On Sun, 30 Oct 2016, Christopher Larson wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 5:25 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca>
> wrote:
>
> not sure if i should have noticed this before, but i was building a
> number of python modules, and my collection
c875f1d5c39516c88f5063e4ba88a7cb for
/home/rpjday/oe/dist/layers/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/postgresql/postgresql_9.4.8.bb.do_package
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario
on-to-disable-glx-support.patch \
file://no-need-for-python3.patch \
"
SRCREV="e2c33af5bfcfc9d168f9e776156dd47c33f428b3"
PV = "1.3.1"
it is just my responsibility to notice that, and use PREFERRED_VERSION
to make sure i get the version i want?
rday
--
===
-six appears in three
different layers ... is there any effort expended to identify
redundancy and remove it?
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http
unless you explicitly add "perl" to
PACKAGECONFIG, it removes them during installation.
it has the same effect, i guess, but it seems a bit weird. is there
a rationale for doing this? i might have a couple more questions about
this particular recipe after i read furth
it, yes?)
actually, that might be it for this post ... am i missing any other
subtleties involving PACKAGECONFIG worth mentioning? another
PACAKGECONFIG-related post coming shortly, but it's more focused so
i'll post it separately.
rday
--
=
On Fri, 28 Oct 2016, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> On 28 October 2016 at 09:00, Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> more silly questions ... just noticed that some of the recipes i'm
> looking for exist under meta-debian; is there any issue with &quo
cipes? or, as long
as it seems to work, i can just grab what i want and add it to my
current checkout of poky?
thanks.
rday
--
================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
On Thu, 27 Oct 2016, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On 16-10-27 08:46 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > ack ... never mind, i see my fundamental misunderstanding. i
> > thought all of the recipes being processed via the "perl-modules"
> > package were bein
roof-of-concept, i'd like to add
the Text::Template module to my "qemuppc" target.
thoughts? sorry for all the earlier noise, i thought i had it
figured out but ... no.
rday
--
================
Robert P. J. Day
is this even remotely the right approach? is there an OE/YP manual
that explains this somewhere? thanks.
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter:
rap += "${PN}-module-warnings-register"
so, AFAICT, i need define only the equivalent information for
additional modules i want, and explicitly add those to the list of
modules i want built.
seems pretty straightforward, am i overlooking anything?
r
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016, Christopher Larson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:05 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca>
> wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2016, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> > i once wrote a wiki page on "bb", distinguishing between queri
cally don't work with perl modules, so if i sound clueless
about perl packaging, that's because i am.
--
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter:
en package. is there
an option to not have it do that, to behave like rpm4 did? thanks.
more perl packaging questions coming shortly ...
rday
--
========
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontar
reading correctly that those should represent the same thing, and
that (theoretically) i could include either equivalently?
ok, back to work ...
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario
:
perl-module-io-compress-base-common
perl-module-io-compress-base
represent the base class? i'm just trying to figure out the standard
OE packaging for perl modules.
rday
--
================
Robert P. J. Day
"Shows" -> "Show", to be consistent with standard form of help output.
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca>
---
yes, i am that pedantic.
diff --git a/scripts/oe-pkgdata-util b/scripts/oe-pkgdata-util
index bb917b4..dbffd6a 100755
--- a/
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, Christopher Larson wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca>
> > wrote:
> > i've just been handed a list of about 200 perl packages
On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, Christopher Larson wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca>
> wrote:
> i've just been handed a list of about 200 perl packages by their
> centos rpm names, and i want to map most
On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, Christopher Larson wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca>
> wrote:
> i've just been handed a list of about 200 perl packages by their
> centos rpm names, and i want to map most
-time-hires, which i assume is part of the dynamic naming
being done in perl_5.22.1.bb.
am i approaching this the right way?
rday
--
================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
ng that if i
have the time and space to build an eSDK, there is no downside
compared to building a standard SDK? as in, i don't lose anything from
the standard SDK, i just get a richer feature set, etc.
rday
--
========
Robe
arger than the one for minimal).
what happens if i try to install those two SDKs in the same
directory (/opt/poky.2.2/)? would that even work?
and now, off to read more manual ...
rday
--
========
Robert
GMANAGE_BOOTSTRAP}",d)}
ROOTFS_BOOTSTRAP_INSTALL="run-postinsts"
so it's being added both as part of IMAGE_INSTALL and as part of
ROOTFS_BOOTSTRAP_INSTALL. someone else is free to decide whether
that's worth caring about.
rday
--
===
other?
rday
--
========
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:
Make it clear that SDK testing can use any valid image.
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca>
---
diff --git a/meta/classes/testsdk.bbclass b/meta/classes/testsdk.bbclass
index 77c9203..43342b1 100644
--- a/meta/classes/testsdk.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/testsdk.b
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, Khem Raj wrote:
>
> > On Oct 22, 2016, at 9:53 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, Khem Raj wrote:
> >
> >> generally meta-toolchain is prior art. You want to use image
> >> spe
s seem to suggest.
rday
--
================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://c
t, respectively, the TOOLCHAIN_HOST_TASK and
TOOLCHAIN_TARGET_TASK values?
anyway, as long as i'm starting with the right info, pretty sure i
can take it from there, accompanied by the SDK manual:
http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.2/sdk-manual/sdk-manual.html
rday
--
========
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, Ulf Magnusson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca>
> wrote:
> >
> > a question about chris larson's nifty "bb" utility ... i recently
> > figured out that,
get the full value of the variable
when the SDK is being built?
rday
p.s. same question if i was using "bitbake -e".
--
================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> ok, this one should be simple ... i ran:
>
> $ bitbake -c populate_sdk core-image-minimal
>
> then popped into tmp/deploy/rpm/x86_64_nativesdk to see the rpms
> of interest to me:
>
> nativesdk-rpm-5.4.16-r0.x86_64_na
is there a special setting to get the nativesdk-rpm-build into the SDK
as well? or am i just misunderstanding what i'm reading? thanks.
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 06:31 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > just for fun, i'm going to do a fresh build right now, involving:
> >
> > * fresh "git pull" of poky
> > * MACHINE=mpc8315e-rdb
> > * bitbake
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 17:34 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > so, i'm home and on a different system about to do a build ...
> > refresh my memory, where are all those nativesdk rpms supposed to
> > show up? if memory serves, th
an ETA for just moving to 5.4.17?
rday
--
============
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/
other "special cases" like
this i should be aware of?
rday
--
================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 17:34 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > so, i'm home and on a different system about to do a build ...
> > refresh my memory, where are all those nativesdk rpms supposed to
> > show
> > up? if memory
On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:42:27 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:32:25 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > >
On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:32:25 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:27:05 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:27:05 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > not sure how dumb a question this is, but as i was doing a basic OE
> > >
> > > build, i saw the growing
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> not sure how dumb a question this is, but as i was doing a basic OE
> build, i saw the growing number of "nativesdk" rpms piling up under
> tmp/deploy/rpm/x86_64_linux, and wanted to examine a couple of them
> later, but
hat entire directory was deleted.
is there a switch to preserve that directory? thanks.
rday
--
========
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.c
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-10-17 at 07:57 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> so is it a fair statement that, pedantically, i might as well just
> > define everything in terms of SERIAL_CONSOLES and think that way?
> >
>
>
efine everything in terms of SERIAL_CONSOLES and think that way?
rday
--
================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Javier Viguera wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> On 21/08/16 17:51, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > i apologize for being clueless, but i'm still unclear on what i need
> > to do here, and in my case, i'm going in the opposite direction.
> >
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> not sure why i never noticed this before, but why do layers *append*
> to BBFILE_COLLECTIONS rather than just assigning the layer name with a
> simple assignment? is this just to allow alternate names for the same
> layer
example where this is being used?
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http
On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Javier Viguera wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> On 21/08/16 17:51, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > i apologize for being clueless, but i'm still unclear on what i
> > need to do here, and in my case, i'm going in the opposite
> > direction.
>
On Sun, 21 Aug 2016, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 09:59:22AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Aug 2016, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 12:41:25PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > >
> > > > i want
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 12:41:25PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > i want to add the u-boot-fw-utils recipe to my current build,
> > but u-boot is *not* part of the relevant BSP layer -- u-boot is
> > being configured and
do i specify that i want to add that recipe to my build,
while saying, "don't worry about the default environment, you don't
need it." can that be done? thanks.
rday
--
========
Robert
sn't* have the appropriate spaces, but is
getting away with it only because a string elsewhere is being generous
and covering for it.
and, yes, i *am* that pedantic.
rday
--
============
Robert P. J. Day
On Thu, 18 Aug 2016, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> On 17 August 2016 at 15:01, Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
>
> recipes-extended/images/core-image-kernel-dev.bb:IMAGE_ROOTFS_EXTRA_SPACE_append
> += "+ 300"
>
>
> I'm guessing tha
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca>
---
Tweak that line to use the same format as all other examples
involving that variable, for consistency.
diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-kernel-dev.bb
b/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-kernel-dev.bb
On Wed, 17 Aug 2016, Ulf Magnusson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Aug 2016, Khem Raj wrote:
> >
> > ... big snip ...
> >
> >> the _append/_prepend in conjunction with +=
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca>
---
for pedantic consistency, i also removed the *trailing* space from
the libtirpc line, since subsequent appends should be responsible for
adding the necessary leading space. i wonder if that will break
anything...
diff --git
e manual says nothing about a possible "+":
http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#var-IMAGE_ROOTFS_EXTRA_SPACE
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day Ot
end" with "+=" or ".=".
does that sound like a reasonable coding style?
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
ht
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016, Ulf Magnusson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca>
> wrote:
> >
> > was about to submit a small number of patches to clean up redundancy
> > when people combine "_append" with
ading space?
that just makes my head hurt -- the possibility that "_append" is
being used in a way that normally makes it fail, only to have "+="
step in and save the day. at which point "_append" saves processing
that until the end of parsing? yeesh.
thoughts?
rd
ctory whose name normally
implies a layer.
rday
--
================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpj
On Fri, 5 Aug 2016, Khem Raj wrote:
> On 16-08-05 17:11:34, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Aug 2016, Khem Raj wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > On Aug 5, 2016, at 11:52 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca>
> > > > wrote:
> > &
On Fri, 5 Aug 2016, Khem Raj wrote:
>
> > On Aug 5, 2016, at 11:52 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> >
> >
> > i'm in the situation where i want to add the u-boot-fw-utils package
> > to my image, but the corresponding u-boot source fo
need to supply to
build that package? i've never been in the situation where u-boot
wasn't part of the BSP.
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http
On Fri, 5 Aug 2016, Khem Raj wrote:
>
>
> On 8/5/16 8:31 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Aug 2016, Khem Raj wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 8/5/16 8:14 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >>>
> >>> i have a systemd-based i
On Fri, 5 Aug 2016, Khem Raj wrote:
>
>
> On 8/5/16 8:14 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > i have a systemd-based image that, after coming up normally, i want
> > to fire off a one-time script which, after completion, reboots. i've
> > been told t
--
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn
On Fri, 5 Aug 2016, Andrew Bradford wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> On 08/05 06:19, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > your personal opinions, if you would -- i'm working on some scripts
> > to do automated installs on a target board, currently based on
> > parted, but
On Fri, 5 Aug 2016, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2016-08-05 12:19, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > your personal opinions, if you would -- i'm working on some scripts
> > to do automated installs on a target board, currently based on
> > parted, but parted seems a bit
strong
opinions either way of parted versus sfdisk? i realize that's not much
to go on, just curious about personal preferences, and why.
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
On Fri, 29 Jul 2016, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-07-29 at 07:54 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Jul 2016, Richard Purdie wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2016-07-29 at 07:43 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 29 Jul 2016, Robert P. J.
On Fri, 29 Jul 2016, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-07-29 at 07:43 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Jul 2016, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > ... snip ...
> >
> > > am i missing anything? i'm assuming i'd use a .bbappend recipe to
&
On Fri, 29 Jul 2016, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
... snip ...
> am i missing anything? i'm assuming i'd use a .bbappend recipe to
> add the script names to SRC_URI, then define "do_install_append()"
> to manually copy them over, or is there a proper way to do that i'm
> not
ript names to SRC_URI, then define "do_install_append()" to
manually copy them over, or is there a proper way to do that i'm not
seeing?
rday
--
================
Robert P. J. Day Ott
On Fri, 29 Jul 2016, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 05:30:14PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > never used "wic" before, and i'm wondering if it has the ability
> > to not create dd-able images so much as partition and format
>
elf.
rday
--
========
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjda
"utilities" -> "utility"
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca>
---
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/update-rc.d/update-rc.d_0.7.bb
b/meta/recipes-core/update-rc.d/update-rc.d_0.7.bb
index c15cb78..3b965c5 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-core/update-rc.d/
On Tue, 26 Jul 2016, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> On 26 July 2016 at 15:19, Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> i'm good with that, and one more (potentially idiotic) question
> about run-postinsts. i note in the OE recipe file that it inherits
&g
On Tue, 26 Jul 2016, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> On 26 July 2016 at 15:03, Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> for the first time, i want to use run-postinsts to run some initial
> system setup, so i'm assuming i need to add that
the reasoning there? thanks.
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
as the subject asks, are there any compelling reasons to not use
musl as the C library of choice for OE/YP builds? just wondering about
any potential downsides.
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day
that is, pretty much, line for line what i came up with as well. as
you suggest, it just seems ... sloppy.
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
i may be looking at this entirely incorrectly at the moment, but
what is the preferred way to sneak in a custom, target-specific
/etc/fw_env.config file when adding u-boot-fw-utils to one's image?
if i examine u-boot-fw-utils_2016.03.bb, i can see that that package
is based on (predictably)
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca>
---
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/run-postinsts/run-postinsts/run-postinsts
b/meta/recipes-devtools/run-postinsts/run-postinsts/run-postinsts
index 53a8e1d..04ba394 100755
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/run-postinsts/run-postins
possibilities still have to map directly to u-boot config
files.
that's it, right? is there anything more subtle happening under the
hood than that? thanks.
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa
be looking at? thanks.
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
erify that i can download a single kernel with an
embedded initramfs, which will run entirely out of RAM and with no
need of a second rootfs.
rday
--
============
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
cannot
use image live, hddimg or iso.' % initrd_i)
$
so ... should that first line be setting INITRD_IMAGE_VM rather than
just INITRD_IMAGE? or am i misreading?
rday
--
================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa,
image capable of booting a device with custom
install scripts, adding a second rootfs, used for testing."
that looks pretty dead-on for what i want. is that the best choice?
rday
--
========
Robert
hould work, no?
--
========
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com
d move on?
is there anything here i'm missing or misunderstanding? thanks.
rday
--
========
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.
--
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
On Thu, 26 May 2016, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Robert P. J. Day
> <rpj...@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> >
> > i've grumbled about this before -- the *apparent* redundancy in
> > combining the "_append" and "+=" constructs -
ppend"
and, say, "=+". or some other operator.
--
================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twi
ything under include/uapi should be
copied, or there's not much point to that kernel directory.
better yet, where is the code/script/class that does that actual
copying, so i can read it for myself? thanks muchly.
rday
--
=============
On Mon, 9 May 2016, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca>
> wrote:
>
> (aside: this is with wind river linux 8 and i dropped bruce a note
> about it, but i really should keep this stuf
On Mon, 9 May 2016, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca>
> wrote:
>
> (aside: this is with wind river linux 8 and i dropped bruce a note
> about it, but i really should keep thi
rday.scc", then things work fine. is
this expected behaviour? is there some reason that if SRC_URI
includes, say "derf.cfg", the configuration will automatically look
for and try to process "derf.scc"? or am i just doing something silly?
401 - 500 of 1037 matches
Mail list logo
