---
.../{man-pages_3.36.bb = man-pages_3.41.bb} |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-extended/man-pages/{man-pages_3.36.bb =
man-pages_3.41.bb} (80%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/man-pages/man-pages_3.36.bb
---
build/conf/sanity_info |3 +++
build/pseudodone |1 +
.../{man-pages_3.36.bb = man-pages_3.41.bb} |4 ++--
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 build/bitbake.lock
create mode
---
build/conf/sanity_info |3 +++
build/pseudodone |1 +
.../{man-pages_3.36.bb = man-pages_3.41.bb} |8
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 build/bitbake.lock
create mode
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
.../{man-pages_3.36.bb = man-pages_3.41.bb} |8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-extended/man-pages/{man-pages_3.36.bb =
man-pages_3.41.bb} (68%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/man
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
.../gawk/{gawk_4.0.0.bb = gawk_4.0.1.bb} |6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-extended/gawk/{gawk_4.0.0.bb = gawk_4.0.1.bb} (86%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/gawk/gawk_4.0.0.bb
b
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
meta/recipes-support/curl/curl/noldlibpath.patch | 76
.../curl/{curl_7.24.0.bb = curl_7.25.0.bb}|5 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/curl/curl
that this patch
slips in the following:
-+AC_SUBST(GNUTLS_REQUIRED)
Not sure if you missed that, it might still be needed.
Sau!
On 05/23/2012 01:20 AM, Radu Moisan wrote:
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisanradu.moi...@intel.com
---
meta/recipes-support/curl/curl/noldlibpath.patch | 76
considering this context, can someone provide more information about
AC_SUBST(GNUTLS_REQUIRED). I'm digging into this issue to check whether
we still need this or not, but additional info would be appreciated.
Radu
On 05/24/2012 09:32 AM, Radu Moisan wrote:
sorry I should have put a comment
/updates
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=rmoisan/updates
Radu Moisan (3):
foomatic-filters: update to version 4.0.15
mtd-utils: Update to version 1.5.0
dbus: Update to version 1.5.12
.../dbus/{dbus-1.4.16 = dbus-1.5.12}/dbus-1.init |0
.../dbus/{dbus-1.4.16
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
...filters_4.0.7.bb = foomatic-filters_4.0.15.bb} |6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-extended/foomatic/{foomatic-filters_4.0.7.bb =
foomatic-filters_4.0.15.bb} (90%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
.../add-exclusion-to-mkfs-jffs2-git-2.patch|0
.../mtd/{mtd-utils_1.4.9.bb = mtd-utils_1.5.0.bb} |2 +-
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
rename meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/{mtd-utils-1.4.9 =
mtd-utils-1.5.0}/add
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
.../dbus/{dbus-1.4.16 = dbus-1.5.12}/dbus-1.init |0
.../dbus/{dbus-1.4.16 = dbus-1.5.12}/tmpdir.patch |0
meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus_1.4.16.bb |7 ---
meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus_1.5.12.bb |7
your're right, I'll prepare a new patch for that.
Thanks,
Radu
On 05/25/2012 11:51 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:50:56AM +0300, Radu Moisan wrote:
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisanradu.moi...@intel.com
---
.../add-exclusion-to-mkfs-jffs2-git-2.patch|0
.../mtd
one more thing about mtd-utils, is there a way I can test this package
so that I can be sure the correct version was built?
Thanks,
Radu
On 05/25/2012 12:30 PM, Radu Moisan wrote:
your're right, I'll prepare a new patch for that.
Thanks,
Radu
On 05/25/2012 11:51 AM, Martin Jansa wrote
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
.../{man-pages_3.36.bb = man-pages_3.41.bb} |8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-extended/man-pages/{man-pages_3.36.bb =
man-pages_3.41.bb} (68%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/man
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
.../add-exclusion-to-mkfs-jffs2-git-2.patch|0
.../mtd/{mtd-utils_1.4.9.bb = mtd-utils_1.5.0.bb} |4 ++--
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/{mtd-utils-1.4.9 =
mtd-utils-1.5.0
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=rmoisan/mtd-utils-1.5.0
Radu Moisan (1):
mtd-utils: Update to version 1.5.0
.../add-exclusion-to-mkfs-jffs2-git-2.patch|0
.../mtd/{mtd-utils_1.4.9.bb = mtd-utils_1.5.0.bb} |4 ++--
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2
On 05/28/2012 01:55 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
Hi,
First, sorry for the thread breaking, I've just joined this list and I
didn't get this mail.
Koen Kooi wrote:
dbus: Update to version 1.5.12
First: how was this tested?
the only testing I've done so far is to ensure it build and then check
On 05/28/2012 02:21 PM, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
Dbus comes with a test suite. Running those should be a must.
I could not find how to run the test suite. I've tried dbus-daemon,
dbus-monitor, and the rest, but non of them have options for some
runtime checks. Other than that I imagine the test
On 05/28/2012 04:26 PM, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
mailto:radu.moi...@intel.com wrote:
On 05/28/2012 02:21 PM, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
Dbus comes with a test suite. Running those should be a must.
I could not find
On 05/29/2012 09:28 AM, Radu Moisan wrote:
On 05/28/2012 04:26 PM, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
mailto:radu.moi...@intel.com wrote:
On 05/28/2012 02:21 PM, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
Dbus comes with a test suite. Running
this is what I was looking for. I'll try it soon as my hard-codded
version finshes buiding. thanks.
Radu
On 05/29/2012 10:01 AM, Sarbu, Florin-Ionut (Florin) wrote:
EXTRA_OECONF+=--enable-tests may be what you are looking for.
-Original Message-
*From: *Radu Moisan [radu.moi
On 05/28/2012 04:44 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 14:30 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 28 May 2012 14:26, Andrei Gherzanand...@gherzan.ro wrote:
There is an internal test suite for dbus. You can enable building those
tests in configure:
--enable-tests
Is there a good
On 05/29/2012 11:29 AM, Radu Moisan wrote:
On 05/28/2012 04:44 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 14:30 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 28 May 2012 14:26, Andrei Gherzanand...@gherzan.ro wrote:
There is an internal test suite for dbus. You can enable building those
tests
On 05/29/2012 12:28 PM, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
mailto:radu.moi...@intel.com wrote:
How do I add something in the dependency chain? With --enable-test
dbus fails at do_configure complaining about
| configure
On 05/29/2012 12:42 PM, Florin Sarbu wrote:
that would be dbus-glib you need at this point as Andrei pointed out,
not python-dbus
dbus-glib and python-dbus are building fine (with --disable-tests),
however dbus is still crushing in do_configure (same way as before). The
question is, where do
On 05/29/2012 03:10 PM, Philip Balister wrote:
On 05/28/2012 09:58 AM, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 14:30 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 28 May 2012 14:26, Andrei
Unstable version 1.5.12 also supported
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
.../dbus/{dbus-1.4.16 = dbus-1.4.20}/dbus-1.init |0
.../dbus/{dbus-1.4.16 = dbus-1.4.20}/tmpdir.patch |0
meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus-1.5.12/dbus-1.init | 121
meta
I have not been able to test dbus using it's test suite. Building dbus
with --enable-tests (or variations with the subsets) is an ongoing task.
As of now I cannot build (with any configuration of tests), was the
tests build for previous releases?
radu
On 05/30/2012 10:11 AM, Radu Moisan
Unstable version 1.5.12 also supported
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
.../dbus/{dbus-1.4.16 = dbus-1.4.20}/dbus-1.init |0
.../dbus/{dbus-1.4.16 = dbus-1.4.20}/tmpdir.patch |0
meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus-1.5.12/dbus-1.init | 121
meta
I'm trying to setup everything on my laptop and I cannot start any
build. I must have missed something, the following is the error I get:
radu@elitebook bitbake core-image-minimal
Pseudo is not present but is required, building this first before the
main build
Loading cache: 100%
Live image installer did not preserve BSP specified console= kernel parameter.
This patch updates the init scripts that are responsible for grub.cfg creation
so that options like console= are passed allong from installer to installed img
[YOCTO #2426]
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi
Added new info for tinylogin.
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
.../conf/distro/include/upstream_tracking.inc |3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta-yocto/conf/distro/include/upstream_tracking.inc
b/meta-yocto/conf/distro/include
As suggested in 70067f082af279b58247467ec29283b310a1575e we do not
need this dependency.
[YOCTO #2527]
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
meta/recipes-bsp/grub/grub-efi-native_1.99.bb |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/grub
Close-on-exec seems to be unsuported on some architectures like CentOS 5.8
and thus causing some packages to fail to build successfully. Future kernel
version will probably fix this, but for now this patch works around this
problem.
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
meta
Close-on-exec seems to be unsuported on some architectures like CentOS 5.8
and thus causing some packages to fail to build successfully. Future kernel
version will probably fix this, but for now this patch works around this
problem.
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
meta
Close-on-exec seems to be unsuported on some architectures like CentOS 5.8
and thus causing some packages to fail to build successfully. Future kernel
version will probably fix this, but for now this patch works around this
problem.
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
meta
, but that's not in the scope of this patch.
If something does indeed break, then a totally different patch is
required, targeting a backport of kmod for kernel older than 2.6.23.
Radu
On 07/23/2012 05:34 PM, Enrico Scholz wrote:
Radu Moisan radu.moisan-ral2jqcrhueavxtiumw...@public.gmane.org
provide dbus-x11, for compatibility.
Fixes [Yocto #2261]
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus.inc | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus.inc b/meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus.inc
index
provide dbus-x11, for compatibility.
Fixes [Yocto #2261]
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus.inc | 11 ++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus.inc b/meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus.inc
index a75583d
provide dbus-x11, for compatibility.
Fixes [Yocto #2261]
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus.inc | 11 ++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus.inc b/meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus.inc
index a75583d
it does not build, it complains about nothing providing dbus-x11
Radu
On 07/26/2012 09:17 AM, Radu Moisan wrote:
Followed suggestions from Bugz 2261:
1) remove the --with-x/--without-x configure arguments. If you want to force
no-discovery for native builds the correct argument is --disable
geschreven:
On Thursday 26 July 2012 10:08:49 Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 26 jul. 2012, om 08:29 heeft Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com het
volgende geschreven:
it does not build, it complains about nothing providing dbus-x11
Radu
On 07/26/2012 09:17 AM, Radu Moisan wrote:
Followed suggestions from
the build issue was solved by RPROVIDES, while PROVIDES did not fix the
build or influence the error in any way.
Radu
On 07/26/2012 12:51 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 26 jul. 2012, om 11:18 heeft Radu Moisan het volgende geschreven:
What's the point of PROVIDES += dbus-x11, it build fine without
should I create a single patch that changes dbus-x11 to dbus, or one for
each package?
Radu
On 07/26/2012 01:23 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 26 July 2012 10:51, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote:
What's the point of PROVIDES += dbus-x11, it build fine without it (I'm not
questioning
I see no build-time dependencies on dbus-x11 (only runtime
dependencies), so, assuming PROVIDES is used at build-time, I don't see
it's point.
Radu
On 07/26/2012 01:31 PM, Radu Moisan wrote:
the build issue was solved by RPROVIDES, while PROVIDES did not fix
the build or influence the error
I understand the reasoning behind RPROVIDES. I've grep'ed the sources
and none of the packages that depend on dbus-x11 have build time
dependencies on it, so the question arises what's the point of
PROVIDES?. I understand the compatibility argument, but it seems to me
more like an argument
only in meta meta-intel.
Radu
On 07/26/2012 03:51 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 26 jul. 2012, om 14:36 heeft Radu Moisan het volgende geschreven:
I understand the reasoning behind RPROVIDES. I've grep'ed the sources and none
of the packages that depend on dbus-x11 have build time dependencies
This was also my understanding. Ok so we want PROVIDES in there just for
the case in which someone in some layer created a dependency on dbus-x11
(in some recipe) with DEPENDS and we don't want to break his build -
this argument will suffice, as far as I am concerned.
Radu
On 07/26/2012
it does not crash at runtime. You can try
dbus-launch --auto-syntax
it'll start a bus and print out the information like:
DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS='unix:abstract=/tmp/dbus-N48lpeD2TP,guid=0f3cd66fdbdc2f436a9356790002eaa1';
export DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS;
DBUS_SESSION_BUS_PID=23640;
Radu
On
provide dbus-x11, for compatibility.
Fixes [Yocto #2261]
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus.inc | 13 -
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus.inc b/meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus.inc
index
On 07/27/2012 12:12 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 26 July 2012 14:17, Enrico Scholz enrico.sch...@sigma-chemnitz.de wrote:
Radu Moisan radu.moisan-ral2jqcrhueavxtiumw...@public.gmane.org
writes:
Followed suggestions from Bugz 2261:
1) remove the --with-x/--without-x configure arguments.
why
On 07/27/2012 09:10 AM, Radu Moisan wrote:
On 07/27/2012 12:12 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 26 July 2012 14:17, Enrico Scholzenrico.sch...@sigma-chemnitz.de wrote:
Radu Moisanradu.moisan-ral2jqcrhueavxtiumw...@public.gmane.org
writes:
Followed suggestions from Bugz 2261:
1) remove
) Potentially make dbus provide dbus-x11, for compatibility.
Fixes [Yocto #2261]
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus.inc |9 ++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus.inc b/meta/recipes-core
) make dbus provide dbus-x11, for compatibility.
Fixes [Yocto #2261]
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus.inc | 11 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus.inc b/meta/recipes-core/dbus
For libunique I have
No Upgrade Reason:Do not upgrade to version: 2.91.4 because it requires
gtk+ = 2.90.0 and the stable version of gtk+ used by poky is 2.20.1
Is this still true?
Radu
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
this is what my intention was as well, but nobody confirmed when I asked
about it. I'll prepare another patch.
Radu
On 07/30/2012 06:07 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 30 July 2012 12:24, Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com wrote:
+PROVIDES = dbus-x11
The provides that provide comparability were
) make dbus provide dbus-x11, for compatibility.
Fixes [Yocto #2261]
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus.inc | 10 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus.inc b/meta/recipes-core/dbus
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
.../atk/{atk_2.2.0.bb = atk_2.5.4.bb} |8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-support/atk/{atk_2.2.0.bb = atk_2.5.4.bb} (72%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/atk/atk_2.2.0.bb
b/meta
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
.../atk/{atk_2.2.0.bb = atk_2.4.0.bb} |8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-support/atk/{atk_2.2.0.bb = atk_2.4.0.bb} (72%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/atk/atk_2.2.0.bb
b/meta
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
.../atk/{atk_2.2.0.bb = atk_2.4.0.bb} |8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-support/atk/{atk_2.2.0.bb = atk_2.4.0.bb} (72%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/atk/atk_2.2.0.bb
b/meta
Latest version is 1.0.0 but in rc4 for now.
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
.../{babeltrace_0.8.bb = babeltrace_0.12.bb} |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-kernel/lttng-2.0/{babeltrace_0.8.bb = babeltrace_0.12.bb}
(91
...@git.openembedded.org wrote:
Module: openembedded-core.git
Branch: master
Commit: c02364f36e228835ea5d7fd4e1d347fd451f8544
URL:
http://git.openembedded.org/?p=openembedded-core.gita=commit;h=c02364f36e228835ea5d7fd4e1d347fd451f8544
Author: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
Date: Tue Jul 31 09:23:23 2012
ok, thanks Martin, I'll give it a shot later today.
Radu
On 08/01/2012 11:28 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 11:17:39AM +0300, Radu Moisan wrote:
Could not get rid of PREFERRED_PROVIDER warning. Tried different
variations but the warning remains there every time. Can you give
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
meta/recipes-kernel/kmod/kmod.inc|6 +++---
meta/recipes-kernel/kmod/kmod_git.bb |2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/kmod/kmod.inc
b/meta/recipes-kernel/kmod/kmod.inc
index
LICENSE file has data changed.
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
meta/recipes-support/liburcu/liburcu_0.7.3.bb |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/liburcu/liburcu_0.7.3.bb
b/meta/recipes-support/liburcu/liburcu_0.7.3.bb
just realised I had two patches in my tree, that's why I missed the
checksum.
I'll fix that in a bit.
Radu
On 08/01/2012 02:44 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 02:42:00PM +0300, Radu Moisan wrote:
LICENSE file has data changed.
Without any change in package (tarball checksums
LICENSE file has the date changed otherwise just a regular
package update.
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
.../liburcu/{liburcu_0.6.7.bb = liburcu_0.7.3.bb} |6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-support/liburcu/{liburcu_0.6.7.bb
No it doesn't, just found Alex's patch.
Since Alex's patch is older and ongoing review, just forget about this one.
Radu
On 08/01/2012 05:01 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 04:54:58PM +0300, Radu Moisan wrote:
LICENSE file has the date changed otherwise just a regular
package
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
.../tzdata/{tzdata_2012c.bb = tzdata_2012d.bb}|8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-extended/tzdata/{tzdata_2012c.bb = tzdata_2012d.bb} (97%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/tzdata
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
.../usbutils/{usbutils_0.91.bb = usbutils_002.bb} |7 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-bsp/usbutils/{usbutils_0.91.bb = usbutils_002.bb} (80%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/usbutils/usbutils_0.91
sourceforge.net link is broken at the time of this patch,
so I added a mirror.
License changed to GPLv2+
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
meta/classes/mirrors.bbclass |1 +
.../{watchdog_5.11.bb = watchdog_5.12.bb} | 11 +--
2 files
On 08/02/2012 12:10 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 12:08:50PM +0300, Radu Moisan wrote:
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
Why not current 006? And lsusb link is not needed anymore?
I really don't know why I chose 002, I'll follow with a new patch for 006
Radu
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
.../usbutils/{usbutils_0.91.bb = usbutils_006.bb} |7 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-bsp/usbutils/{usbutils_0.91.bb = usbutils_006.bb} (80%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/usbutils/usbutils_0.91
On 08/02/2012 06:25 PM, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
mailto:radu.moi...@intel.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
mailto:radu.moi...@intel.com
---
.../usbutils/{usbutils_0.91.bb http
I found the following code in u-boot.inc
if not d.getVar(UBOOT_MACHINE, True):
PN = d.getVar(PN, True)
FILE = os.path.basename(d.getVar(FILE, True))
bb.debug(1, To build %s, see %s for instructions on \
setting up your machine config % (PN, FILE))
raise
Sorry, my bad, I was trying to build u-boot-fw-utils and assumed wrongly
that the recipe requires u-boot.inc
Radu
On 08/03/2012 11:45 AM, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
mailto:radu.moi...@intel.com wrote:
I found the following
used for testing coreboot-x86.
For u-boot-fw-utils fw_enc.c was changed and it requires a header
file config.h which is autogenerated at config so it requires a
make NAME_config.
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
...ls_2012.04.01.bb = u-boot-fw-utils_2012.07.bb} |7
On 08/03/2012 03:46 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 03:38:42PM +0300, Radu Moisan wrote:
Building u-boot requires UBOOT_MACHINE. In the u-boot README file
building u-boot is achieved with make NAME_config and then
make all. I assumend UBOOT_MACHINE to be the NAME part and thus
On 08/03/2012 07:19 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Radu Moisan,
In message 1343997523-4117-1-git-send-email-radu.moi...@intel.com you wrote:
Building u-boot requires UBOOT_MACHINE. In the u-boot README file
building u-boot is achieved with make NAME_config and then
make all. I assumend
For u-boot-fw-utils, fw_enc.c was changed and it requires a header
file config.h which is autogenerated at config so it requires a
make NAME_config.
I used for testing coreboot-x86.
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
...ls_2012.04.01.bb = u-boot-fw-utils_2012.07.bb} |7
On 08/06/2012 09:55 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 09:54:07AM +0300, Radu Moisan wrote:
For u-boot-fw-utils, fw_enc.c was changed and it requires a header
file config.h which is autogenerated at config so it requires a
make NAME_config.
I used for testing coreboot-x86
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
.../pango/pango-1.28.4/noconst.patch | 408
.../multilib-fix-clean.patch |0
.../{pango-1.28.4 = pango-1.30.0}/no-tests.patch | 14 +-
.../pango/{pango_1.28.4.bb = pango_1.30.0.bb
I may be recipe configuration, however, here are my steps:
bitbake u-boot -c cleanall
bitbake u-boot -c fetch
bitbake -c devshell u-boot
in the new shell
make coreboot-x86 (without _config)
The output I got is as follows:
Configuring for coreboot-x86 - Board: coreboot, Options:
CROSS_COMPILE is set in EXTRA_OEMAKE which is used in oe-runmake()
within do_compile()
Running devshell is achieved in do_devshell() which is run after
do_patch() but before do_compile(), that's why in devshell CROSS_COMPILE
is not (yet) set.
I think this is the intended way for things to work,
I meant, set with the correct value. i386-linux- is preloaded into
CROSS_COMPILE and then at do_compile() gcc is appended to it.
Is there in interest, to actually build u-boot in devshell?
Radu
On 08/06/2012 05:13 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Radu,
In message 501fd013.5040...@intel.com you
Do we need ocf-linux for something other than headers? The current
recipe looks like all it's doing is to install the headers. However, the
README file from the package talks about some kernel modules it provides
and patching the kernel for embedded systems. I don't have any
experience with
On 08/07/2012 11:38 PM, Andreas Müller wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Andreas Müller
schnitzelt...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Andreas Müller
schnitzelt...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com wrote:
Signed
License changed to GPLv2+
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
.../{watchdog_5.11.bb = watchdog_5.12.bb} | 13 ++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-extended/watchdog/{watchdog_5.11.bb = watchdog_5.12.bb}
(57%)
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
...rub-1.99-gcc-4.7.0-strict-aliasing-errors.patch | 147
...b-1.99-gcc-4.7.0-uninitialized-var-errors.patch | 41 -
.../grub/files/grub-1.99-gcc-4.7.0.patch | 34
.../files/grub
Added -Wno-unused-result because of a read() with no result, and causing
error due to -Werror
Updated grub recipe because of a patch name change 1.99 - 2.00
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
...2man.patch = grub-2.00-disable-help2man.patch} | 117 +++-
...grub
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
.../B921600.patch |0
.../busybox-appletlib-dependency.patch |0
.../busybox-mkfs-minix-tests_bigendian.patch |0
.../busybox-udhcpc-no_deconfig.patch | 37
On 08/14/2012 02:25 PM, Anders Darander wrote:
* Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com [120814 11:01]:
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
.../B921600.patch |0
.../busybox-appletlib-dependency.patch |0
.../busybox-mkfs
On 08/14/2012 03:01 PM, Anders Darander wrote:
* Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com [120814 13:42]:
On 08/14/2012 02:25 PM, Anders Darander wrote:
* Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com [120814 11:01]:
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
.../B921600.patch
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
.../coreutils-8.17/realpath-works-yes.patch| 13 +
.../remove-gets.patch | 20 +++-
.../remove-usr-local-lib-from-m4.patch |0
.../{coreutils_8.14.bb
heavily.
I don't have experience with autoconf so I may have missed the right
way to fix this.
Any comments well apreciated.
radu
On 08/17/2012 04:05 PM, Radu Moisan wrote:
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
.../coreutils-8.17/realpath-works-yes.patch| 13
On 08/17/2012 04:02 PM, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
While compiling dbus with tests, dbus and dbus-glib are needed.
To compile dbus-glib, dbus is needed (obviously). The only solution
(to compile dbus with tests) is to create a new recipe where to
compile dbus with --enable-tests
On 08/17/2012 06:55 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
On 08/17/2012 06:05 AM, Radu Moisan wrote:
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
.../coreutils-8.17/realpath-works-yes.patch| 13
+
.../remove-gets.patch | 20
Removed CONFIG_LSOF for backwards compatibility.
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan radu.moi...@intel.com
---
.../B921600.patch |0
.../busybox-appletlib-dependency.patch |0
.../busybox-mkfs-minix-tests_bigendian.patch |0
.../busybox
On 08/20/2012 11:31 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Monday 20 August 2012 09:28:41 Phil Blundell wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 09:25 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Monday 20 August 2012 09:18:17 Phil Blundell wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 10:46 +0300, Radu Moisan wrote:
@@ -97,6 +97,8
1 - 100 of 276 matches
Mail list logo
