontext_git.bb | 62 +++ 2 files changed, 93 insertions(+) create mode 100644

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/4] ruby: Remove __has_include and __has_include_next from preprocessed header file

2020-01-23 Thread Khem Raj
define is redefined | /tmp/20200123-2021083-2c601q.h:13849:9: error: "__has_include" cannot be used as a macro name | 13849 | #define __has_include __has_include | | ^ | compilation terminated due to -Wfatal-errors. Since compiler already will take care of it int

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/4] Fixes found with master versions of clang/gcc

2020-01-23 Thread Khem Raj
libucontext is library implementation for ucontext APIs which in case of glibc are bundled into C library but not for musl, this helps compiling apps needing these APIs on musl, e.g. chromium The following changes since commit ca3993cc4b13d4e661228cee6fb9448adfd0a4ba: bitbake: tests/fetch:

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/4] perf: Pass LDSHARED and CCLD via EXTRA_OEMAKE

2020-01-23 Thread Khem Raj
python code underneath is smart and pokes at python installation in sysroot for compile environment, the overrides from EXTRA_OEMAKE are ofcourse preferred but it falls back to python3's distutils/sysconfig for rest of them, and it does use CCLD and LDSHARED for linking, when we use clang to

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] packagegroup-base: only pull in dosfstools if licensing allows

2020-01-23 Thread Andre McCurdy
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 6:46 AM Ross Burton wrote: > > packagegroup-base-vfat RRECOMMENDS on dosfstools, but this is GPLv3 so > may be blacklisted. Respect INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE and don't recommend if > GPL-3.0 has been blacklisted. > > Signed-off-by: Ross Burton > --- >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/5] meson: update 0.52.1 -> 0.53.0

2020-01-23 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 9:34 AM Alexander Kanavin wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin > --- > meta/classes/meson.bbclass | 9 - > meta/recipes-devtools/meson/meson.inc| 4 ++-- > .../0001-Make-CPU-family-warnings-fatal.patch| 12

Re: [OE-core] Connectivity check uris

2020-01-23 Thread Andre McCurdy
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 7:24 AM Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2020-01-23 at 09:59 -0500, Jean-Marie LEMETAYER wrote: > > On Jan 23, 2020, at 3:37 PM, Richard Purdie > > richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > > > On Thu, 2020-01-23 at 09:22 -0500, Jean-Marie LEMETAYER wrote: > > > > I

[OE-core] [PATCH] ruby: Remove __has_include and __has_include_next from preprocessed header file

2020-01-23 Thread Khem Raj
define is redefined | /tmp/20200123-2021083-2c601q.h:13849:9: error: "__has_include" cannot be used as a macro name | 13849 | #define __has_include __has_include | | ^ | compilation terminated due to -Wfatal-errors. Since compiler already will take care of it int

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/5] meson: update 0.52.1 -> 0.53.0

2020-01-23 Thread Alexander Kanavin
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin --- meta/classes/meson.bbclass | 9 - meta/recipes-devtools/meson/meson.inc| 4 ++-- .../0001-Make-CPU-family-warnings-fatal.patch| 12 ++-- ...-do-not-manipulate-the-environment-when.patch | 16

[OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] mdadm: correctly set up testing location for ptests

2020-01-23 Thread Alexander Kanavin
1. Do not clutter /, create a special-purpose dir 2. Clean up the dir after tests are done (if this is not performed, disk will overflow later in ptesting). 3. Fix up more locations in ptests to use the dir. Upstream default /var/tmp is not suitable as it is not big enough (mdadm needs about 500

[OE-core] [PATCH 5/5] elfutils: additional ptest fixes

2020-01-23 Thread Alexander Kanavin
This should address ARM64 specific failures in particular. eu-objdump is now installed on all architectures; ptests fail in its absence and pass when it is present, so it's useful at least in some scenarios in non-x86 architectures and fails gracefully otherwise. The original decision to exclude

[OE-core] [PATCH 3/5] default-distrovars.inc: add vfat to DISTRO_FEATURES

2020-01-23 Thread Alexander Kanavin
This is beneficial for parted ptests in particular, as they expect vfat functionality to work. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin --- meta/conf/distro/include/default-distrovars.inc | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/default-distrovars.inc

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/5] core-image-sato-sdk-ptest: do not pull in ptest-pkgs

2020-01-23 Thread Alexander Kanavin
The lists of ptests are defined via PTESTS_FAST and PTESTS_SLOW; ptests-pkgs also pulls in additional items that are specifically excluded from those due to causing issues with ptesting. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin --- meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato-sdk-ptest.bb | 2 -- 1 file

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 24/24] meson: update 0.52.1 -> 0.53.0

2020-01-23 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 7:48 AM Alexander Kanavin wrote: > New meson more or less forces one of 'bfd', 'lfd' or 'gold' for that > option (both as 'ld' in cross file and in LD from environment), as it is > passed directly to -fuse-ld, and that option takes only the three > variants.You can't

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 24/24] meson: update 0.52.1 -> 0.53.0

2020-01-23 Thread Alexander Kanavin
New meson more or less forces one of 'bfd', 'lfd' or 'gold' for that option (both as 'ld' in cross file and in LD from environment), as it is passed directly to -fuse-ld, and that option takes only the three variants.You can't place the actual binary name there. There is a use case for letting

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/3] virgl: enable in qemu when 'opengl' is in DISTRO_FEATURES

2020-01-23 Thread Alexander Kanavin
I forgot to mention that this is all entirely opt-in (via non-default options to 'runqemu'). By default qemu behaves exactly as before, and does not use virgl. Alex On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 at 16:38, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > virgl is a virtualized accelerated 3D graphics support for the qemu >

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] bitbake.conf: propagate 'opengl' DISTRO_FEATURE to native/nativesdk from target

2020-01-23 Thread Alexander Kanavin
This will allow better control over native virgl/qemu configurations. Adjust gtk+3/cairo native configurations to actually ignore opengl when building for -native: we do not need it, and it would cause build failures as only a limited subset of mesa-native is currently built. Drop

[OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] qemu: enable virglrenderer and glx options subject to 'opengl' DISTRO_FEATURE

2020-01-23 Thread Alexander Kanavin
Note that to actually use accelerated GL passthrough, there are two options 1) a suitable frontend need to be also enabled - gtk+ and SDL both seem to work well. Previously I struggled to make SDL work, but now it seems fine. 2) it is also possible to render off-screen with -display

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] libsdl2: enable opengl option for native/nativesdk, subject to 'opengl' in DISTRO_FEATURES

2020-01-23 Thread Alexander Kanavin
This allows virgl support in qemu with the SDL frontend Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin --- meta/recipes-graphics/libsdl2/libsdl2_2.0.10.bb | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/libsdl2/libsdl2_2.0.10.bb

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/3] virgl: enable in qemu when 'opengl' is in DISTRO_FEATURES

2020-01-23 Thread Alexander Kanavin
virgl is a virtualized accelerated 3D graphics support for the qemu guests. This patchset enables virgl in qemu, when 'opengl' is in DISTRO_FEATURES. This adds a few native dependencies to qemu-system-native (particularly, libdrm, virglrenderer and a special minimal configuration of mesa-native).

Re: [OE-core] Connectivity check uris

2020-01-23 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2020-01-23 at 09:59 -0500, Jean-Marie LEMETAYER wrote: > On Jan 23, 2020, at 3:37 PM, Richard Purdie > richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-01-23 at 09:22 -0500, Jean-Marie LEMETAYER wrote: > > > I understand the issue with blocked domains this is why I suggest > > >

Re: [OE-core] Connectivity check uris

2020-01-23 Thread Jean-Marie LEMETAYER
On Jan 23, 2020, at 3:37 PM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > On Thu, 2020-01-23 at 09:22 -0500, Jean-Marie LEMETAYER wrote: >> I understand the issue with blocked domains this is why I suggest the >> custom domain "connectivitycheck.openembedded.org". >> >> But I dont

Re: [OE-core] Connectivity check uris

2020-01-23 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2020-01-23 at 09:22 -0500, Jean-Marie LEMETAYER wrote: > I understand the issue with blocked domains this is why I suggest the > custom domain "connectivitycheck.openembedded.org". > > But I dont know if it could be an option. Can OE have a sub-domain > like that? maybe using some cdn to

Re: [OE-core] Connectivity check uris

2020-01-23 Thread Jean-Marie LEMETAYER
On Jan 23, 2020, at 2:56 PM, Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com wrote: > On 23/01/2020 13:14, Jean-Marie LEMETAYER wrote: >> So "example.com" is clearly not a good domain to do connectivity checks. >> >> The "openembedded.org" domain is good but have a slow response time. >> >> And finally

Re: [OE-core] Connectivity check uris

2020-01-23 Thread Jean-Marie LEMETAYER
On Jan 23, 2020, at 2:26 PM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > On Thu, 2020-01-23 at 08:14 -0500, Jean-Marie LEMETAYER wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> I have noticed some hang-ups at the beginning of my builds on the >> master branch. >> I have search a little and discovered

Re: [OE-core] Connectivity check uris

2020-01-23 Thread Ross Burton
On 23/01/2020 13:14, Jean-Marie LEMETAYER wrote: So "example.com" is clearly not a good domain to do connectivity checks. The "openembedded.org" domain is good but have a slow response time. And finally "google.com" which have all sort of speedy networking stuff is very efficient. Oh my

Re: [OE-core] Connectivity check uris

2020-01-23 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2020-01-23 at 08:14 -0500, Jean-Marie LEMETAYER wrote: > Hi folks, > > I have noticed some hang-ups at the beginning of my builds on the > master branch. > I have search a little and discovered that the connectivity check > made by poky > was the root cause. In fact connectivity check use

Re: [OE-core] Connectivity check uris

2020-01-23 Thread Andrey Zhizhikin
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 2:14 PM Jean-Marie LEMETAYER wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I have noticed some hang-ups at the beginning of my builds on the master > branch. > I have search a little and discovered that the connectivity check made by poky > was the root cause. In fact connectivity check use

[OE-core] Connectivity check uris

2020-01-23 Thread Jean-Marie LEMETAYER
Hi folks, I have noticed some hang-ups at the beginning of my builds on the master branch. I have search a little and discovered that the connectivity check made by poky was the root cause. In fact connectivity check use the CONNECTIVITY_CHECK_URIS variable which is by default set to

[OE-core] [PATCH v2] logrotate.py: improve oeqa test implementation

2020-01-23 Thread Trevor Gamblin
From: Trevor Gamblin See bug https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13632 Autobuilder tests occasionally fail, reporting that a new logfile could not be created. While this failure did occur multiple times, it could not be manually reproduced. However, there are issues with the

Re: [OE-core] Could oe-core be infected by virus?

2020-01-23 Thread JH
Hi Ross, On 1/23/20, Ross Burton wrote: > On 21/01/2020 11:21, JH wrote: >> The wired >> thing was that image injected so many new messages, including "Welcome >> to OpenEmbedded nodistro.0!" I have never seen in previous built image >> boot. > > If you've never seen that before, but now you do,

Re: [OE-core] Could oe-core be infected by virus?

2020-01-23 Thread Ross Burton
On 21/01/2020 11:21, JH wrote: The wired thing was that image injected so many new messages, including "Welcome to OpenEmbedded nodistro.0!" I have never seen in previous built image boot. If you've never seen that before, but now you do, then the problem is that you're not setting DISTRO in

[OE-core] [PATCH v5 1/2] u-boot-tools: Add capability of building from out-of-tree

2020-01-23 Thread Daisuke Yamane
This patch also helps to build with EXTERNALSRC. Signed-off-by: Daisuke Yamane --- meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-tools_2020.01.bb | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-tools_2020.01.bb

[OE-core] [PATCH v5 2/2] u-boot: Move B from u-boot.inc to u-boot-common.inc

2020-01-23 Thread Daisuke Yamane
Use the same value of B between u-boot and u-boot-tools. This patch also enable the out-of-tree builds of u-boot-tools actually. Signed-off-by: Daisuke Yamane --- meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common.inc | 2 ++ meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc| 2 -- 2 files changed, 2

[OE-core] ✗ patchtest: failure for "[v4] u-boot-tools: Add capabil..." and 1 more

2020-01-23 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: "[v4] u-boot-tools: Add capabil..." and 1 more Revision: 1 URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/22236/ State : failure == Summary == Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is an automated response. Several tests have been

[OE-core] [PATCH v4 2/2] u-boot: Move B from u-boot.inc to u-boot-common.inc

2020-01-23 Thread Daisuke Yamane
Use the same value of B between u-boot and u-boot-tools. This patch also enable the out-of-tree builds of u-boot-tools actually. --- meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common.inc | 2 ++ meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc| 2 -- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

[OE-core] [PATCH v4 1/2] u-boot-tools: Add capability of building from out-of-tree

2020-01-23 Thread Daisuke Yamane
This patch also helps to build with EXTERNALSRC. --- meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-tools_2020.01.bb | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-tools_2020.01.bb b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-tools_2020.01.bb index bede984..414ee33