On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing
in a patch to sync with upstream work-in-progress. We skip over the
5.8 release and move to 5.9.
there already are patches for 5.9 available too
On 04/05/2011 11:18 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing
in a patch to sync with upstream work-in-progress. We skip over the
5.8 release and move to 5.9.
there
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/05/2011 11:18 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing
in a patch to sync with upstream
On 04/06/2011 10:05 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/05/2011 11:18 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing
in a
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/06/2011 10:05 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/05/2011 11:18 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
The
On 04/06/2011 10:26 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/06/2011 10:05 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/05/2011 11:18 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/06/2011 10:26 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/06/2011 10:05 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On
On 04/06/2011 11:27 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/06/2011 10:26 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/06/2011 10:05 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Tom
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/06/2011 11:27 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/06/2011 10:26 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On
On 04/06/2011 11:32 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/06/2011 11:27 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/06/2011 10:26 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:10 AM,
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 23:18 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing
in a patch to sync with upstream work-in-progress. We skip over the
5.8 release and move to 5.9.
On 04/06/2011 11:38 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 23:18 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing
in a patch to sync with upstream work-in-progress. We
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 23:18 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing
in a patch
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/06/2011 11:32 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/06/2011 11:27 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 10:35 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
On 04/06/2011 10:26 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/06/2011 10:05 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/05/2011 11:18
On 04/06/2011 02:16 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 10:35 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
On 04/06/2011 10:26 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/06/2011 10:05 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Tom Rini
The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing
in a patch to sync with upstream work-in-progress. We skip over the
5.8 release and move to 5.9. Also, we move most of the contents of the
main recipe into the previously unused ncurses.inc file.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini
The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing
in a patch to sync with upstream work-in-progress. We skip over the
5.8 release and move to 5.9.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com
---
.../{ncurses-5.7 = ncurses-5.9}/config.cache |0
.../{ncurses-5.7 =
18 matches
Mail list logo
