Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] ncurses: Update to 5.9
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing
in a patch to sync with upstream work-in-progress. We skip over the
5.8 release and move to 5.9.
there already are patches for 5.9 available too
ftp://invisible-island.net/ncurses/5.9/ncurses-5.9.patch.gz
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com
---
.../{ncurses-5.7 = ncurses-5.9}/config.cache | 0
.../{ncurses-5.7 = ncurses-5.9}/tic-hang.patch | 0
.../ncurses/{ncurses_5.7.bb = ncurses_5.9.bb} | 21 +++
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-core/ncurses/{ncurses-5.7 = ncurses-5.9}/config.cache
(100%)
rename meta/recipes-core/ncurses/{ncurses-5.7 = ncurses-5.9}/tic-hang.patch
(100%)
rename meta/recipes-core/ncurses/{ncurses_5.7.bb = ncurses_5.9.bb} (88%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses-5.7/config.cache
b/meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses-5.9/config.cache
similarity index 100%
rename from meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses-5.7/config.cache
rename to meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses-5.9/config.cache
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses-5.7/tic-hang.patch
b/meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses-5.9/tic-hang.patch
similarity index 100%
rename from meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses-5.7/tic-hang.patch
rename to meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses-5.9/tic-hang.patch
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses_5.7.bb
b/meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses_5.9.bb
similarity index 88%
rename from meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses_5.7.bb
rename to meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses_5.9.bb
index 7ab078d..9d4aa22 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses_5.7.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses_5.9.bb
@@ -3,34 +3,21 @@ HOMEPAGE =
http://www.gnu.org/software/ncurses/ncurses.html;
LICENSE = MIT
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
file://ncurses/base/version.c;beginline=1;endline=27;md5=cbc180a8c44ca642e97c35452fab5f66
SECTION = libs
-PATCHDATE = 20100501
-PKGV = ${PV}+${PATCHDATE}
-PR = r1
+PR = r0
DEPENDS = ncurses-native
DEPENDS_virtclass-native =
inherit autotools binconfig
-SRC_URI = ${GNU_MIRROR}/ncurses/ncurses-${PV}.tar.gz;name=tarball \
-
ftp://invisible-island.net/ncurses/5.7/ncurses-5.7-20100424-patch.sh.bz2;apply=yes;name=p20100424sh
\
-\
-
http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/sources/ncurses-5.7-${PATCHDATE}.patch.gz;name=p20100501
\
+SRC_URI = ${GNU_MIRROR}/ncurses/ncurses-${PV}.tar.gz \
file://tic-hang.patch \
file://config.cache \
+SRC_URI[md5sum] = 8cb9c412e5f2d96bc6f459aa8c6282a1
+SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
9046298fb440324c9d4135ecea7879ffed8546dd1b58e59430ea07a4633f563b
-#
ftp://invisible-island.net/ncurses/5.7/ncurses-5.7-${PATCHDATE}.patch.gz;name=p20100501
-
-SRC_URI[tarball.md5sum] = cce05daf61a64501ef6cd8da1f727ec6
-SRC_URI[tarball.sha256sum] =
0a9bdea5c7de8ded5c9327ed642915f2cc380753f12d4ad120ef7da3ea3498f4
-SRC_URI[p20100424sh.md5sum] = 3a5f76613f0f7ec3e0e73b835bc24864
-SRC_URI[p20100424sh.sha256sum] =
1e9d70d2d1fe1fea471868832c52f1b9cc6065132102e49e2a3755f2f4f5be53
-SRC_URI[p20100501.md5sum] = 6518cfa5d45e9069a1e042468161448b
-SRC_URI[p20100501.sha256sum] =
a97ccc30e4bd6fbb89564f3058db0fe84bd35cfefee831556c500793b477abde
-
-#PARALLEL_MAKE =
EXTRA_AUTORECONF = -I m4
CONFIG_SITE =+ ${WORKDIR}/config.cache
--
1.7.0.4
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] ncurses: Update to 5.9
On 04/05/2011 11:18 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing in a patch to sync with upstream work-in-progress. We skip over the 5.8 release and move to 5.9. there already are patches for 5.9 available too ftp://invisible-island.net/ncurses/5.9/ncurses-5.9.patch.gz Wrong link? That reverse applies to ncurses 5.9 release. But regardless, is ncurses something we need to be tracking top of tree for? It seems like we needed to for 5.7 since there had been a lot going on without a release but that seems to have changed now. -- Tom Rini Mentor Graphics Corporation ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] ncurses: Update to 5.9
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: On 04/05/2011 11:18 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing in a patch to sync with upstream work-in-progress. We skip over the 5.8 release and move to 5.9. there already are patches for 5.9 available too ftp://invisible-island.net/ncurses/5.9/ncurses-5.9.patch.gz Wrong link? That reverse applies to ncurses 5.9 release. But regardless, is ncurses something we need to be tracking top of tree for? It seems like we needed to for 5.7 since there had been a lot going on without a release but that seems to have changed now. those patches usually contain critical bug fixes including security updates so it will be of interest to keep track of it -- Tom Rini Mentor Graphics Corporation ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] ncurses: Update to 5.9
On 04/06/2011 10:05 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: On 04/05/2011 11:18 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing in a patch to sync with upstream work-in-progress. We skip over the 5.8 release and move to 5.9. there already are patches for 5.9 available too ftp://invisible-island.net/ncurses/5.9/ncurses-5.9.patch.gz Wrong link? That reverse applies to ncurses 5.9 release. But regardless, is ncurses something we need to be tracking top of tree for? It seems like we needed to for 5.7 since there had been a lot going on without a release but that seems to have changed now. those patches usually contain critical bug fixes including security updates so it will be of interest to keep track of it Well, it doesn't currently. And while I agree we need to do a good job, everywhere, of keeping track of security updates, I don't think we should move back to depending on a site that frequently removes patches. -- Tom Rini Mentor Graphics Corporation ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] ncurses: Update to 5.9
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: On 04/06/2011 10:05 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: On 04/05/2011 11:18 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing in a patch to sync with upstream work-in-progress. We skip over the 5.8 release and move to 5.9. there already are patches for 5.9 available too ftp://invisible-island.net/ncurses/5.9/ncurses-5.9.patch.gz Wrong link? That reverse applies to ncurses 5.9 release. But regardless, is ncurses something we need to be tracking top of tree for? It seems like we needed to for 5.7 since there had been a lot going on without a release but that seems to have changed now. those patches usually contain critical bug fixes including security updates so it will be of interest to keep track of it Well, it doesn't currently. And while I agree we need to do a good job, everywhere, of keeping track of security updates, I don't think we should move back to depending on a site that frequently removes patches. yes. cache the patches like yocto did for 5.7 recipes -- Tom Rini Mentor Graphics Corporation ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] ncurses: Update to 5.9
On 04/06/2011 10:26 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: On 04/06/2011 10:05 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: On 04/05/2011 11:18 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing in a patch to sync with upstream work-in-progress. We skip over the 5.8 release and move to 5.9. there already are patches for 5.9 available too ftp://invisible-island.net/ncurses/5.9/ncurses-5.9.patch.gz Wrong link? That reverse applies to ncurses 5.9 release. But regardless, is ncurses something we need to be tracking top of tree for? It seems like we needed to for 5.7 since there had been a lot going on without a release but that seems to have changed now. those patches usually contain critical bug fixes including security updates so it will be of interest to keep track of it Well, it doesn't currently. And while I agree we need to do a good job, everywhere, of keeping track of security updates, I don't think we should move back to depending on a site that frequently removes patches. yes. cache the patches like yocto did for 5.7 recipes That still leaves the problem of there not being a valid patch there at the moment. And I still don't see why ncurses needs to be in the bucket of recipes we track the scm for rather than relying on the latest stable release. -- Tom Rini Mentor Graphics Corporation ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] ncurses: Update to 5.9
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: On 04/06/2011 10:26 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: On 04/06/2011 10:05 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: On 04/05/2011 11:18 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing in a patch to sync with upstream work-in-progress. We skip over the 5.8 release and move to 5.9. there already are patches for 5.9 available too ftp://invisible-island.net/ncurses/5.9/ncurses-5.9.patch.gz Wrong link? That reverse applies to ncurses 5.9 release. But regardless, is ncurses something we need to be tracking top of tree for? It seems like we needed to for 5.7 since there had been a lot going on without a release but that seems to have changed now. those patches usually contain critical bug fixes including security updates so it will be of interest to keep track of it Well, it doesn't currently. And while I agree we need to do a good job, everywhere, of keeping track of security updates, I don't think we should move back to depending on a site that frequently removes patches. yes. cache the patches like yocto did for 5.7 recipes That still leaves the problem of there not being a valid patch there at the moment. And I still don't see why ncurses needs to be in the bucket of recipes we track the scm for rather than relying on the latest stable release. 5.9 was released few days back so that patch might be lean for now but I assume overtime it will get fatter -- Tom Rini Mentor Graphics Corporation ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] ncurses: Update to 5.9
On 04/06/2011 11:27 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: On 04/06/2011 10:26 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: On 04/06/2011 10:05 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: On 04/05/2011 11:18 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing in a patch to sync with upstream work-in-progress. We skip over the 5.8 release and move to 5.9. there already are patches for 5.9 available too ftp://invisible-island.net/ncurses/5.9/ncurses-5.9.patch.gz Wrong link? That reverse applies to ncurses 5.9 release. But regardless, is ncurses something we need to be tracking top of tree for? It seems like we needed to for 5.7 since there had been a lot going on without a release but that seems to have changed now. those patches usually contain critical bug fixes including security updates so it will be of interest to keep track of it Well, it doesn't currently. And while I agree we need to do a good job, everywhere, of keeping track of security updates, I don't think we should move back to depending on a site that frequently removes patches. yes. cache the patches like yocto did for 5.7 recipes That still leaves the problem of there not being a valid patch there at the moment. And I still don't see why ncurses needs to be in the bucket of recipes we track the scm for rather than relying on the latest stable release. 5.9 was released few days back so that patch might be lean for now but I assume overtime it will get fatter It's invalid at the moment, yes. But you haven't explained why ncurses needs to be in the bleeding edge bucket. Usually this is for stuff that hasn't really reached a stability point. -- Tom Rini Mentor Graphics Corporation ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] ncurses: Update to 5.9
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: On 04/06/2011 11:27 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: On 04/06/2011 10:26 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: On 04/06/2011 10:05 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: On 04/05/2011 11:18 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing in a patch to sync with upstream work-in-progress. We skip over the 5.8 release and move to 5.9. there already are patches for 5.9 available too ftp://invisible-island.net/ncurses/5.9/ncurses-5.9.patch.gz Wrong link? That reverse applies to ncurses 5.9 release. But regardless, is ncurses something we need to be tracking top of tree for? It seems like we needed to for 5.7 since there had been a lot going on without a release but that seems to have changed now. those patches usually contain critical bug fixes including security updates so it will be of interest to keep track of it Well, it doesn't currently. And while I agree we need to do a good job, everywhere, of keeping track of security updates, I don't think we should move back to depending on a site that frequently removes patches. yes. cache the patches like yocto did for 5.7 recipes That still leaves the problem of there not being a valid patch there at the moment. And I still don't see why ncurses needs to be in the bucket of recipes we track the scm for rather than relying on the latest stable release. 5.9 was released few days back so that patch might be lean for now but I assume overtime it will get fatter It's invalid at the moment, yes. But you haven't explained why ncurses needs to be in the bleeding edge bucket. Usually this is for stuff that hasn't really reached a stability point. It does not have to be but those patches are cumulative fixed that are done on top of a release. I am sure we will also run into the problems those will fix thats why its better to keep and eye on them -- Tom Rini Mentor Graphics Corporation ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] ncurses: Update to 5.9
On 04/06/2011 11:32 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: On 04/06/2011 11:27 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: On 04/06/2011 10:26 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: On 04/06/2011 10:05 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: On 04/05/2011 11:18 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing in a patch to sync with upstream work-in-progress. We skip over the 5.8 release and move to 5.9. there already are patches for 5.9 available too ftp://invisible-island.net/ncurses/5.9/ncurses-5.9.patch.gz Wrong link? That reverse applies to ncurses 5.9 release. But regardless, is ncurses something we need to be tracking top of tree for? It seems like we needed to for 5.7 since there had been a lot going on without a release but that seems to have changed now. those patches usually contain critical bug fixes including security updates so it will be of interest to keep track of it Well, it doesn't currently. And while I agree we need to do a good job, everywhere, of keeping track of security updates, I don't think we should move back to depending on a site that frequently removes patches. yes. cache the patches like yocto did for 5.7 recipes That still leaves the problem of there not being a valid patch there at the moment. And I still don't see why ncurses needs to be in the bucket of recipes we track the scm for rather than relying on the latest stable release. 5.9 was released few days back so that patch might be lean for now but I assume overtime it will get fatter It's invalid at the moment, yes. But you haven't explained why ncurses needs to be in the bleeding edge bucket. Usually this is for stuff that hasn't really reached a stability point. It does not have to be but those patches are cumulative fixed that are done on top of a release. I am sure we will also run into the problems those will fix thats why its better to keep and eye on them That can be said for just about every recipe we have. It sounds like you're suggesting we need _svn recipe or similar recipe for ncurses as well. I still don't see why ncurses is special in this regard and ask that when you see a worthwhile patch for ncurses 5.9 that you do another pull request. I'm just trying to keep oe-core in sync with openembedded.master. -- Tom Rini Mentor Graphics Corporation ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] ncurses: Update to 5.9
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 23:18 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing in a patch to sync with upstream work-in-progress. We skip over the 5.8 release and move to 5.9. there already are patches for 5.9 available too ftp://invisible-island.net/ncurses/5.9/ncurses-5.9.patch.gz Can someone summarise what the benefits of these patches are? I'm trying to figure out whether we lose anything due to this upgrade or not... Cheers, Richard ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] ncurses: Update to 5.9
On 04/06/2011 11:38 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 23:18 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing in a patch to sync with upstream work-in-progress. We skip over the 5.8 release and move to 5.9. there already are patches for 5.9 available too ftp://invisible-island.net/ncurses/5.9/ncurses-5.9.patch.gz Can someone summarise what the benefits of these patches are? I'm trying to figure out whether we lose anything due to this upgrade or not... The patches we applied to 5.7 are part of the 5.8 release and 5.9 of course replaces 5.8. The invisible-island.net patch sets are things taken from the official source repo and put out there for use. -- Tom Rini Mentor Graphics Corporation ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] ncurses: Update to 5.9
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 23:18 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing in a patch to sync with upstream work-in-progress. We skip over the 5.8 release and move to 5.9. there already are patches for 5.9 available too ftp://invisible-island.net/ncurses/5.9/ncurses-5.9.patch.gz Can someone summarise what the benefits of these patches are? I'm trying to figure out whether we lose anything due to this upgrade or not... ftp://invisible-island.net/ncurses/5.9/README Cheers, Richard ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] ncurses: Update to 5.9
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: On 04/06/2011 11:32 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: On 04/06/2011 11:27 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: On 04/06/2011 10:26 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: On 04/06/2011 10:05 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: On 04/05/2011 11:18 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing in a patch to sync with upstream work-in-progress. We skip over the 5.8 release and move to 5.9. there already are patches for 5.9 available too ftp://invisible-island.net/ncurses/5.9/ncurses-5.9.patch.gz Wrong link? That reverse applies to ncurses 5.9 release. But regardless, is ncurses something we need to be tracking top of tree for? It seems like we needed to for 5.7 since there had been a lot going on without a release but that seems to have changed now. those patches usually contain critical bug fixes including security updates so it will be of interest to keep track of it Well, it doesn't currently. And while I agree we need to do a good job, everywhere, of keeping track of security updates, I don't think we should move back to depending on a site that frequently removes patches. yes. cache the patches like yocto did for 5.7 recipes That still leaves the problem of there not being a valid patch there at the moment. And I still don't see why ncurses needs to be in the bucket of recipes we track the scm for rather than relying on the latest stable release. 5.9 was released few days back so that patch might be lean for now but I assume overtime it will get fatter It's invalid at the moment, yes. But you haven't explained why ncurses needs to be in the bleeding edge bucket. Usually this is for stuff that hasn't really reached a stability point. It does not have to be but those patches are cumulative fixed that are done on top of a release. I am sure we will also run into the problems those will fix thats why its better to keep and eye on them That can be said for just about every recipe we have. It sounds like you're suggesting we need _svn recipe or similar recipe for ncurses as well. I still don't see why ncurses is special in this regard and ask that when you see a worthwhile patch for ncurses 5.9 that you do another pull request. I'm just trying to keep oe-core in sync with openembedded.master. Those patches are not same as all patches that would be applied to say svn version these are fixes on top of a release e.g. 5.9 I was merely suggesting that your upgrade patch is fine please see if there already are some fixes on top of 5.9 that we need thats all -- Tom Rini Mentor Graphics Corporation ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] ncurses: Update to 5.9
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 10:35 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: On 04/06/2011 10:26 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: On 04/06/2011 10:05 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: On 04/05/2011 11:18 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing in a patch to sync with upstream work-in-progress. We skip over the 5.8 release and move to 5.9. there already are patches for 5.9 available too ftp://invisible-island.net/ncurses/5.9/ncurses-5.9.patch.gz Wrong link? That reverse applies to ncurses 5.9 release. But regardless, is ncurses something we need to be tracking top of tree for? It seems like we needed to for 5.7 since there had been a lot going on without a release but that seems to have changed now. those patches usually contain critical bug fixes including security updates so it will be of interest to keep track of it Well, it doesn't currently. And while I agree we need to do a good job, everywhere, of keeping track of security updates, I don't think we should move back to depending on a site that frequently removes patches. yes. cache the patches like yocto did for 5.7 recipes That still leaves the problem of there not being a valid patch there at the moment. And I still don't see why ncurses needs to be in the bucket of recipes we track the scm for rather than relying on the latest stable release. It sounds like these patches are more like tracking an SCM rather than a source of specific security patches or critical updates. I think it might be wise to note this location in the recipe as a comment (can someone please send an updated patch) but I don't think we should be including these patches by default, particular if upstream are making regular releases again. Cheers, Richard ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] ncurses: Update to 5.9
On 04/06/2011 02:16 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 10:35 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: On 04/06/2011 10:26 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: On 04/06/2011 10:05 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: On 04/05/2011 11:18 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote: The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing in a patch to sync with upstream work-in-progress. We skip over the 5.8 release and move to 5.9. there already are patches for 5.9 available too ftp://invisible-island.net/ncurses/5.9/ncurses-5.9.patch.gz Wrong link? That reverse applies to ncurses 5.9 release. But regardless, is ncurses something we need to be tracking top of tree for? It seems like we needed to for 5.7 since there had been a lot going on without a release but that seems to have changed now. those patches usually contain critical bug fixes including security updates so it will be of interest to keep track of it Well, it doesn't currently. And while I agree we need to do a good job, everywhere, of keeping track of security updates, I don't think we should move back to depending on a site that frequently removes patches. yes. cache the patches like yocto did for 5.7 recipes That still leaves the problem of there not being a valid patch there at the moment. And I still don't see why ncurses needs to be in the bucket of recipes we track the scm for rather than relying on the latest stable release. It sounds like these patches are more like tracking an SCM rather than a source of specific security patches or critical updates. I think it might be wise to note this location in the recipe as a comment (can someone please send an updated patch) but I don't think we should be including these patches by default, particular if upstream are making regular releases again. I'll go v2 it -- Tom Rini Mentor Graphics Corporation ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] ncurses: Update to 5.9
The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing
in a patch to sync with upstream work-in-progress. We skip over the
5.8 release and move to 5.9. Also, we move most of the contents of the
main recipe into the previously unused ncurses.inc file.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com
---
.../{ncurses-5.7 = ncurses-5.9}/config.cache |0
.../{ncurses-5.7 = ncurses-5.9}/tic-hang.patch|0
meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses.inc | 256 +++-
meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses_5.7.bb | 246 ---
meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses_5.9.bb | 10 +
5 files changed, 204 insertions(+), 308 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-core/ncurses/{ncurses-5.7 = ncurses-5.9}/config.cache
(100%)
rename meta/recipes-core/ncurses/{ncurses-5.7 = ncurses-5.9}/tic-hang.patch
(100%)
delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses_5.7.bb
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses_5.9.bb
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses-5.7/config.cache
b/meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses-5.9/config.cache
similarity index 100%
rename from meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses-5.7/config.cache
rename to meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses-5.9/config.cache
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses-5.7/tic-hang.patch
b/meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses-5.9/tic-hang.patch
similarity index 100%
rename from meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses-5.7/tic-hang.patch
rename to meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses-5.9/tic-hang.patch
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses.inc
b/meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses.inc
index 3f897f6..e244eb8 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses.inc
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ SUMMARY = The New Curses library
DESCRIPTION = SVr4 and XSI-Curses compatible curses library and terminfo
tools including tic, infocmp, captoinfo. Supports color, multiple highlights,
forms-drawing characters, and automatic recognition of keypad and function-key
sequences. Extensions include resizable windows and mouse support on both xterm
and Linux console using the gpm library.
HOMEPAGE = http://www.gnu.org/software/ncurses/ncurses.html;
LICENSE = MIT
-LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
file://ncurses/base/version.c;beginline=1;endline=27;md5=cf3c7ab00720a1b83391f49ea9956277
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
file://ncurses/base/version.c;beginline=1;endline=27;md5=cbc180a8c44ca642e97c35452fab5f66
SECTION = libs
DEPENDS = ncurses-native
DEPENDS_virtclass-native =
@@ -11,53 +11,121 @@ PACKAGES_append = ncurses-terminfo
FILES_ncurses_append = ${datadir}/tabset
RSUGGESTS_${PN} = ncurses-terminfo
RPROVIDES = libncurses5
+INC_PR = r0
-inherit autotools
+inherit autotools binconfig
-# This keeps only tput/tset in ncurses
-# clear/reset are in already busybox
-FILES_ncurses-tools = ${bindir}/tic ${bindir}/toe ${bindir}/infotocap
${bindir}/captoinfo ${bindir}/infocmp ${bindir}/clear.${PN}
${bindir}/reset.${PN} ${bindir}/tack
-FILES_ncurses-terminfo = ${datadir}/terminfo
-FILES_${PN} = ${bindir}/tput ${bindir}/tset ${libdir}/lib*.so.*
/usr/share/tabset /etc/terminfo
-
-PARALLEL_MAKE=
-
-FILESPATH =
${FILE_DIRNAME}/local:${FILE_DIRNAME}/ncurses-${PV}-${PR}:${FILE_DIRNAME}/ncurses-${PV}:${FILE_DIRNAME}/ncurses:${FILE_DIRNAME}
-
-EXTRA_OECONF = --with-shared \
---with-libtool \
- --without-profile \
- --without-debug \
- --disable-rpath \
- --enable-echo \
- --enable-const \
- --without-ada \
- --enable-termcap \
- --without-cxx-binding \
- --with-terminfo-dirs=${sysconfdir}/terminfo:${datadir}/terminfo
\
- --enable-overwrite \
- --with-build-ldflags='' \
- --with-build-ccflags=''
-export BUILD_CCFLAGS = -I${S}/ncurses -I${S}/include ${BUILD_CFLAGS}
-export BUILD_LDFLAGS =
-export EXTRA_OEMAKE = 'BUILD_LDFLAGS= BUILD_CCFLAGS=${BUILD_CCFLAGS}'
+# Upstream has useful patches at times at ftp://invisible-island.net/ncurses/
+SRC_URI = ${GNU_MIRROR}/ncurses/ncurses-${PV}.tar.gz
+
+EXTRA_AUTORECONF = -I m4
+CONFIG_SITE =+ ${WORKDIR}/config.cache
+
+# Whether to enable separate widec libraries; must be 'true' or 'false'
+#
+# TODO: remove this variable when widec is supported in every setup?
+ENABLE_WIDEC = true
+
+# _GNU_SOURCE is required for widec stuff and is detected automatically
+# for target objects. But it must be set manually for native and sdk
+# builds.
+BUILD_CPPFLAGS += -D_GNU_SOURCE
+
+# Override the function from the autotools class; ncurses requires a
+# patched autoconf213 to generate the configure script. This autoconf
+# is not available so that the shipped script will be used.
+do_configure() {
+# check does not work with cross-compiling and is generally
+# broken because it requires stdin to be pollable (which is
+# not the case for /dev/null redirections)
+
[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] ncurses: Update to 5.9
The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing
in a patch to sync with upstream work-in-progress. We skip over the
5.8 release and move to 5.9.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com
---
.../{ncurses-5.7 = ncurses-5.9}/config.cache |0
.../{ncurses-5.7 = ncurses-5.9}/tic-hang.patch|0
.../ncurses/{ncurses_5.7.bb = ncurses_5.9.bb} | 21 +++
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-core/ncurses/{ncurses-5.7 = ncurses-5.9}/config.cache
(100%)
rename meta/recipes-core/ncurses/{ncurses-5.7 = ncurses-5.9}/tic-hang.patch
(100%)
rename meta/recipes-core/ncurses/{ncurses_5.7.bb = ncurses_5.9.bb} (88%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses-5.7/config.cache
b/meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses-5.9/config.cache
similarity index 100%
rename from meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses-5.7/config.cache
rename to meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses-5.9/config.cache
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses-5.7/tic-hang.patch
b/meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses-5.9/tic-hang.patch
similarity index 100%
rename from meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses-5.7/tic-hang.patch
rename to meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses-5.9/tic-hang.patch
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses_5.7.bb
b/meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses_5.9.bb
similarity index 88%
rename from meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses_5.7.bb
rename to meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses_5.9.bb
index 7ab078d..9d4aa22 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses_5.7.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses_5.9.bb
@@ -3,34 +3,21 @@ HOMEPAGE = http://www.gnu.org/software/ncurses/ncurses.html;
LICENSE = MIT
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
file://ncurses/base/version.c;beginline=1;endline=27;md5=cbc180a8c44ca642e97c35452fab5f66
SECTION = libs
-PATCHDATE = 20100501
-PKGV = ${PV}+${PATCHDATE}
-PR = r1
+PR = r0
DEPENDS = ncurses-native
DEPENDS_virtclass-native =
inherit autotools binconfig
-SRC_URI = ${GNU_MIRROR}/ncurses/ncurses-${PV}.tar.gz;name=tarball \
-
ftp://invisible-island.net/ncurses/5.7/ncurses-5.7-20100424-patch.sh.bz2;apply=yes;name=p20100424sh
\
-\
-
http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/sources/ncurses-5.7-${PATCHDATE}.patch.gz;name=p20100501
\
+SRC_URI = ${GNU_MIRROR}/ncurses/ncurses-${PV}.tar.gz \
file://tic-hang.patch \
file://config.cache \
+SRC_URI[md5sum] = 8cb9c412e5f2d96bc6f459aa8c6282a1
+SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
9046298fb440324c9d4135ecea7879ffed8546dd1b58e59430ea07a4633f563b
-#
ftp://invisible-island.net/ncurses/5.7/ncurses-5.7-${PATCHDATE}.patch.gz;name=p20100501
-
-SRC_URI[tarball.md5sum] = cce05daf61a64501ef6cd8da1f727ec6
-SRC_URI[tarball.sha256sum] =
0a9bdea5c7de8ded5c9327ed642915f2cc380753f12d4ad120ef7da3ea3498f4
-SRC_URI[p20100424sh.md5sum] = 3a5f76613f0f7ec3e0e73b835bc24864
-SRC_URI[p20100424sh.sha256sum] =
1e9d70d2d1fe1fea471868832c52f1b9cc6065132102e49e2a3755f2f4f5be53
-SRC_URI[p20100501.md5sum] = 6518cfa5d45e9069a1e042468161448b
-SRC_URI[p20100501.sha256sum] =
a97ccc30e4bd6fbb89564f3058db0fe84bd35cfefee831556c500793b477abde
-
-#PARALLEL_MAKE =
EXTRA_AUTORECONF = -I m4
CONFIG_SITE =+ ${WORKDIR}/config.cache
--
1.7.0.4
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
