submitted
upstream. Building for qemuarm, beagleboard and raspberrypi now (my
main 3 test platforms) and will submit patches to openembedded-devel
once it's confirmed to build.
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
-core so can't build tk 8.5 anymore
I'm currently playing around with upgrading packagekit to a more
recent version, will see how I get on. I'm busy with other work at the
minute and openembedded work is just a side project for me so it may
take a while...
--
Paul Barker
Email: p
On 17 June 2013 01:02, Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote:
samba: builds for me, I'm not using gcc-4.8 though
packagekit, gypsy, omgps: Reference deprecated/removed functions in glib
tk: tcl is version 8.6 in openembedded-core so can't build tk 8.5 anymore
I'm currently playing around
The header files for libopkg belong in the package libopkg-dev rather than
opkg-dev where they are placed by default.
Signed-off-by: Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk
---
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg.inc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools
, /usr/include/libopkg will only include the file config.h.
With this patch, other files such as opkg.h are present which are needed to
compile software which uses libopkg.
The new patch has also been submitted upstream as a fix to opkg itself.
Signed-off-by: Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk
On 18 June 2013 11:55, Zhenhua Luo zhenhua@freescale.com wrote:
-if check_gcc_march(sanity_data):
+if check_gcc_march(sanity_data) == True:
Unless there's something I've forgotten about Python, these two are
exactly equivalent.
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http
been applied,
including Khem's patches for gypsy, omgps, packagekit and tk.
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org
the combination and
issue a better error if the combination is unbuildable. Is there any
way to get such a function to run during recipe parsing and be able to
produce output before the Nothing PROVIDES error?
Thanks,
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
)} \
So if we do want to get rid of this, it shouldn't be too much work.
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org
On 20 June 2013 11:50, Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote:
On 20 June 2013 11:25, Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Thursday 20 June 2013 11:16:37 Paul Eggleton wrote:
To be honest I think ENTERPRISE_DISTRO needs to go. It's not even clear what
it should mean, and it's
]);
+ set_progname(argv[0]);
Accidental repeat?
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
thought it'd be useful to you
to know.
If you know what fix you're looking for, the applied patches and build
script can be seen at
https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk?h=packages/make
Thanks,
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
On 28 Jun 2013 14:17, Mark Hatle mark.ha...@windriver.com wrote:
On 6/28/13 5:20 AM, Paul Barker wrote:
This picks out the current version of make in Arch Linux as broken
despite it having a patch for bug #30612. I'm not sure if this is
intended, could be that the applied patch isn't
On 28 June 2013 16:11, Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote:
On 28 Jun 2013 14:17, Mark Hatle mark.ha...@windriver.com wrote:
On 6/28/13 5:20 AM, Paul Barker wrote:
If you know what fix you're looking for, the applied patches and build
script can be seen at
https
On 20 June 2013 10:39, Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote:
On 20 June 2013 03:28, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
luajit is rather a strange error, HOST_CC can't find sys/types.h or
some other common headers.
hmmm luajit does not fail here for beaglebone/qemuarm so not much I can
, standard Linux desktop/server distros may have ran
into the same problem. Maybe worth having a look if/how they handle
this.
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core
, but it at least builds now
with whatever flags.
If you want to know, see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Position-independent_code for the meaning
of PIC and GOT in this context. The rest is probably just gcc
weirdness and the way it uses registers to store the frame pointer.
--
Paul Barker
Email: p
, or am I misunderstanding how bitbake
parses variables?
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo
check.
Cheers,
Giuseppe
As stated in a previous thread, there's a snapshot of the buildtools
at http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/pub/nightly/CURRENT/buildtools/
which might work for you. It should install a known good set of tools
including make. This could be a good test for it.
--
Paul
' PACKAGECONFIG option?
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
The previous patch to fix the installation of libopkg headers has been accepted
upstream and is the next commit after the SRCREV used by the opkg recipe.
Therefore the patch can be replaced by a simple update of the SRCREV.
Signed-off-by: Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk
---
.../0001-Fix
the line
somewhere. I think the feeling is that we'd draw the line somewhere
after the toolchain you're using (from 2009 IIRC).
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core
will always be installed)
Signed-off-by: Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk
---
.../opkg/opkg/obsolete_automake_macros.patch | 15 ---
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_svn.bb| 6 ++
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644
Added update-alternatives entry linking '/usr/bin/gpgv' to 'gpgv2'. This is
required to allow apt-get to verify a signed repository.
Signed-off-by: Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk
---
meta/recipes-support/gnupg/gnupg_2.0.19.bb |5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff
so if I've done anything wrong please point me in the right
direction.
Thanks,
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http
Removed manual creation of '/usr/bin/gpg' link to 'gpg2' and replaced with
proper usage of update-alternatives.
Signed-off-by: Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk
---
meta/recipes-support/gnupg/gnupg_2.0.19.bb |9 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 00:55:05 +
Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote:
I'm setting up a signed apt repository of .deb packages built using
OpenEmbedded and I've ran into an issue with apt-get on the target
board not being able to find 'gpgv' to verify the signatures. This is
installed
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 13:25:57 +
Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Mon, 2013-03-25 at 12:57 +, Paul Barker wrote:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 00:55:05 +
Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote:
I'm setting up a signed apt repository of .deb packages built
Gnupg 2.0.19 installs 'gpgv2' but apt-get and possibly other utilities expect
to find this as 'gpgv'. A symlink is created in the same way as the link for
'gpg'.
Signed-off-by: Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk
---
meta/recipes-support/gnupg/gnupg_2.0.19.bb |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion
can send in a patch to fix this.
Thanks,
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
On 23 April 2013 09:38, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
On 23 April 2013 09:28, Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote:
Yeah, that's a bug. Presumably some tool broke when exporting the
licenses. Patches welcome!
I noticed a couple of HTML-isms in OFL-1.1 (when diffing against
License text is clearer without HTML entities such as 'amp;' and '#8212;'.
Signed-off-by: Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk
---
meta/files/common-licenses/OFL-1.1 |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/files/common-licenses/OFL-1.1
b/meta/files/common
The AGPL-3.0 file wasn't filled with the correct text. The file has been
replaced with a copy of http://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.txt.
Signed-off-by: Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk
---
meta/files/common-licenses/AGPL-3.0 | 660 ++-
1 file changed, 659
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
openembedded-de...@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
___
Openembedded
(fluidsynth in meta-multimedia IIRC) but that's a
separate issue.
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin
. Most other info should be available within the
directory I've linked to.
Let me know if this is useful.
Thanks,
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core
On 6 May 2013 20:47, Trevor Woerner twoer...@gmail.com wrote:
but until I can register for the
openembedded-devel mailing list I don't have anywhere to send it.
Have you tried emailing
openembedded-devel-ow...@lists.openembedded.org about the problems
you've had registering?
--
Paul Barker
fails.
As this slash is removed from the prefix it is added into the regular expression
used to fix up pkgconfig files later in the recipe.
This error was seen in vlc in meta-openembedded and should be solved by this
change in openembedded-core.
Signed-off-by: Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk
On 7 May 2013 10:05, Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote:
The trailing slashs on Prefix=${prefix}/ and -prefix ${prefix}/ are passed
through to the generated pkgconfig files and may be joined to paths like
/include yielding a final path with a double forward-slash (eg.
/usr//include
it be changed? Don't think it's something I can write
a patch for myself as I'm not 100% sure what the content should be.
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core
@ and Andrei as
this is raspberrypi related.
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
seem to be reported upstream, nothing in the
relevant bugtracker.
When I get time to run a build with gcc 4.8 I'll have a bash at the
obvious fix to the code (ie. sizeof(*pair) not sizeof(pair)).
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
when I select
kill from coreutils, kill.1 is provided by coreutils as well, when I
select kill from util-linux, kill.1 is provided by util-linux as well.
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
___
Openembedded-core mailing
On 19 May 2013 13:54, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 01:00:24PM +0100, Paul Barker wrote:
I'm generating a rootfs image which I intend to be usable
interactively so I've added IMAGE_FEATURES += doc-pkgs to my image
recipe. do_rootfs fails with the following
On 16 May 2013 00:02, Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote:
On 15 May 2013 21:33, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org
wrote:
(e.g. when I include
meta-raspberrypi, it changes the psplash logo, regardless of whether I'm
building for the pi).
In many ways the bbappend
On 23 May 2013 03:50, Chris Larson clar...@kergoth.com wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Phil Blundell p...@pbcl.net wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 09:47 +0100, Paul Barker wrote:
I've just sent a patch to the yocto@ list to fix this but it's brought
up two things:
1
that an IRC log will be posted after the meeting, is that correct?
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman
like crazy, others does not.
Thanks.
Hans
Looking at Show Original in gmail still shows this to be garbled.
Perhaps save it as a .patch file and attach that to an email? That
should prevent any mail client from touching it.
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http
On 10 September 2013 13:06, Hans Beckérus hans.becke...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote:
On 10 September 2013 12:44, Hans Beckérus hans.becke...@gmail.com wrote:
Could someone please verify if this patch (original v3 post) can be
saved
already ;)
You should have seen the first patches I posted! Don't worry about
looking like a fool, we were all new to this at some point.
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
the link to the source
within the body of the commit message and possibly reference the
author of the recipe you're copying this from if you can.
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
On 18 September 2013 17:07, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 16:14 +0100, Paul Barker wrote:
On 19 August 2013 19:32, Mark Hatle mark.ha...@windriver.com wrote:
On 8/19/13 1:08 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
On 08/14/2013 01:30 PM, Mark Hatle wrote
On 18 September 2013 17:48, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 17:35 +0100, Paul Barker wrote:
As a side question - is there a specific maintainer for opkg-utils?
I'd like to discuss whether two separate repositories is a good idea
or whether we'd
On 18 September 2013 19:44, Phil Blundell p...@pbcl.net wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 18:24 +0100, Paul Barker wrote:
I am planning on proposing that opkg explicitly
follow semantic versioning (http://semver.org/)
I'm not entirely sure I understand what you're saying here. Can you
expand
On 18 September 2013 21:33, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 18:24 +0100, Paul Barker wrote:
On 18 September 2013 17:48, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
I'd rather have opkg and opkg-utils merged together or next to each
to quickly review them and ensure they're still relevant.
Any comments about the organisation of janitorial/newbie friendly
tasks in general are also welcome.
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
___
Openembedded-core
.
Currently it's both as both can be seen from the YP wiki page.
For the wiki task list, maybe add an Assignee: line, so that someone knows
if the task is being worked on? Would be frustrating to work on a task only
to find someone else did the same thing.
Probably a good idea.
--
Paul
it be possible to lower the hurdles for contribution?
I've set posting to public, we'll see how this goes. Hopefully it
won't result in an increase in spam...
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
___
Openembedded
could split
update-alternatives off into its own recipe which should be dependent
on very little, allowing opkg a little more freedom in its
dependencies.
Thanks,
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
___
Openembedded
On 18 November 2013 02:54, ChenQi qi.c...@windriver.com wrote:
On 11/18/2013 02:57 AM, Paul Barker wrote:
Hi all,
I've been trying to add PACKAGECONFIG options to opkg and have ran
into a dependency loop whilst building with certain options. Enabling
curl support within opkg requires
on a real board running opkg-0.2.0. It's on my todo list but
it may be a few days or weeks before I find time to test this out.
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core
. Unfortunately that isn't me at the moment.
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
developers as well!
Thanks,
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
On 18 November 2013 16:20, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 03:31:09PM +, Paul Barker wrote:
On 18 November 2013 11:57, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
Paul: Have you any opinion of moving update-alternatives to its own
Instead of hardcoding EXTRA_OECONF to disable things, we add PACKAGECONFIG
options for gpg, curl, ssl-curl, openssl, sha256 and pathfinder. By default all
these options are disabled.
Signed-off-by: Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk
---
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg.inc | 17
Signed-off-by: Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk
---
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_0.2.0.bb | 14 ++
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_svn.bb | 14 --
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_0.2.0.bb
delete
The symlink from 'opkg' to 'opkg-cl' doesn't need to be created with
update-alternatives as there isn't any alternative. Instead it can be created by
hand in do_install_append.
Signed-off-by: Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk
---
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg.inc | 11 ---
1 file
?
Many thanks,
Paul Barker (3):
opkg: Update to version 0.2.0
opkg: Add PACKAGECONFIG options
opkg: Don't use update-alternatives
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg.inc | 28 ++--
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_0.2.0.bb | 14 ++
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg
:
0023:bb.build.deltask(task, d)
0024:
Exception: NameError: global name 'covered' is not defined
I don't really know the code in question well so I don't know whether
the solution is to remove that last for loop or to add back in the
declaration of 'covered'.
--
Paul Barker
Email
and bring those along.
Thanks,
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
All patches against libarchive in oe-core appear to be merged into the latest
release. The license checksum has changed because a couple of referenced files
have been renamed but there is no change to the license terms themselves.
Signed-off-by: Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk
---
.../0001
' then 'bitbake db' again hits the same error.
Any ideas?
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo
Thanks,
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
On 14 January 2014 13:36, Yevhen Kyriukha kirg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Paul,
2014/1/10 Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk:
On 9 January 2014 12:04, Yevhen Kyriukha kirg...@gmail.com wrote:
I define curl in PACKAGECONFIG for opkg.
After that I'm getting circular dependency errors during
.
Signed-off-by: Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk
---
meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc
b/meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc
index e2b0892..419ffcd 100644
The new provider is the opkg-utils recipe.
Signed-off-by: Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk
---
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg.inc | 12 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg.inc
b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg.inc
index
. This series partially
solves Yocto Project issue 4836.
Tested on Raspberry Pi hardware both with and without gpg added to
PACKAGECONFIG for opkg.
Paul Barker (3):
opkg-utils: Upgrade to latest git HEAD
default-providers: Change update-alternatives provider to opkg-utils
opkg: No longer
The latest version of opkg-utils PROVIDES virtual/update-alternatives via a
script copied from opkg.
Signed-off-by: Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk
---
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils_git.bb | 7 ++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes
On 15 January 2014 15:12, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 01/14/2014 06:17 PM, Paul Barker wrote:
The new provider is the opkg-utils recipe.
This seems to have triggered a failure on the AB:
| Computing transaction...error: Can't install
nativesdk-shadow-4.1.4.3-r13@i686_nativesdk
On 15 January 2014 10:04, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote:
Op 15 jan. 2014, om 03:17 heeft Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk het
volgende geschreven:
LICENSE = GPLv2+
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = file://COPYING;md5=94d55d512a9ba36caa9b7df079bae19f \
file://opkg.py
On 15 January 2014 22:37, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 01/15/2014 08:13 AM, Paul Barker wrote:
On 15 January 2014 15:12, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 01/14/2014 06:17 PM, Paul Barker wrote:
The new provider is the opkg-utils recipe.
This seems to have triggered
. This series partially
solves Yocto Project issue 4836.
Changes in v2:
- Reordered variables in opkg-utils recipe
- Added nativesdk class to opkg-utils
Paul Barker (3):
opkg-utils: Upgrade to latest git HEAD
default-providers: Change update-alternatives provider to opkg-utils
opkg
The latest version of opkg-utils PROVIDES virtual/update-alternatives via a
script copied from opkg, packaged as update-alternatives-opkg.
The nativesdk class is added to the recipe to ensure that
nativesdk-update-alternatives-opkg is built.
Signed-off-by: Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk
The new provider is the opkg-utils recipe.
Signed-off-by: Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk
---
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg.inc | 12 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg.inc
b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg.inc
index
.
Signed-off-by: Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk
---
meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc
b/meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc
index e2b0892..419ffcd 100644
On 17 January 2014 10:47, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 17:59 +, Paul Barker wrote:
The update-alternatives script has been copied from opkg to opkg-utils so the
openembedded recipe for opkg-utils is updated accordingly. Changing
them. That's my
understanding at least.
At that point I ran away and reverted the commit in question locally
as libtool terrifies me and I don't need the c++ bindings myself!
Sorry I can't be more help but I hope that points someone in the right
direction.
--
Paul Barker
Email: p
am using Arch Linux. I also checked the logs, and did not find any
isolated /usr/include or /usr/lib/ paths.
It looks like the patch Tyler Hall just posted to the mailing list
solves this problem for me - give it a try!
Thanks,
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http
libtool is sysroot aware, so pass --with-sysroot so it will
extract the sysroot from the compiler.
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hall tylerwh...@gmail.com
This fixes the issue I was having, I can now build db without having
to revert the previous patch to enable C++ bindings.
Tested-by: Paul Barker p
specified. This appears to be the root cause of YP bug 5311.
This patch should fix that behaviour and that bug.
Signed-off-by: Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk
Cc: Mark Hatle mark.ha...@windriver.com
Cc: Saul Wold saul.w...@intel.com
---
This patch needs testing against the cases where
\|tools\|scripts)/.*' -type f -name *.[csS]
-delete stack up?
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman
On 27 January 2014 12:44, Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote:
The case statement for ARGS_OPT_ADD_EXCLUDE added to the argument handling
switch statement in opkg was missing a break; at the end, so it was falling
through into the handler for ARGS_OPT_NOACTION. Thus when --add-exclude
script compare the old and
new OPKGLIBDIR paths and move data if needed. That would let me move
everything from /usr/lib to /var/lib.
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded
On 14 February 2014 13:15, Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote:
On 13 February 2014 11:38, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 17:40 +0200, Laurentiu Palcu wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 03:07:31PM +, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Wed, 2014-02-12
that man was not installed but the
rest of the system was installed correctly.
Signed-off-by: Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk
Cc: Mark Hatle mark.ha...@windriver.com
Cc: Saul Wold saul.w...@intel.com
Cc: Alexandru Georgescu alexandru.c.george...@intel.com
---
Changes:
V2: Used 'editdiff' to ensure
v0.2.1 of opkg is a minor bugfix release.
Tested on qemux86 to ensure opkg-native can build an image and opkg can update,
remove and install packages.
Signed-off-by: Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk
---
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_0.2.0.bb | 12
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg
duplicate the creation of ${sysconfdir}/opkg/arch.conf and
so that bit should go. I think it should probably be replaced by a
template recipe in meta-skeleton which shows a developer how to create
their own feed config in a recipe.
Thanks,
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http
to be part of coreutils.)
Looks like busybox should provide realpath:
http://www.busybox.net/downloads/BusyBox.html#realpath
Thanks,
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded
,
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
that question, the change looks good at first glance.
If any of that doesn't work for you, let me know and I'll try to help out.
Thanks,
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded
1 - 100 of 521 matches
Mail list logo
